Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Tuesday, July 29, 2025

California's ambitious $20 minimum wage for fast food workers has already led to steep job losses, according to a new economic study. While supporters claim the hike helped workers, data suggests it's pushed many out of work entirely. Key Facts: California raised its minimum wage for fast food workers to $20/hour on April 1, 2024. A study from the National Bureau of Economic Research found the state lost 18,000 fast food jobs"down 3.2% compared to other states. Employment in the same sector rose by about 0.1% nationwide during the same period. The law, AB 1228, gave a state-appointed council power to set fast food wages going forward. Gov. Gavin Newsom's office disputed the findings, citing a UC Berkeley study with different conclusions.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

A Ruskie bot says what??

#1 | Posted by a_monson at 2025-07-29 04:02 PM | Reply

Bozo believes anything he reads that confirms his demented world view.

#2 | Posted by Angrydad at 2025-07-29 04:15 PM | Reply

This is working as expected.

#3 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-07-29 04:20 PM | Reply


Bozo believes anything he reads that confirms his demented world view.
#2 | Posted by Angrydad

That maybe true, but in this case he is factually correct. There are less workers at the taco bell and local Chipolte.

#4 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-07-29 04:21 PM | Reply

Coincidence is not causality.

The phrase "coincidence is not causality" is a way of expressing the idea that simply because two events occur together does not mean one caused the other.

#5 | Posted by TrueBlue at 2025-07-29 04:24 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"the state lost 18,000 fast food jobs -down 3.2% compared to other states."

Oh no. Fewer fast food jobs in California. Because that's the sign of a healthy economy. Fast food jobs.

Anyway, here's the other study that is referenced, out of Berzerkeley.

8. Conclusions
In the first nine months of its existence, the California fast-food minimum wage policy has
worked as intended. It has significantly increased the pay of fast-food workers. It has not
had a negative effect on fast-food employment and the number of fast-food restaurants,
and it has generated very modest price increases.
These results would be surprising in the theoretical world of perfectly competitive labor
markets, where employed workers always have the option to move to a comparable job
with another employer and employers can hire all the workers they want at the going
wage. In such a world, increases in the price of labor reduce the demand for labor.
However, as numerous studies have found, real world labor markets are far from
competitive, low-wage labor markets especially so. In real world labor markets, frictions
restrict the mobility of labor and employers must increase pay if they want to hire more
workers.
irle.berkeley.edu

#6 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-07-29 04:34 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

You cant get any more liberal than Berkeley..

#7 | Posted by boaz at 2025-07-29 05:48 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

You cant get any more liberal than Berkeley..

Posted by boaz at 2025-07-29 05:48 PM | Reply

You're just jelly of their intelligence is all.

#8 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-07-29 05:54 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

So, instead of paying their workers a living wage, the wealthy fast-food franchise owners decide to reduce the number of workers they have to pay so that those franchise owners can continue their profits.

On the other hand, with fewer workers, those who remain will have to work harder to earn their higher pay.

#9 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-29 05:56 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Boaz is right!!!

Fast Food Workers should be paid like slaves!

Who cares if the other 500,000 fast food workers now have closer to living wage?!

We lost 18,000 super underpaid slaves!...err...I mean jobs...

Set it back to $16 an hour and let all 518,000 people starve!

#10 | Posted by Sycophant at 2025-07-29 07:11 PM | Reply

Wow, a whole 2% of fast food jobs. Glad that Tesla Diner opened up!

" -down 3.2% compared to other states."

WTF does that even mean? California no doubt has more high-end actual restaurants than a -------- like North Carolina, so who the ---- cares?

#11 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-07-29 07:55 PM | Reply

#5

"correlation and causality"

#12 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-29 08:06 PM | Reply

Re: #12

"Correlation is a statistical relationship, while coincidence is a matter of timing and chance. Correlation doesn't necessarily mean causation, and a correlation can sometimes be a coincidence."

#13 | Posted by TrueBlue at 2025-07-30 07:12 PM | Reply

California raised its minimum wage for fast food workers to $20 per hour starting April 1, 2024. According to several studies, this policy has led to significant job losses in the fast food sector, with estimates ranging from about 10,700 to 18,000 fewer jobs within a year, representing roughly a 3% decline relative to other states where fast food employment grew slightly[1][2][3]. The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) found a 3.2% drop, and other data show reductions in employee hours and a shift towards automation, such as kiosks replacing cashiers, contributing to fewer opportunities for lower-skilled workers[1][2].

Additionally, fast food menu prices increased significantly in California by about 14.5%, nearly double the national average, and many operators cut employee benefits to offset higher labor costs[1]. This wage hike has thus been linked to both fewer available jobs and higher food prices[1].

In contrast, a UC Berkeley study disputes these findings, concluding that the wage increase led to an 18% pay boost for workers but did not cause significant job losses or major price hikes[5][8]. This shows there are conflicting conclusions among studies, though the job loss findings have been supported by multiple research groups including NBER and Pepperdine University.

In summary, while the pay increase raised wages substantially, the predominant evidence suggests it also contributed to notable fast-food job reductions and higher prices in California within the first year of the $20 minimum wage policy[1][2][3]. However, the debate continues with some academic studies finding little to no negative employment effects[5][8].

[1] drudge.com
[2] san.com
[3] www.foxbusiness.com
[4] www.city-journal.org
[5] www.youtube.com
[6] www.usatoday.com
[7] www.yahoo.com
[8] www.usatoday.com
[9] www.kqed.org

#14 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2025-07-31 01:32 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Boaz's fear feed, when the Daily Mail doesn't offer enough:

tfppwire.com

"TFPP Wire helps you stay ahead with breaking news, analysis, and bold conservative insights on the economy, politics, national security, culture, and more."

The headlines are a trip.

#15 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2025-07-31 12:14 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort