"complete lack of humility."

It's clear twoothy drinks a couple gallons of humility every day.

Which is really why he is such a sore loser wrapped in envy and hostility. Always a victim.

It started way before Trump and it will continue to his grave.

-Is that you jeff?

So Bell is harming your family.

The son of a bitch is harming mine.

Motherfukker ... ..LOL

221

Okay ... ..that's funny. A blazing saddles reference is always appropriate and hilarious

From 10,000 feet ... ..Kansas, commercial insurance broker. Registered Republican only because we have closed primaries and p
Because it's a very red district/state, primary elections choose my representatives ... ..so I vote that primary. If we moved to a similar blue district then I'd switch parties.

Kids all went to Catholic School. Last one graduates this year.

-So you're taking credit for me not talking about my personal life?

Yes

-I don't recall.

So, no ... .you haven't. You tried that route once, I came along and challenged your bullshit so you stopped.

You learned your lesson.

Don't ever fukkin do it again.

-I engage with people who are harming my loved ones.

That must mean he's harming my loved ones.

How on earth is it possible any of you can harm my loved ones?

Aside from outing my personal identity ... ... of course.

"I revealed some facts about my life that you didn't believe"

Have you done that since? Revealed "facts" about your life?

I haven't seen you do that since. Just curious.

-How much time did you spend trying to get personal details about my life?

let's see......zero seconds.

However, I did spend some time slapping you in kind for following me from thread to thread blaming me for your ---- life. Blaming me for being a registered republican when I've made it quite clear why I am...and it's not because I subscribe to the ideals of the republican party.

And my positions and posts here prove it.

But you're not satisfied. You're convinced I've done something to you.

-Meanwhile, the homeowners' insurance companies are looking at the long haul, not just today's (insurance premium) commissions.

Actually, after dealing with P&C insurance companies for over 25 years, I'll tell you they don't think "long term" as you might believe.

They want everyone to think they look at the long haul but in reality......they are very reactionary. They aren't remotely proactive.

Take the wildfires in california for example. very profitable state year after year....but the data and models said "wildfires coming....huge huge losses". What did they do? nothing.

Insurance companies are way way way too greedy to look at the long haul.

"insurance companies are pulling back from high-risk areas due to climate change by limiting new policies, non-renewing existing ones, and raising premiums and deductibles."

very true, and insurance companies spend a lot of money utilizing weather data to develop models that helps them price and program where they want to write....and keep them away from where they want to avoid.

I think Florida has seen the best example of the insurability (or lack thereof) of homes and how it can impact the value.

But it's not that hostile in the fact that values are still strong.

People aren't worried about climate change when looking at where to buy property. It's not a factor.

this is my point.

Much ado about nothing. As usual.

#16 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-11-26 12:01 PM | Reply | Flag: Admitted Climate change denier

-You literally just described the maga movement.

Wow, that's just extra sauce being rubbed into that wound, considering it describes you and twoothy pretty well.

-In what way do I need to be a better person?

maybe resist the urge to doxx other posters here.

maybe stop calling people -----?

Oh, and stop hating people.

139

I'll check some of those programs out

Thanks!!

14

Couldn't agree more.

This has been a recurring argument here over the past few years.

When angst and vitriol are being spewed at deniers I tend to remind people the group of deniers is bigger than they think.

-You also can't seem to grasp J6 was based on a lie,

Yes it was. But I've always wondered how many of the protesters truly believed the lie. That would be a great documentary. Interview the protestors and, in hindsight, try to learn more.

Personally I would love to strap all of them to a polygraph and ask them if they still believe it and did they really believe it at the time. (Trump actually won)

Maybe we would learn they truly believed it then at the time and still now. I don't know ... ..but I'm curious.

-Here's the thing. It has a sea wall. I do not know what else makes the property valuable to the Obama's and sustainable into the future. And neither do any of you.

Climate experts disagree with you and indeed DO know how susceptible that property is. They give time tables on it and predict a lot of very big calamity in the near future. They address the sea walls as well.

It doesn't add up to making that investment.

The property values continue to rise. Sea walls or not.

It's obvious the real estate market is still ignoring the climate crisis

-Political donations and maneuvers are complex and always changing and morphing depending on who is in power and your goals at the time.

Very well said.

8

Pretty harsh position to hit the Obamas with.

I doubt the decision to invest there is based on ignorance.

Your explanation is "Seawall".

But the neighbor with the red hat on who also has a seawall is just ignorant?

LOL

-Because he can? Because it has its own sea wall? Who knows?

How about because they're not worried their significant investment comes with any risk? Because that property isn't really vulnerable to a loss in value due to climate change

-Geez, why in the heck would the Obamas buy a waterfront mansion??????

There is no question that represents evidence that many folks truly doubt the significance of climate change despite their public position.

18

I agree with you but I'm not following your point.

My point earlier is that people scream about the system but they are full of it.

If Peter Theil gave $15 million for Gavin Newsom's campaign for president or senate then the same people attacking this support for Vance would immediately pivot to happiness.

There is zero honesty on this issue.

Perfect example of what I'm talking about

It's not the money. It's not the wealth of the donor

It's who they support.

There should be outrage over it.

But selective outrage is NO outrage. Fake outrage.

-What you need to do is find billionaires to right the good kind of checks, to offset the bad ones.

"Would you STFU for once"

-Corky

-You don't see anything wrong with a billionaire writing checks like that.

Yes. I'm the only one here who actually think it's wrong.