Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, April 29, 2026

A federal judge has ordered the Justice Department to explain whether it intends to contest President Trump's $10 billion lawsuit against the I.R.S. over the disclosure of his tax returns.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

"Although President Trump avers that he is bringing this lawsuit in his personal capacity, he is the sitting president and his named adversaries are entities whose decisions are subject to his direction," the judge [Kathleen Williams] wrote in an order on Friday. "Accordingly, it is unclear to this court whether the parties are sufficiently adverse to each other."

Judge Williams ordered the government and Mr. Trump's personal lawyers to submit briefs on the question, essentially forcing the Justice Department to state its position on Mr. Trump's suit. As the judge explained in her order, the Constitution requires that the two parties in a lawsuit are genuinely opposed to each other " and not colluding to engineer a legal ruling favorable to both sides. Without a conflict, the lawsuit is void and the judge must dismiss it.

"There's a requirement of adverseness," said James E. Pfander, a law professor at Northwestern University. "If the opponents are, in fact, obligated to follow the president's assessment of the law, and if the president says, It's this way and it's got to be this way,' there can be no space for a dispute."

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Perhaps someone should ask (Acting) Attorney General of the United States Todd "Thank You Very Much, I Love You, Sir!" Blanche who got that client, MAGAJesus, who now wants $10 billion, convicted on 34 felony counts, something about this.

#1 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-04-29 09:36 AM | Reply

Why the question?

Just let the DoJ submit its briefs, and make a determination, what better way to scuttle the DoJ.

Now anything the judge does will appear partisan.

#2 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-04-29 12:41 PM | Reply

"the Constitution requires that the two parties in a lawsuit are genuinely opposed to each other"

Huge if true. Hugely unfair to Trump!
--Republicans

#3 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-04-29 01:01 PM | Reply

So can the Judge appoint council to represent We The People, if the judge determines IRS is unable or unwilling to litigate?

That's what normally happens, right?

#4 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-04-29 01:27 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort