snip ...

Dear Jonas: Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America. Denmark cannot protect that land from Russia or China, and why do they have a "right of ownership" anyway? There are no written documents, it's only that a boat landed there hundreds of years ago, but we had boats landing there, also. I have done more for NATO than any other person since its founding, and now, NATO should do something for the United States. The World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland.

Thank you!

President DJT

How much of something like this does Trump really believe? You never know, but it's probably a lot. For the record, Trump did not stop eight wars plus, there are MANY written documents (including some signed by the U.S.) confirming Demark's relationship with Greenland, Trump has done nothing for NATO (much less more than any person since its founding), and "a boat landed there hundreds of years ago" could also describe the United States' claim to ITS territory.

We'll also note the disrespect entailed in using the PM's given name, rather than his title and last name. There's also the problem of holding Store responsible for what the Norwegian Nobel Committee does; that's like blaming Trump if Leonardo DiCaprio does not win the Oscar for Best Actor this year. Finally, note that this administration does not seem to notice (or maybe it doesn't care about) the implications of its words. That first sentence makes very clear that, at least up until this year's Nobel Peace Prize was announced, Trump was sometimes putting his personal needs ahead of those of the United States. But at least he's not going to do that anymore. Right?

snip ...

Francis Fukuyama: The prominent political scientist, and one-time neoconservative, actually shared his views on YouTube on Sunday, but they didn't get public attention until yesterday. In the latest installment of Frankly Fukuyama, the Stanford prof opined:

I want to say this straight out: as an American, I have one thing to say to my many European friends"do not back down in this confrontation. Up to now, both the E.U. and the major European powers have sought to appease Trump by offering him concessions, flattery, personal gifts, and other forms of tribute. This strategy has not worked and should be abandoned immediately. Donald Trump is fundamentally a bully who wants to dominate everyone around him.

Trying to placate him with concessions is a fool's errand. He despises weakness and those who display it. Last spring, the E.U. cut a trade deal with him that accepted a 15% tariff on all European goods with no retaliation against American products. This was a bad decision. The E.U., which in terms of population and wealth is on a par with the United States, should have taken a common position and retaliated. What makes any European think that conceding Greenland will mollify Trump? He will simply come back for more later.

The arguments that Europeans have used for a concessionary policy is that they are still dependent on the United States for security and need help in dealing with Russia. They also argue that they don't want to provoke a mutually destructive trade war. But at this point, Trump's America has amply demonstrated that it will not be a reliable ally when push comes to shove.

It has already abandoned Ukraine and stated in its national security strategy document that Europe has fallen behind the Western Hemisphere in terms of American priorities. Europeans should keep in mind that those countries that stood up to Trump's threats in 2025, which include Brazil, India, and China, have actually done well for themselves. They've increased domestic support, and in the case of China, they forced America to back down.

My European friends need to keep in mind that Donald Trump is not the United States. A majority of Americans are dismayed and outraged by his policies, and they will likely vote against him and the Republican Party in the coming November election. It may be the case that the world will have to suffer a global recession as more countries stand up to Trump and retaliate against his policies. But a U.S. politician who wants to weaponize trade and use it as an instrument for territorial aggrandizement really needs to be stopped. Thanks for listening.

We don't see anything there we disagree with. And we are confident that world leaders and their advisors, around the globe, have done this same analysis. They just can't say it out loud, like Fukuyama can.