Ths article doesn't even define the characteristics of press freedom.

Blocking the Jet Blue merger certainly didn't improve Spirit's chances.

" Domestic Extremist
@RussianMeddler
1. Can a white person be effectively represented by a black congressman?

2. Can a black person be effectively represented by a white congressman?

If your answer to either of these questions is "no" then you are the racist"

But when the left views EVERYTHING through the lens of race ...

" Blacks make up 33% of Louisiana, yet will have a majority in only 1 of 6 districts.

You've purposely diluted the power to vote, then championed their "power to vote".

That's ugly racism, paraded as empowerment.

Here's hoping there's a special place in hell for these folks.

#15 | POSTED BY DANFORTH AT 2026-05-02 01:50 AM | FLAG: "

6 New England states are 40% Republican with 0 House reps. Then let's look at what just happened in Virginia. Further, aren't we supposed to be an integrated society? Why do you presume Latinos and blacks share ZERO political interests with whites and Asians?

We aren't supposed to discriminate based on race, yet that's exactly what has been happening. Democrats have segregated minorities into single communities based upon absurd geographical district maps.

You race baiters are gross.

And it's not about minority votes. It's about drawing districts to benefit the Democrat Party. That's the reason the left is freaking out over this.

" Draw districts to separate black voters into minority positions so they have no power.

#12 | POSTED BY SYCOPHANT AT 2026-05-02 01:19 AM | REPLY"

They still have the power to vote. No way you can pull up a district map of, say Illinois, and in any way justify it.

This guy is a Nazi. No wonder Dems are throwing their full support behind him. They love Nazi's.

A sim0le look at Louisiana's district map tells anyone with an ounce of sense that SCOTUS got this right.

Segregating people by race is so on point for Democrats.

Nerfherder is scruffy looking.

" I believe that is the main reason why he supports Janet Mills over Platner"

He probably doesn't like Platner's Nazi tattoo. Regardless, it doesn't matter. Nt sure if you heard, Mills suspended her campaign.

" It is not welcomed here.

#140 | POSTED BY A_FRIEND AT 2026-04-30 11:59 PM | FLAG: "

IDGAF.

Unless Rcade tells me to stop posting I I will say whatever the ---- I want.

" Based on the popularity of progressive candidates like Mamdani, Talarico, and Crockett, and the continued enthusiasm for Bernie and AOC, I'm not too sure where you believe you see democrats having moved on."

Madmani ran against a corrupt and hated has-been. Crocket is about to be unemployed. Talarico hasn't even won anything and is likely Beto 2.0. AOC got elected in a very blue district. What none of these people have is broad national appeal, especially with the middle. All of which is the point of this thread.

Democrats controlled the House for 40 years. Why? They were the party of the working class. They didn't need identity politics, DEI, open borders or any of that. They were popular and had lots of power because they represented workers. If they can find a way to get back to that they'd be able to relegate the GOP into the weeds.

#2. What a great movie clip. Absolutely hilarious.

" If you're against spending, but silent on tax giveaways"

If you support tax increases but are silent on spending you don't deserve a seat at the adult table.

" When did that epiphany happen? Before noon. today, or after?

#37 | POSTED BY DANFORTH AT 2026-04-30 02:12 PM | FLAG: "

I've been saying it for years. FICA should be increased a half point on both sides.

I've also been screaming for spending cuts. Real cuts not just reductions in the rate of growth that still vastly outpaces inflation.

#34. Completely agree. We do need intelligent tax increases but we desperately need to reduce spending and address our unsustainable spending trajectory. Right now neither party is even remotely serious about addressing any of this.

Republicans are part of the problem. They are more of the problem than Democrats are going back three decades. What everyone (that is YOU, Danforth) refuse to answer is what are Democrats proposing NOW that will in any way meaningfully address this going forward.

Rand Paul has proposed the 6 cents rule. What are Democrats proposing? Paul Ryan seriously talked about our debt and spending trajectory and was subject to ads off him pushing wheelchair bound grannies over a cliff by Democrats as a response.

He promised "Hope and Change" and once elected embraced Sharpton as his race point person.

"If I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon."

Effing POS. No wonder Danforth adores him.

You didn't answer my question. I knew you couldn't.

Obama betrayed America. He set race relations back by at least a decade and all for cynical power.

Danforth,

Please show me what Democrats are proposing that even remotely addresses this problem.

Show your work.

It should be easy given your unadorned love for the Democrat Party.

Do you think Kimmel is funny? I've seen a few clips and what I've seen wasn't funny

Why are you such an ankle biter anyway?