Oh boy. The next Democrat president is really going to hear about this.

Do y'all remember who Bolton is and what he stands for? He is a hard core war monger. He has recently advocated war with Iran, Venezuela and a large expansion of our recent war in Syria. Pick a side, Bolton wants war as a remedy to every problem.

#30 | POSTED BY DOCNJO

Side already picked. Knowing that Bolton is a terrible person doesn't mean that we have to ignore the truth he brings.

Trump picked Bolton and Trump supporters defended it. How many associates has Trump turned on and vice versa? His "best people" suddenly become the worst people the very second they're hired? How many times is it going to have to take before Trump's supporters realize he has no idea what he's doing?

I never would have imagined that a fraud like Trump could somehow make millions of people suddenly really stupid. Incredible.

It's amazing how much Dems can't stand contributions to Trump yet the millions that Russia gave to Hillary is just fine to them!

2) FACT CHECK!!! The Dems' best friend for making up claims without evidence and thinking they are facts.

#15 | POSTED BY HUMTAKE

Fact check - you fell for something that started out as a hoax on Facebook.

Is it as easy to tell the the difference between actual identity issues and a man who is lying to get into a woman's locker room?

#24 | POSTED BY GOATMAN

Sure. Men lying to get into women's locker rooms usually get arrested.

"It's pretty easy to tell the difference between actual identity issues and a man who is lying for personal benefit."
You can tell?

Is that your superpower?

It must be, because I can't tell.

#9 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

It was easy enough for the Miami PD to tell. Doesn't need superpowers, just some common sense.

Anger at Trump but no anger at Iran for actually causing the injury.

"All is well!" - Donald Trump

Yet another example of "no obstruction!" in Trump World.

What does this have to with the topic, zed.

It shows more Trump admin coddling of white supremacy, just like Boaz's Fox article.

It seems he should have the right to identify as to however he feels.

#1 | POSTED BY GOATMAN

It's pretty easy to tell the difference between actual identity issues and a man who is lying for personal benefit.

Huh. Trump and his gullible pretend medical experts claimed they were just some "headaches".

Good thing some white supremacists got arrested before the rally started.

"I don't see her in Beijing or Delhi."

130 countries are represented at Davos, including China and India.

But she's not doing enough because she's not talking to... less countries???

I'm surprised McConnell didn't insist on the milk being warmed up first, or the playing of lullabies.

No point in wasting time listening to schitthead repeat his talking points for the 1000th time.

#3 | POSTED BY NULLIFIDIAN

It would be a little more interesting if Republicans allowed witnesses and new evidence. You know, like how trials are actually supposed to work.

But Republicans know "nothing new" is all they've got, and they know people like you will easily fall for it.

The rest of us understand sarcasm and hyperbole.

#4 | POSTED BY VISITOR

Yeah, sending Rudy all the way to Ukraine is just goofing around! Chill out, dudes! All serious foreign policy should be based on sarcasm and hyperbole!

What's to say this guy thinks the exact same thing, he thinks he is an 8 year old girl? What are you going to do? Prove him wrong?

#13 | POSTED BY BOAZ

It's pretty easy to tell the difference between trans folk and a 45 year-old convicted sex offender pretending to be a little girl.

Feigning ignorance isn't a very good anti-trans argument, but I guess it's all y'all have.

Ho hum. Just another hysterical leftist screed.

#2 | POSTED BY NULLIFIDIAN

Yeah, it's not as if a dozen or so Trump associates have been charged with committing crimes.

He asked legitimate questions and no answers have been linked or provided. This is a troll thread.

#31 | POSTED BY JEFFJ

Somebody needs to hire an investigator. We've never seen pictures of people on buildings before.

When Kenneth Starr led the impeachment effort against former President Bill Clinton, Trump was not a fan.

"I think Ken Starr's a lunatic," Trump said at the time. "I really think that Ken Starr is a disaster. I really think that Ken Starr was terrible," he added.

In another interview, this time with Geraldo Rivera when Hillary Clinton was running for state senator of New York, Trump brought up Starr's name again.

"[Bill Clinton] had a very tough life the last few years," Trump said. "I mean, what could be tougher than that? I mean, can you imagine those evenings when he's just being lambasted by this crazy Ken Starr, who is a total wacko? There's the guy. I mean, he is totally off his rocker."

The judge apparently did not find this argument persuasive. No reasonable person would. But an obvious question is raised here. Why exactly can't Gobrick identity as a young girl? On what basis can we deny or disqualify his self-identification?

Idiot Walsh answers his own stupid question before asking the stupid question. Wow.

It's not rocket science. The sex offender has no argument. It's not the same as real trans issues.

"I'll argue against good people transitioning, but why can't a convicted sex offender identify as a young girl to commit more crimes?" - idiot transphobes

"Hyde? I don't know him. Never heard of him."

- future Trump statement

#10 | POSTED BY RIGHTOCENTER

Reality check:

The Senate passed the U.S.-Mexico Canada Agreement on Thursday with overwhelming bipartisan support in an 89-10 vote. The deal is now headed to the White House, where President Donald Trump is expected to sign it.

Democratic lawmakers and the White House have both claimed victory for changes made to the major North American trade deal, which won approval from the House of Representatives last month after more than a year of deadlock.

For Democrats, the backing of labor unions was vital to their support of the deal, as was the securing of environmental protections and the removal of a provision that would have given the pharmaceutical industry more intellectual property protection.

Undoubtedly if Trump had said Americans were injured, the usual suspects would be whining that Trump was just trying to stir up sympathy for support of war.

#1 | POSTED BY GOATMAN

No, we'd be shocked that he actually told the truth for once.

#3 | POSTED BY BOAZ

Maybe because it's fake news? Only 8% of blacks voted for Trump in 2016 and support is still around that now.