"Iran shot down 2 F-35's in Combat yesterday."

Mmm...did they?

Or is that just some wishful thinking on your part?

"Now do Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Military targets or war crimes?"

Nuclear bombs are the reason there is still a Japan today.

Nuclear bombs enabled Japan to become what it is. Just like unconditional surrender enabled Germany to become what it is.

Hopefully, Palestinians will abandon Khahamas and realize their potential as well.

Had Senator Padilla actually had questions for Noem, he could have had his people reach out to her people. Both of them have armies of staffers.

This was a publicity stunt.

"So Iran can bomb civilians in Israel if they live near military commanders?"

Under the Geneva Conventions, yes. Absolutely. The military commander is a valid military target. The only additional legal consideration is proportionality. Using the least amount of force possible to get the kill.

And it applies to Hamas as well. Had Hamas attacked military outposts or military leadership, it's very likely the position of global governments would have been far different. Those are valid military targets. Instead, they chose to rape and murder kids at a rave.

"You mean the Qatari-backed Hamas ... the same Qatar that President Bone Spurs claims to have offered him a lavish airplane?"

I was over in the desert in 2018 when Tamim the Glorious spent a reported $1M USD on the change of command for the senior Air Force leadership at Al Udeid Air Base. At the same time, senior elements within the Qatari government/royal family were providing funds to ISIS.

Qatar has more money than they know what to do with. The average monthly income for a Qatari citizen is $20k. They spend lots of money and play all sides, and it gives them an out-sized voice on the global stage.

"But Netanyahu's indiscriminate killing of civilians as "collateral " damage makes it easier to be anti-Israel."

That's the really big thing that no one seems to get here. It's not indiscriminate. Those were very accurate pinpoint strikes that minimized collateral damage. For some background, the only interaction I ever had with the IDF was when we were copying their techniques on how to limit collateral damage when the coalition was dropping on ISIS.

The only additional measure Israel could have taken was to message the generals and scientists that they were going to die, and it would be better for everyone if they separated themselves from the civilian population.

Honestly, this was impressive. This is what a measured strike should look like. Not unguided rockets or mortars flying randomly into cities. The Islamists seeking to maximize civilian casualties. They're not concerned with the concept of valid military targets. The Russians seem to be attempting some level of precision targeting...they're just not very good at it yet.

"A lot of news agencies have reporters in Iran. Video and news reports are all over about damage to apartment buildings. Israel targeted them to kill military commanders. I believe even Israel has confirmed this now."

Military leaders are valid military targets. Which means that these attacks were almost certainly legal under the Geneva Conventions and LOAC. The only possible question would be proportionality. 'Senior leader' may mean different things. I'm sure the Israelis would have little issue presenting the legal reviews on the targets to those with the appropriate need to know.

Now let's compare that to Hamas's rocket attacks on cities in Israel.

Even if the US chose not to business with them, most other governments will continue to do so.

"Elon gets his money from SpaceX, not Tesla."

Starlink isn't going anywhere either.

"Zionists are the cause of the troubles."

What about the Palestinians?

Fortunately, manufacturing is coming back to the US. There will be plenty of jobs. Beautiful.

"You know who America did bring to America? The Nazis."

Yeah. The Arab states did the same. Syria, Egypt, and Iraq all brought in former German officers to act as advisors to their newly created militaries. Which may explain the rampant antisemitism in those countries.

"The partition, the mass exile, and the seizure of Palestinian land was forced on the people of Palestine by the European Colonial invaders."

Which colonial invaders might that have been? The Romans?

And remember, most Palestinians are descendants of invaders themselves.

"It was "Palestine (British Mandate)" from 1920-1948, on the map."

Yep.

Some of those "Palestinians" later went on to create the state of Israel.

"Trump, Nethanyahu and Putin are all untrustworthy, all sociopath, destroying each of their respective societies."

And Hamas is somehow better???

It almost sounds like the OP's argument is that the UK should not be on the lookout for terrorists.

"UK: RAF Deployed 518 Spy Flights Over Gaza Strip"

Probably a drop in the bucket compared to the spy flights flown over the Greater German Reich 80 years ago.

"It's a reference to Israel erasing Palestine from the map."

Palestine was never on the map. There has never been a Republic of Palestine, or an Emirate of Palestine, a Kingdom of Palestine...whatever. And that's not likely to change until the Palestinians take a greater interest in creating their own state than destorying the Jewish one.

"Rumor has it Iraq kinda has a secular government, and even a sort of democracy, at the moment."

Iraq has always had a secular government.

#3

Why do you think AfD became so popular?

They used to be the anti-immigration party. Now all the German parties, left and right, have adopted a hard line on immigrants.

I actually went to the LISEP website. It was interesting to find out that, based on their methodology, my 20-year-old daughter at the University of Arizona would need to be receiving $44,737 per year to meet minimum quality of life.

"I highly recommend Democracy Now! as a source of non-bias data."

Or One American News Network. Also super un-biased.

"Israelis seems to believe there can be no Jewish state unless "Amalek",is Annihilated."

Cute, champ. Israel seems to have a plan to de-nazify and rebuild Gaza, once the Islamic Resistance has been defeated. Like the Marshall Plan in Europe post-WWII.

And what if I was a Jew? Would it matter? I would hope not, although I get the feeling that Muslims and Arabs both fall in line behind Hamas, regardless of what Hamas does.

"Go peddle your Genocide BS somewhere else."

You do understand that genocide is Hamas's desired end-state, right?

Would you speak out if it was Arabs or Muslims killing Israelis? I'm guessing not, since that happened and it doesn't seem to concern you.

"Political Violence is brought out by people feeling TOTALLY UNREPRESENTED....Voiceless and Unheard... LEFT"

Yeah?

That's why the National Socialist German Workers' Party did it? Because they were "TOTALLY UNREPRESENTED?"