A federal judge has ordered the Justice Department to explain whether it intends to contest President Trump's $10 billion lawsuit against the I.R.S. over the disclosure of his tax returns.
"Although President Trump avers that he is bringing this lawsuit in his personal capacity, he is the sitting president and his named adversaries are entities whose decisions are subject to his direction," the judge [Kathleen Williams] wrote in an order on Friday. "Accordingly, it is unclear to this court whether the parties are sufficiently adverse to each other."
Judge Williams ordered the government and Mr. Trump's personal lawyers to submit briefs on the question, essentially forcing the Justice Department to state its position on Mr. Trump's suit. As the judge explained in her order, the Constitution requires that the two parties in a lawsuit are genuinely opposed to each other " and not colluding to engineer a legal ruling favorable to both sides. Without a conflict, the lawsuit is void and the judge must dismiss it.
"There's a requirement of adverseness," said James E. Pfander, a law professor at Northwestern University. "If the opponents are, in fact, obligated to follow the president's assessment of the law, and if the president says, It's this way and it's got to be this way,' there can be no space for a dispute."
Drudge Retort Headlines
Virginia's Map Survives First Court Challenge (85 comments)
Trump Portrait to Be Added to US Passports in Unprecedented Move (24 comments)
King Charles III to Address Joint Meeting of US Congress (24 comments)
Trump's Rush to End War Risks Delivering Weak Nuclear Deal (24 comments)
Melania: 'Fire Jimmy Kimmel' (23 comments)
'Catastrophic Price Shock' Coming (21 comments)
Trump Fires All 24 Members of the National Science Board. (21 comments)
Trump Administration Secures New Indictment Against Comey (19 comments)
Russian Superyacht Sails Through Strait of Hormuz (19 comments)
Florida's Gerrymandering Proposal (15 comments)