Advertisement
2 Months Ago: Tulsi Gabbard Said US 'Cycle Of Regime Change' Was Over
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard told a crowd in October that the "counterproductive and endless cycle of regime change or nation-building" was over" a little over a month before President Donald Trump's military actions in Venezuela.
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
Reinheitsgebot
Joined 2006/11/29Visited 2026/01/05
Status: user
MORE STORIES
2 Months Ago: Tulsi Gabbard Said US 'Cycle Of Regime Change' Was Over (3 comments) ...
MAGAts Link Maduro Kidnapping To 2020 Election (3 comments) ...
Elon Musk's AI Floods Twitter with Inappropriate Photos (6 comments) ...
Cuba says 32 of its Citizens were Killed During Maduro Extraction (21 comments) ...
Slain Minnesota Lawmaker's Children call on Trump to Remove Video (7 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
When has regime change ever worked out well for America in modern history?[image or embed] -- Wajahat Ali (@wajali.bsky.social) Jan 3, 2026 at 2:55 PM
When has regime change ever worked out well for America in modern history?[image or embed]
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
... the "counterproductive and endless cycle of regime change or nation-building" was over" a little over a month before President Donald Trump's military actions in Venezuela. ...
Quelle surprise.
The Trump admin lied on a quite significant issue, yet again.
#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-01-04 10:09 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
Here's an interesting view ...
U.S. regime change under Trump 2.0: Empire at a crossroads (March 2025) www.bjreview.com
... Donald Trump was elected U.S. president in 2016 with a platform opposing regime change. After four years, his administration attempted to overthrow the Venezuelan regime by violently appointing an unelected puppet Juan Guaido as the "interim president," covertly continuing President Barack Obama's efforts to overthrow the Syrian Government, and nearly taking the U.S. to war with Iran through the assassination of top Iranian general Qassem Soleimani. In 2024, Trump was elected again by an even stronger margin on the platform of being a "peacemaker." The question is: Will this be the moment when a U.S. president truly changes the course of American foreign policy away from regime change wars and toward peace? The U.S. has conducted hundreds of regime change operations since World War II and has been successful in dozens. However, regime change comes with costs. America's shrinking share of global economic influence and its overextended military power has led to a reliance on proxy wars, covert operations, and shock and awe wars of aggression. The result: chronic instability, chaos and economic impoverishment, to which Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Ukraine and several other nations can attest. ... Trump's early foreign policy record indicates a dire need for Americans to understand "regime change" in a deeper way. Yes, regime change means the overthrow of governments, but the overthrow of governments is never without purpose. The purpose is the maintenance and expansion of U.S. imperial domination, and therefore all forms of U.S. interventionism are in a way linked to regime change. While Trump claims not to pursue direct regime change of any particular country, his administration's foreign policy remains committed to upholding U.S. dominance and the political manipulation required to achieve this. ...
The U.S. has conducted hundreds of regime change operations since World War II and has been successful in dozens. However, regime change comes with costs. America's shrinking share of global economic influence and its overextended military power has led to a reliance on proxy wars, covert operations, and shock and awe wars of aggression. The result: chronic instability, chaos and economic impoverishment, to which Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Ukraine and several other nations can attest. ...
Trump's early foreign policy record indicates a dire need for Americans to understand "regime change" in a deeper way. Yes, regime change means the overthrow of governments, but the overthrow of governments is never without purpose. The purpose is the maintenance and expansion of U.S. imperial domination, and therefore all forms of U.S. interventionism are in a way linked to regime change. While Trump claims not to pursue direct regime change of any particular country, his administration's foreign policy remains committed to upholding U.S. dominance and the political manipulation required to achieve this. ...
Prescient?
#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-01-04 10:15 PM | Reply
---- that Russian stooge
#3 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-01-04 11:39 PM | Reply
Post a comment The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed. Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it. Username: Password: Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy
The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy