Happy Pride Month JPW, try to take it easy this year; you're not as young and "things" aren't as pliable as they used to be.

#53 | POSTED BY VISITOR

Of course, this stupid piece of s%** goes straight for the gay sex comment.

KeeP deflecting and obfuscating. It's all you clowns have.

#31 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

You support Nero and can't help but be pleased with how well tuned his fiddle is.

You have zero credibility and should just STFU.

Of course, Gutes Deutsch would jump all over this while hmmming and hawwwing over needing more evidence for Trump.

Trump is burning it down and this idiot still can't stop talking about Biden.

Unfortunately, the worst is yet to come.

Because when they realize they were had, again, they'll only get angrier.

When they should be realizing they're poor judges and critical thinkers and should may STFU and sit down, they'll push harder and angrier for what they think should happen.

#8 thank you

#9 it's not so much popularity, but commonality. Again, it's a strategy to directly mitigate the wording of regulations that SCOTUS has said they'll maintain because they pass their own legal test they've established over the last three rulings (Heller, Bruen and Rahimi).

It's even a corporate strategy

No s^%#.

The idiots will continue to ignore it. Because ... they're idiots.

This happened during the first administration. Shouldn't be a surprise this time around.

You left out the millions that would go into poverty and worldwide devastation the planet has never seen before because of Musk.
Sure Corky, take the next 3 years off, you will save yourself from making an even bigger fool of yourself than you already have.

#2 | POSTED BY FISHPAW

lol musk fanboi gaffots are pathetic creatures.

You liberals used Biden just to steal power.

#39 | POSTED BY BOAZ

This from a Trump ------------ idiot who supports this administration's unconstitutional power grabs.

You have zero credibility, s%^*heap. F%^* off.

Spending went up enormously during the Dem Panic/PlanDemic; it's over, doesn't it make sense to reduce spending?

#11 | POSTED BY VISITOR

Funny how this s%*% heap doesn't mention Trump's massive spending ...

Hey rcade, the cultists are approaching pandemic levels of misinformation. I'm ok with you canning their stupid asses for such blatant lying.

Spending went up enormously during the Dem Panic/PlanDemic; it's over, doesn't it make sense to reduce spending?

#11 | POSTED BY VISITOR_

A link would help. Oh, maybe because you're full of s^% ...

This ain't a Trump thing. It's a pro Hamas left thing.

#3 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Odd thing to say.

If it were a Dem POTUS, yall would be either claiming he precipitated it or would be calling it a false flag ...

No please, go FF that because you don't know enough to write a response.

since the clot shot came out.

#16 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

In your ignorance you prove my point.

The "clot shot" were adenovirus based vaccines from AstraZeneca and J&J.

They were both pulled from the market after a safety signal of about 130 cases out of millions of administered doses showed a low risk of clotting disorder in middle aged women.

FFS if for the ease of math, if you say an even 100 out of a million doses, you're at a 0.01% risk rate.

But we're talking about ~130 out of MILLIONS. And it got pulled, even when every vaccine was under an EUA. Thats hardly the picture you paint.

You don't have a clue. You've never had a clue. Just stop and go sit down.

If JPW had his way doctors would still be prescribing Oxycontin for mild pain with a label that says only a 1% addiction rate.

Except that was a blatant, documented lie that wasn't hard to spot based on the drug compound.

The s%^* you cite against Covid vaccines depends on your ignorance to keep traction.

Anyone with a lick of knowledge of virology and immunology laughs at you tools.

That's because if the specific language of the NFA and the recent SCOTUS decisions that have solidified this court's 2A stance.

The NFA and historic bans/laws specifically mention something along the lines of uncommon use or unusual weapons.

That language is explicitly cited by Palmetto State Armory as their rationale for making highly affordable ARs-if they're no longer uncommon or unusual, the vans are, in theory, easily challenged by the letter of the law.

Wait until he shows up in a military uniform.

And the maga idiots fawn over his "strength" while acting like civilian control of the military isn't a thing.

SCOTUS has said multiple times they'll keep certain regulations in place, including certain types/classes of weapons used for (if I remember the phrasing correctly) criminal or unusual purposes.

The argument will, for ARs at least, eventually come down to the fact that they're not uncommon or unusual anymore.

#8 you're slinging unsubstantiated nonsense because you're an idiot with chronic intellectual laziness.

#22 you're not smart enough to make that assessment, gutes deutsch.

CDC follows actual conclusions reached from actual studies.

You're an ignorant blowhard, just STFU and let your betters take care of things.

I find some irony in people blathering on about the inferiority of Russian weapons... as if it makes a difference...

When the claim is that it will upset the power balance between the Koreas ...

It's not blathering. Acting as if Russian equipment isn't third world garbage is the same as acting as if the Noem made an "mistake" when she said habeus corpus is a POTUS constitutional right.

It's just regurgitating a narrative based on outdated information and thinking.

There was plenty of evidence before DOGE now its all out in the open, but you're too blind to see it, I may add.

#10 | POSTED BY ONEIRONAUT

STFU you lying sack of s%^*.

There's nothing "in the open" because DOGE didn't actually do anything you stupid f^*%.

Jesus Christ you're f^*+ing stupid.

And because you're a stupid pile of s^%#, you post garbage from sites like the Washington Examiner that plays games like this

A prime example of a publicly funded private foundation that could raise eyebrows among U.S. taxpayers is the African Agricultural Technology Foundation. The nonprofit organization, which exists to provide technical assistance to African farmers, pays its four directors between $190,097 and $272,302 per year. While this is far from the seven-figure salaries some NGO heads bring in, AATF is based in Kenya where the average income is just over $7,000 annually, meaning that its leaders earn close to 30 times more than the typical Kenyan.

They don't even bother moving the goal posts, the just push them over and toss in some hockey nets.

And you're worthless idiot dumb a%^ slurps it up.

At least you've stopped pretending to be a "liberal." F^*+ing idiot.

you're an uninformed idiot for not know what was going on.

#9 | POSTED BY ONEIRONAUT

No, that's not what money laundering is you stupid f^*#.

Seriously, you've gotta be one of the stupidest yet most smug pieces of s%^# here.