DOJ Handling of Pam Bondi's Brother's Cases Raises Eyebrows
Democrats in the House and Senate have written to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi, saying they are worried the Department of Justice (DOJ) is favoring the clients of a particular attorney: her brother.
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
LampLighter
Joined 2013/04/13Visited 2025/12/17
Status: user
MORE STORIES
US gov launches 'Tech Force' to replace IT staff DOGE fired (2 comments) ...
Live cameras are tracking faces in New Orleans (2 comments) ...
DOJ Handling of Pam Bondi's Brother's Cases Raises Eyebrows (1 comments) ...
Trump: When Will Polls Reflect Greatest Economy in History (11 comments) ...
Congress Tries to Pull War Powers Back From the White House (3 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
More from the article ...
... The letter, led by two Californians"Senator Adam Schiff and Representative Dave Min"said there had been a number of decisions that raised concerns that there were not enough barriers in place to keep the attorney general away from Brad Bondi's cases. "Viewed collectively, these actions raise significant broader ethical concerns," the 11 Democrats wrote. "The repetition and timing of these interventions suggest coordinated decision-making rather than routine prosecutorial discretion." Newsweek reached out to the DOJ via contact form and Brad Bondi via email for comment on Tuesday morning. Why It Matters The DOJ and wider federal government have rules and regulations in place meant to keep family members from benefiting from their relative's position, in this case, the attorney general. As part of that, the attorney general is supposed to remove themselves from any cases where there may be a conflict of interest. The Democrats behind the letter want to know if these processes were adhered to. ...
"Viewed collectively, these actions raise significant broader ethical concerns," the 11 Democrats wrote. "The repetition and timing of these interventions suggest coordinated decision-making rather than routine prosecutorial discretion."
Newsweek reached out to the DOJ via contact form and Brad Bondi via email for comment on Tuesday morning.
Why It Matters
The DOJ and wider federal government have rules and regulations in place meant to keep family members from benefiting from their relative's position, in this case, the attorney general. As part of that, the attorney general is supposed to remove themselves from any cases where there may be a conflict of interest. The Democrats behind the letter want to know if these processes were adhered to. ...
#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-12-17 12:31 AM | Reply
Post a comment The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed. Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it. Username: Password: Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy
The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy