"NOT A SINGLE LINK"

That's a lie, I gave multiple links. It's not my fault you couldn't understand them.

You posted an article admitting the top 1% got roughly 83% of the tax cuts.

That means if the .1% got just 60% of the cuts for the top 1%...that means the top .1% got MORE THAN HALF the Trump 1.0 tax cuts...and that's BEFORE counting interest, where you conflated direct ownership with direct and indirect ownership.

60% of the 1%'s tax cuts going to the .1% makes sense, since all lower tenths-of-a-percentile have relatively small windows. But once you get to the .1%...you could be talking millions, or hundreds of millions, or billions; there's NO window cap. It makes sense the bulk of the cuts lean toward the top of the scale.

But I get it: you don't understand the underlying math.

"You cheered everything on that list under (D)."

Nonsense.

I demanded you prove your claims of censorship, lawfare, or corruption, which you NEVER could. Not once.

You couldn't find a single piece of lawfare.
You couldn't find a single piece of censorship.
You couldn't find a single piece of Joe Biden's corruption.

And the "corruption" you accused HB of, you complete overlook when it's Ja(R)ed. $2 million is supposed to be unforgivable, while $2 billion is entrepreneurial.

"In your setting as it cannot possibly mean Teachers Assistant for you "

Okay, you're a moron.

Got it.

"Dude - you LOST - BIGLY. I'

I brought math.

You didn't understand the big numbers.

And ever since, you've been running a home run trot, all while the catcher has been holding strike three.

"Everyone knows that is what it means in a traditional sense. "

You didn't seem to. In what educational setting is TA "---- and ass"?

"I can only assume you were turning tricks for your third rate professor"

Like I said, nobody brings up these topics except the overly repressed.

You're a gay man stuck in a closet.

But that's okay. Just get help. There's nothing wrong with being a gay man.

"that's one of the first places I'd look for criminals who want to skeet under the radar."

Riiiiight.

I'm sure that's the threat to America, and not all the gangs Trump promised to eradicate on day one.

Is that water getting heavy to carry, day after day?

"Danforth sometimes excoriates me for not creating "Trump is Satan's boss" threads."

Heavens, no.

I'm just excoriating you for ignoring Trump is Using the Office to Grift Millions
And Trump Denying Due Process
And Trump Weaponizing the DOJ
And Trump's Kids Profiting from Daddy's Name/Office
And Trump Appoints Brainworm Victim

You know...all the things you'd be SCREECHING about if there was a (D) after the name.

Maybe it's time to post a thread about Obama's tan suit?

"The reality is, there are more dangerous illegal immigrants to prioritize on deporting than people who pick fruits and veggies or wash dishes."

Absolutely! We know where the REAL threats are!!

TO HOME DEPOT!!!

"I so thoroughly exposed..."

What a riot.

All you exposed is you didn't understand your own posts, or the math behind ANY of it.

First, you posted an article about how much wealthy Americans got from the Trump tax code...but didn't realize it left out how much wealthy FOREIGNERS got from the tax code. Then, you couldn't fathom the wealthiest .1% got 60% of the tax cuts going to the top 10%, which is ludicrous once you realize every OTHER income bracket has a narrow window, compared with the BILLIONS and BILLIONS at the top (since the average Billionaire is worth $5.3 Billion). Finally, when it came to interest, you exposed your ignorance AGAIN, this time about ownership, stupidly claiming DIRECT ownership numbers also included INDIRECT ownership, an assumption which doesn't pass the smell test: that the world's wealthiest .1% don't hold ANY indirect US Treasuries. Ludicrous. And you put all this barf into AI, and think you're product is worthwhile.

You're the G in GIGO.

"You were the '---- and ass' for the professor? Yeah, I guess I can see that."

You don't know TA stands for Teaching Assistant? Yeah, I guess I can believe that.

"2 years of inflation?"

6.5%? ---- straight.

BTW, anyone blaming Biden for the inflation, without admitting Trump wanted a 42% LARGER stimulus (meaning worse inflation), is a math moron or a chickenschittt.

Biden brought down inflation further, faster than any of the G7 countries, and handed off an economy the WSJ admitted was "the envy of the world".

Clearly, ETTD.

"When it comes to deportation please expound what you mean when you say "due process". "

You posted: "He entered illegally and that is beyond dispute. That means he's deportable."

That does NOT, in and of itself, constitute a deportable offense...NOT UNTIL THAT HAS BEEN ADJUDICATED BY A COURT. You know..."Due Process".

"An increase from 2.1%-6.5% is a 'price spike' now? "

Two years of inflation overnight? YES, dumfuq.

"It seems that you already studied that in college'

Econ? I was actually the TA.

"when you weren't wasting your time blowing your fellow interpretive dance majors."

Since that never happened, I'll assume this is your fantasy we're dealing with...again.

Duuuuude...it's okay. You can get out of your closet. Here's a hint: NOBODY brings up gay sex in the middle of a discussion, except someone obsessed with gay sex.

"The farmer that I worked for then moved to hiring Mexicans to do the work (many of whom I suspect were illegals)."

Did you turn them in? Why not?

"Then why argue? The market will correct itself.'

Over a few years. Maybe. Or maybe they'll be a new paradigm.

Meanwhile, you're pretending prices won't spike in the interim. Why?

"Average fresh beef (all beef) in the US is $8.15/lb so the processing plant labor component is 2.1% - 6.4%."

Meaning if wages were doubled, the component might raise the cost by up to 6.4%.

Who is pretending this wouldn't cause a price spike???

""If we don't have AA's to pick our cotton, how's anyone going to be able to afford clothes"?"

I don't mind paying fair wages.

What bothers me is morons pretending these actions won't jack up prices.

"There is a worker shortage because the wages are suppressed by an endless flood of illegals."

I'll take How To Flunk Econ 101 in One Statement for $2,000, Kenny.

"Awe, look at the left going bonkers over losing their slave labor..."

Aw, look at the right, giving every excuse why prices will be going UP, not down.

Even better: pretending folks like them are going to scramble for those juicy meat-packing jobs!

"People say, well, just double or triple the pay. You'll get United States citizens to work. No, you won't."

ScottS's plan is American workers get SO desperate after AI, they start picking crops. Success! MAGA!!!

"So now your argument is switching to it is unreasonable to expect people to relocate to where there are actually jobs?'

It's not just that; these folks are nomads.

Americans are not going to leave their suburbs, and drive to central California, and then to the next harvest, and then the next.

"So now your argument is switching to it is unreasonable to expect people to relocate to where there are actually jobs?"

Overnight? Yeah. In a year or two? Still yeah.

I'm also saying your plan is a total bust, due to your completely unrealistic grasp of what you're actually proposing. For one thing, NO ONE is going to double the lettuce picker's pay.

"Under my scenario, these guys are more than doubling JWP wages..."

As usual, your math skills flunk the most basic challenges. Are you trying to be a WOB?

"so you are on the record stating that Americans won't do ag work for over $33/hour.'

I'm saying they won't drive to Modesto from, say, St. Louis. Do you disagree?