Wednesday, September 10, 2025

Supreme Court Takes Trump Tariff-Power Case

The justices agreed to an expedited timeline to decide whether Trump can unilaterally impose sweeping tariffs using a law designed for emergencies.

More

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court announced that it would determine whether President Donald Trump had properly imposed sweeping tariffs under a 1977 law. The court has fast-tracked two cases, scheduling argument on them for the first week in November.[image or embed]

-- SCOTUSblog (@scotusblog.com) Sep 9, 2025 at 6:11 PM

Comments

Just another opportunity for the Roberts Court to grant dictatorial and uncobstitutional powers o a traitor/dictator.

#1 | Posted by danni at 2025-09-10 07:26 AM

Headline is wrong.

It should read "Supreme Court agrees to grant Trump additional illegal powers."

#2 | Posted by jpw at 2025-09-10 08:26 AM

If everything is an emergency then nothing is an emergency.

#3 | Posted by Nixon at 2025-09-10 08:43 AM

Just another opportunity for the Roberts Court to grant dictatorial and unconstitutional powers to a traitor/dictator.
#1 | Posted by danni

"Well don't blame me. I voted for Jill Stein."
- Useful Idiots

#4 | Posted by censored at 2025-09-10 09:44 AM

John Roberts and the other lackeys on the court are going to be all butt hurt when Trump declares the Supreme Court unnecessary which could make sense since they pretty much are just a rubber stamp for his power grab. I can almost hear them whining already. Barrett claims there is no Constitutional Crisis but there won't be as long as they keep obeying him like servants. Thing is several Republican Presidents have found that "piece of paper" a/k/a The U.S. Constitution to be just an inconvenient impediment to his agenda.

#5 | Posted by danni at 2025-09-10 09:48 AM

They expedite this one but they wouldn't expedite Trump's criminal case. The majority of Court doesn't care that we have a criminal in the white house.

#6 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2025-09-10 01:47 PM

John Roberts and the other lackeys on the court are going to be all butt hurt when Trump declares the Supreme Court unnecessary which could make sense since they pretty much are just a rubber stamp for his power grab. I can almost hear them whining already. Barrett claims there is no Constitutional Crisis but there won't be as long as they keep obeying him like servants. Thing is several Republican Presidents have found that "piece of paper" a/k/a The U.S. Constitution to be just an inconvenient impediment to his agenda.

#5 | Posted by danni at 2025-09-10 09:48 AM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

"elections have consequences!" Danni when Obama was in office. HaHaHaHa. Loser

And to keep on topic, Dems aren't blocking Trump's tariffs because they are bad, they are blocking them because they are good and as we know anything that Trump does that is good for this country is bad in Dem's minds, you know because they love this country.

#7 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-09-11 12:25 PM

They expedite this one but they wouldn't expedite Trump's criminal case. The majority of Court doesn't care that we have a criminal in the white house.

#6 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2025-09-10 01:47 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)
| Newsworthy 1

You mean the lawfare cases that were overturned on appeal in the lower courts?

#8 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-09-11 12:29 PM

Drudge Retort Headlines

Mamdani Wins New York City Mayor's Race (138 comments)

Democrat Wins Virginia Governor (95 comments)

California Passes Prop 50 (38 comments)

UPS Plane Crashes at Louisville Airport (37 comments)

TPM: Democrats Won Everywhere on Tuesday (29 comments)

Narco-sub Carrying 1.7 Tonnes of Cocaine Seized in Atlantic (20 comments)

California GOP Sue After Voters Approve Prop 50 (19 comments)

Quite Possibly the Most Absurd SCOTUS Case of My Lifetime (16 comments)

Florida Can Ban Chinese Citizens from Buying Property: US Appeals Court (16 comments)

Russia Open to Sending Hypersonic Missiles to Venezuela (15 comments)