Every decade, one could look at the SCOTUS, and guess which way the court would rule.

Not based on the Constitution or the Law. Simply based on their leanings.

SCOTUS shouldn't be like that in any decade.

When the court rules 9-0, that's great.

But, when the court rules one way because the majority is Dem appointed and then rules the other way because the majority is now Rep appointed leaning, stop bitching.

The court shouldn't but it does. If the two pathetic parties don't like it, rewrite the laws. That's how you fix SCOTUS decisions.

#6, should Clinton be held criminally responsible for the bombing of the Chinese Embassy?

That immunity SCOTUS gave was already a known fact.

The courts just had to say that if any acts were not a Presidential Act...like Lewinsky.

Dred Scott was a 7-2 decision. Was the law and the Constitution correctly understood?

Prior decisions are not as absolute and overturning them should be done when their precedence is wrong.

Congress could, if they wanted, fix SCOTUS decisions any time they want. They choose not to- both parties.

If Congress thinks the courts are violating their position,impeach and remove the judges.

They don't or the won't?

Both parties have 'controlled' the Supreme Court. That branch was never supposed to be leaning either way. They were to be blind to politics, but human nature is what it is.

The Legislative branch could stop the nonsense by writing laws correctly, establishing the tests instead of letting the courts write law, but neither party will. They won't act.