Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, December 24, 2025

US authorities have discovered more than a million more documents potentially related to the late paedophile Jeffrey Epstein that they plan to release in the coming days and weeks, officials say. The US Attorney for the Southern District of New York and the FBI have informed the Department of Justice (DoJ) about the discovery and turned over the documents for lawyers to review.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

"We have lawyers working around the clock to review and make the legally required redactions to protect victims, and we will release the documents as soon as possible," the DoJ said on social media on Wednesday. The department said that given the volume of material, the process could take "a few more weeks".

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

"redactions to protect victims"

They misspelled Trump.

#1 | Posted by Corky at 2025-12-24 05:06 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"Names of alleged co-conspirators redacted

Some references to "10 Co-conspirators" in FBI communications in 2019 have also been redacted. One July 7, 2019 email with the subject line "Co-conspirators" redacts what appear to be the names of several co-conspirators, although it names Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell, as well as "Wexner" and "Brunel."

The emails come a day after Epstein was arrested on federal sex trafficking charges.

"Of the 10 co-conspirators, 3 have been located in FL and served GJ subpoenas; 1 in Boston, 1 in NYC, and 1 in CT were located and served. 4 of the 10 are outstanding with attempts having been made," another email sent in July 2019 reads, with the names of the sender and recipient redacted.

"In 2019, Trump's DOJ had a list of 10 Epstein co-conspirators," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D, NY) posted on X. "Who are these 10 co-conspirators? Why haven't we seen those memos? Where are the grand jury records? Where are the FBI records? What are they hiding?"

time.com

more

www.youtube.com

#2 | Posted by Corky at 2025-12-24 05:28 PM | Reply

Wow, not only are Trump and Epstein identified in an infanticide reported in the 1984, Thiel and Musk are both named in the Epstein documents.

Beatrice Keul's documentation proves Epstein and Trump were the only "attendees" at Marlago "beauty pagent" parties.

"Anti-Christ", indeed.

#3 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2025-12-24 05:42 PM | Reply

"Anti-Christ", indeed.

Christ died for our sins = Christ.

Everyone else has to suffer or die for Trumpy's sins = Anti-Christ.

#4 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-12-24 05:44 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"An FBI intake document dated July 2020 contains a shocking allegation from a woman who says she was trafficked as a child in the UK and taken to abuse "parties" connected to Epstein's network.

SHe says that between the ages of 6 and 8, she was drugged by her father and driven to a private estate in Surrey, where she was hit by a dark blue car driven by Prince Andrew. The impact caused permanent injuries to her ribs, hip, and leg.

She says she later woke up to Prince Andrew standing over her.

She also claims she was taken to another house, identified later as Frogmore Cottage, where she was restrained, tortured with electric shocks by Ghislaine Maxwell, and watched by a group of men.

She says Maxwell beat her with a brook, broke her nose, and told her she "deserved to die."

Medical records are mentioned in the report, but the victim says she was only taken to the hospital after a rugby match to cover the real cause of her injuries."

#5 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2025-12-24 05:50 PM | Reply

brook is broom.

Source: DOJ doc, EFTA00020457

#6 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2025-12-24 05:51 PM | Reply

Yeah, apparently this Gang That Couldn't Redact Straight are also terrible at tech... people are opening files the weren't supposed be able to see.

#7 | Posted by Corky at 2025-12-24 05:53 PM | Reply

In spite of what Pres Trump seems to want...

                            The Epstein Files are not going away anytime soon ...

#8 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-12-24 05:54 PM | Reply

@#7 ... Yeah, apparently this Gang That Couldn't Redact Straight are also terrible at tech... people are opening files the weren't supposed be able to see. ...

Again as I understand it, the problem is that the redaction of text is done by changing the font and background color of the redacted text to black-on-black. So the black text cannot be seen against the black background.

As the DoJ seems to be finding out that does not make the text ~go away.~ It merely makes the text difficult to be read.

All one has to do is highlight the redacted area, do a copy 'n' paste of the underlying text, and, paste it somewhere without the color attributes tagging along. Or paste it with th black-on-black color attributes, and then change the colors to black-on-white, or whatever floats yer boat.


#9 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-12-24 06:25 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort