#65

GFY. You cheered when Trump made it worse.

Like that orange pus, you want the issue as a political wedge. You've never wanted to address the root, ever.

Hell, you don't even have the class to admit hirers are the problem.

#64

I've got no problems with deporting criminals who have been adjudicated as criminals.

I have a YUUUUGE problem with deporting non-criminals who might not even have been accused.

Why don't you?

" THEY ALL NEED TO GO BACK."

What a riot. Not even 25% will go back.

Donald Trump is playing you for a fool. He's going to exempt MOST OF THEM. Meatpacking workers, restaurant workers, hotel workers, farm workers. Eventually, he'll add construction workers, covering The Big Five.

By the time he's done, he'll be Reagan on steroids.

Your claim of "ALL", as usual, is Republican Math.

" fighting tooth and nail to not have violent illegals deported,"

On the contrary: all they asked was the Constitution be followed, YOU'RE the one schitting on due process.

For example, you can't prove the overall claim you've made. Where have the courts proven the "violent" part you're stating? They haven't.

That's fascism.

Because if all that's needed is an accusation ...

... it seems we have video of you talking to your lawn crew ...

So ... off to El Salvador with you! Adios!

Where are our resident screechers, warning us about the severe danger to our Constitution?

What (R)easons could they have for avoiding the obvious?!?

" ICE has been very clear. They are going after criminals"

By criminals, are you referring to those whose only crime is being illegally here, or those who committed additional legal offenses?

I was promised the latter, but I keep getting the former.

" awarding one to obama before he even took office."

What "news" outlet is lying to you about this?

"$1B of taxpayer dollars to retrofit a plane that will probably never be used."

Oh it'll be used.

It'll be used for a nine-figure charitable deduction when Trump transfers ownership to his Presidential Library.

Maybe ten figures, after the upgrades.

" I hate typing on my phone and I hate auto correct."

Try dictating "self-own".

You're NOT going to get a hyphenated word.

" His (contract) expires May 2026. It's not being renewed."

And?

ABC took Rosanne off immediately. CBS could've done the same thing. And, according to their own claims, save about $25-30 million.

You know ... it being a purely financial decision, and all.

" Horowitz confirmed this back in 2019."

Horowitz's central takeaway was there was ample reason to open and continue the investigation.

Yes, he pointed to mistakes, but that doesn't change the central tenet of the report.

Why are you misrepresenting, again?

" It was used in 3 Carter Page FISA warrants. Insiders told Brennan they lacked intel to continue"

FISA warrants aren't renewed unless new information has come since the prior warrant was issued.

In Carter Page's situation, while there was nothing new, CP was still telling the FBI the Russians were trying to recruit him.

Had the situation been reversed, and the FBI had proof of, say, HRC and Huma meeting with the Chinese ...

... and they hadn't investigated it, folks would be finding pieces of your exploded head all across the Midwest.

" The investigation would have been halted for lack of intel without the inclusion of the dossier."

Nonsense.

Every time Team Trump lied about contacts with Russians, it added new impetus.

To the larger point: why are you OK with team Trump lying about over 100 contacts with Russians?

" I said it was central."

Then you're still full of bullschittt.

The central reason was Team Trump kept lying about contacts with Russia, while the FBI was seeing meeting after meeting with Russians they were surveilling.

You know, the type of thing that would explode your head if the letters after the name were reversed.

And the idea Obama was SPYING on the campaign?!? FFS, Jeff Sessions walked into the (surveilled) Russian's office, and the FBI kept recording.

Turncoats believe that's when the FBI should've STOPPED recording.

" the whole E/O is to get homeless people off the street."

And you actually believe Trump will restrict himself to the boundaries of the law?!?

Have you met him?

" The ICA's stated that there wasn't enough to continue moving forward which is why the Steele Dossier was incorporated."

Link to that specific statement, please.

" Are you saying the Steele Dossier wasn't used at all?"

No, I'm pointing out any suggestion it was the original impetus for investigating the Trump campaign is a bald-faced lie.

" if it weren't for the fact that Hillary/The DNC paid fines totaling $113,000 for their part in the hoax."

That wasn't what the fine was for. What "news" outlet is telling you that lie?

And "for the fact", followed by a lie?!? GTFOH.

" Just need 1 to flip - maybe it will be Brennan, maybe it will be Comey. At least 1 will flip and then your whole world view comes crashing down."

You made basically the same claim six years ago.

You looked foolish during Durham 1.0, and six years later, have learned nothing.

Durham 2.0 won't even have a meaningless sideline conviction for show, like the first round.

" after the lawfare they did against Trump."

What a riot.

You can't point to a single indictment of Trump which you or I could do without fear of legal repercussions.

That's not LAWFARE, that's LAW.

You're whining that the guy you support is a crook.

" The Steele Dossier was central to all of this."

The investigation of Trump began BEFORE The Steele Dossier was uncovered.

" Mueller report anyone?"

You either didn't read it, or didn't understand it. You're misrepresenting it worse than Bill Barr did.

It looks like you're carrying water, again.

" you don't happen to be Brennan, are you?"

You're the moron who predicted Brennan, Comey, and Clapper would all be frog-marched by Durham before the November 2020 elections, which would sweep Trump to re-election with 20%-no 25%!-of the black vote.

How did those predictions work out for you? Ever get all that egg off your face? Was that the reason you changed your handle, again?

This manure is Durham 2.0.

#38

Oh ffs, just admit you're afraid to re-watch the video and leave it at that.

You're the poster child for YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH.

" You are using your OPINION "

WATCH THE VIDEO.

If it's not your opinion after watching the video, you're a hopeless moron.

If you want to be taken seriously, have the nads to admit when something is this painfully obvious.

" A week ago Tulsi Gabbard unleashed a bit of an Obama-scandal bomb"

Only for the morons and the brain-dead. Which are you?

Those with room temp IQs or higher can see this is a nothingburger inside a nothingburger. The Rubio Report wasn't negated, or even referenced, a clear admission it can't be refuted.

" You correctly make fun of Fox News but this crap is actually more absurd."

I have 787,000,000 reasons why you're wrong.