LOL!!!!

Ray's done got senile.

'Louder with Crowder'?

Yeah, whatever...

#42 | Posted by snoofy

You kinda shut 'em up with that one, troll.

Jeffy and reality have parted ways.

#118 | Posted by JeffJ

Yer fulla crap, Jeffy.

Jesus wept...this ---- could not get any more stupid.

Too bad Nixon couldn't have found this a couple of days ago...coulda saved a lotta wailing and gnashing of teeth...

Yeah...this has been covered:

#4 | Posted by MSgt at 2019-10-20 06:25 PM | Reply | Flag: Pointless and stupid.

#2 | Posted by sitzkrieg

Not surprisingly, your reading/comprehension skills suck.

"Angrydad never claimed the work as his own original thought,therefore he didn't commit plagiarism.

#70 | POSTED BY SCOTTY "

Yes, I know that. That's why I never claimed he is the one who plagiarized it. What is your point?

#72 | Posted by goatman

Except for this:

"Why aren't you chastising angrydad for plagiarism?"

#41 | Posted by goatman

And this:

"I didn't plagiarize anything, you piece of brain-dead shart residue."

Actually you did. To use someone else's work and not give them credit is platiarism. Look i up.

'When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers.'

Socrates

Better luck next time, angrydad

#47 | Posted by goatman at 2019-10-20 02:57 PM | Reply | Flag:
| Funny: 1

Like I said, dude's a caricature...and a liar.

This is hilarious:

Goat-boy makes numerous off-topic comments.

People respond to Goat-boy's off-topic comments.

Goat-boy responds to admonishment: "well, they were off-topic, too!"

Dude's a caricature.

#54 | Posted by snoofy

In all fairness, I did not originally include the link to the dude's facebook page, simply because the source of the piece was social media and neither important nor relevant. Social media doesn't really qualify as a legitimate news source and this was not a "news story". So, give the poor ol' goat some slack...he appears to be a severely diabetic, half blind, mobility challenged shut in with little else, besides his cherished standing here at The Drudge, to give meaning to his daily routine.

Well done AngryDad. To whom do we attribute this spot-on observation?

#1 | Posted by oldwhiskeysour at 2019-10-20 10:00 AM | Reply | Flag:

#1 | Posted by oldwhiskeysour

Nobody special, just some random American dude on social media, Rob Campbell.

#2 | Posted by Angrydad at 2019-10-20 10:13 AM | Reply | Flag:

What part of this does the brain-dead piece of shart residue not understand?

LOL!

"Why aren't you chastising angrydad for plagiarism?"

I didn't plagiarize anything, you piece of brain-dead shart residue.

See post #2.

LOL!

Bears repeating:

"As usual, Goat will walk a mile rather than look truth in the eye.

Goat, why are you arduously avoiding going back and giving props to the actual author who did write it, unknown for certain, tho she may be? Your pretext of being too pure to accept a social media descriptive narrative without an exact proper accreditation is a ruse to allow you to attack the other posters, who choose to reflect upon the substance of the post.

This is why you lead the plonk parade, Goat. You come here simply to deflect from the paved road of substantive discussion, into a false procedural, grammatical, semantic, weeded path to mindless oblivon, rather than discuss the topic, when said topic throws shade on your ideology."

#28 | Posted by oldwhiskeysour

"The name ANGRYDAD has always hit me as great."

Just for the record, I "plagiarized" it from a Simpsons episode...LOL!

#15 | Posted by goatman

Yes. And obviously that negates its point, you disingenuous hack.

#7 | Posted by Pegasus

Based on that idiotic logic, they should hate America...LOL!

#10 | Posted by

It's not a "story", dumbass...and there's a link in #8. But, yes it appears it has been passed around for months and possibly altered from it's original source. So, obviously, that negates its point.

And worse, he is that most unforgivable of all things: a bully.
That is, except when he is among bullies; then he suddenly transforms into a snivelling sidekick instead.

There are unspoken rules to this stuff " the Queensberry rules of basic decency " and he breaks them all. He punches downwards " which a gentleman should, would, could never do " and every blow he aims is below the belt. He particularly likes to kick the vulnerable or voiceless " and he kicks them when they are down.

So the fact that a significant minority " perhaps a third " of Americans look at what he does, listen to what he says, and then think Yeah, he seems like my kind of guy' is a matter of some confusion and no little distress to the American people, given that:
Americans are supposed to be nicer than that, and mostly are.
You don't need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot more than a few flaws in the man.

This last point is what especially confuses and dismays most American people, and many other people too; his faults seem pretty hard to miss.
After all, it's impossible to read a single tweet, or hear him speak a sentence or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He turns being artless into an art form; he is a Picasso of pettiness; a Shakespeare of ----. His faults are fractal: even his flaws have flaws, and so on ad infinitum.
God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and plenty of nasty people too. But rarely has stupidity been so nasty, or nastiness so stupid.

He makes Nixon look trustworthy and George W look smart.
In fact, if Frankenstein decided to make a monster assembled entirely from human flaws " he would make a Trump.

And a remorseful Doctor Frankenstein would clutch out big clumpfuls of hair and scream in anguish:
My God ... what ... have ... I ... created?
If being a ---- was a TV show, Trump would be the boxed set.

Looks like a large portion is now missing from the original post. Here's the entirety:

Trump lacks certain qualities which Americans traditionally esteem.
For instance, he has no class, no charm, no coolness, no credibility, no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no subtlety, no sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no honor and no grace " all qualities, funnily enough, with which his predecessor Mr. Obama was generously blessed.
So for us, the stark contrast does rather throw Trump's limitations into embarrassingly sharp relief.

Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has never once said anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing " not once, ever.
I don't say that rhetorically, I mean it quite literally: not once, not ever. And that fact is particularly disturbing to the American sensibility " for us, to lack humor is almost inhuman.

But with Trump, it's a fact. He doesn't even seem to understand what a joke is " his idea of a joke is a crass comment, an illiterate insult, a casual act of cruelty.

Trump is a troll. And like all trolls, he is never funny and he never laughs; he only crows or jeers.

And scarily, he doesn't just talk in crude, witless insults " he actually thinks in them. His mind is a simple bot-like algorithm of petty prejudices and knee-jerk nastiness.

There is never any under-layer of irony, complexity, nuance or depth. It's all surface.

Some Americans might see this as refreshingly upfront.
Well, most of us don't. We see it as having no inner world, no soul.

Trump is neither plucky, nor an underdog. He is the exact opposite of that.
He's not even a spoiled rich-boy, or a greedy fat-cat.

He's more a fat white slug. A Jabba the Hutt of privilege.

(pt1)

#1 | Posted by oldwhiskeysour

Nobody special, just some random American dude on social media, Rob Campbell.

"It's almost as if this was a distraction all along, and it's served its purpose..."

That's a lame, lazy, worn out excuse.