FDA identifies cybersecurity risks in some patient monitors
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said on Thursday it had identified three cybersecurity risks associated with certain patient monitors from Contec and Epsimed and urged healthcare facilities to mitigate those risks.
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
LampLighter
Joined 2013/04/13Visited 2025/02/03
Status: user
MORE STORIES
‘Failing marriage’: Canadian border cities dismayed (12 comments) ...
Why does Musk want USAID 'to die'? (1 comments) ...
Ken Martin Elected to Head DNC (9 comments) ...
FDA identifies cybersecurity risks in some patient monitors (2 comments) ...
Trump Wants to Undo Diversity Programs. (7 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
More from the article ...
... Patient monitors, used in both healthcare facilities and home settings, display vital patient information including temperature, heartbeat and blood pressure. The FDA raised concerns about cybersecurity vulnerabilities in the patient monitors that could allow unauthorized individuals to access and potentially manipulate those devices. The patient monitors could be remotely controlled by unauthorized users or may not function as intended, and the network to which these devices are connected could be compromised, the agency warned. The FDA also said that once these devices are connected to the internet, they can collect patient data, including personally identifiable information and protected health information, and can export this data out of the healthcare delivery environment. ...
The FDA raised concerns about cybersecurity vulnerabilities in the patient monitors that could allow unauthorized individuals to access and potentially manipulate those devices.
The patient monitors could be remotely controlled by unauthorized users or may not function as intended, and the network to which these devices are connected could be compromised, the agency warned.
The FDA also said that once these devices are connected to the internet, they can collect patient data, including personally identifiable information and protected health information, and can export this data out of the healthcare delivery environment. ...
#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-02-02 10:05 PM | Reply
Reminds me of ...
Security Concerns Over Hacking Of Pacemakers, Other Implanted Medical Devices (2015) www.cbsnews.com
... Internet-connected medical implants, like pacemakers, are more common than ever. So, can they be hacked? A new report in the Journal Science suggests that could be the case. They're wondering if common medical devices, like pacemakers, pain pumps and glucose monitors, could be hacked, causing harm or even death to those who use them. Many of these devices connect with a hand-held controller over short distances using Bluetooth. Often, either the controller of the devices or the device itself is connected to the Internet by means of WiFi so that data can go to clinicians and the clinicians can review it. Security really has not been a focus of the FDA or device makers -- they're looking at reliability and safety. Now, if you think it can't happen, back in 2007, Vice President Dick Cheyney's cardiologist disabled the wireless functionality of his pacemaker because of just that fear. ...
A new report in the Journal Science suggests that could be the case. They're wondering if common medical devices, like pacemakers, pain pumps and glucose monitors, could be hacked, causing harm or even death to those who use them.
Many of these devices connect with a hand-held controller over short distances using Bluetooth. Often, either the controller of the devices or the device itself is connected to the Internet by means of WiFi so that data can go to clinicians and the clinicians can review it.
Security really has not been a focus of the FDA or device makers -- they're looking at reliability and safety.
Now, if you think it can't happen, back in 2007, Vice President Dick Cheyney's cardiologist disabled the wireless functionality of his pacemaker because of just that fear. ...
#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-02-02 10:09 PM | Reply
Post a comment The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed. Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it. Username: Password: Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2025 World Readable
The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2025 World Readable