Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Saturday, February 22, 2025

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau delivered his nation's greatest April Fool's Joke six years ago. Ottawa implemented a federal carbon tax on April 1, 2019, as part of a nationwide effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by slapping a price on carbon pollution. Now, data has confirmed the program neither reduced the nation's emissions nor helped the Canadian people. Will the rest of the world learn from Canada and put the kibosh on this climate policy?

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

How sweet it is. Suck it and make sure you swallow, turdbrain. You are getting played.

#1 | Posted by shoeless at 2025-02-22 06:27 PM | Reply

How sweet it is. Suck it and make sure you swallow, turdbrain. You are getting played.

#1 | Posted by shoeless at 2025-02-22 06:27 PM | Reply | Flag

Now that's not very nice. I'm guessing the article was written above your drop out grade level of comprehension?

#2 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-02-22 06:54 PM | Reply

A less politically-shaped, and more data-shaped view ...

How Well Do Carbon Taxes Match Their Promise? A New Proposed Metric (2023)
taxfoundation.org

...
Key Findings

- - - Carbon taxes are a popular solution to climate change because they are an economically efficient way to price in negative externalities of greenhouse gas emissions.

- - - In practice, carbon taxes have been partial measures, either exempting certain sectors of the economy or offering substantially reduced rates for certain activities.

- - - One way to judge the design and administration of carbon taxes is by measuring the ratio of actual revenue collected divided by potential revenue, known as a c-efficiency ratio. The resulting ratio illustrates how well the tax captures the theoretical tax base.

- - - The Canadian territories of Northwest Territories and British Columbia, as well as Japan and Luxembourg, performed the best, with c-efficiency ratios around or above 0.6.

- - - The average c-efficiency ratio of the jurisdictions studied is 0.29, and the weighted average c-efficiency ratio is 0.24.

- - - Some countries employ multiple carbon pricing systems, often for different sectors of the economy, which explains some carbon taxes' lower c-efficiency ratios.

- - - The high c-efficiency ratios of some high-income jurisdictions that rely heavily on carbon taxes show it is a viable policy tool for capturing its desired tax base.
...



#3 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-02-22 07:39 PM | Reply

~ A less politically-shaped, and more data-shaped view ...

Meaning fvck the article and the data so we can make up some bullschitt that fits the narrative? Preciate it. Now go bust out in a '70s song.

#4 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-02-22 08:07 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort