Fun fact. Apollo 10's mission was to fly low over the lunar surface and then ascend to rendezvous with the command module. The LM was intentionally underfueled to ensure the crew wouldn't go for a landing since at their lowest they were only a couple dozen kilometers from the surface and NASA was afraid the competitive and daring nature of the guys flying the missions would make it too tempting. So, the guys on 10 had a choice: mission as planned and go home or deviate, land and stay.

Where do I find them?

-ballwasher, lfthndcuck, fistedp^&&%, oneirondips*&^ et al

Are technical issues slowing things down?
#1 | Posted by LampLighter

I know they recently delayed the launch of Artemis II due to fuel leaks during a test.

Sounds like subcontractors aren't doing a good job of fulfilling their end of the bargain.

It also seems ambitious to go from unmanned launch to manned lunar orbit to lunar landing. I'm surprised they aren't modeling this program off of Apollo where it was very incremental to ensure the next required step of the process could be done successfully before moving on to the next stage. An assumption of proficiency because it succeeded 50+ years ago seems wildly irresponsible.

FTA:

Weeks later, the very judge who authorized the takedown took a second look and reached a different conclusion: the government investigators now asking for trust no longer deserved it.

Earlier this week, U.S. Magistrate Judge William Porter made that judgment explicit, blocking the Justice Department from searching the seized devices of journalist Hannah Natanson and sharply rebuking prosecutors for how they handled the case.

In a blistering 22-page opinion, Porter reversed course after initially authorizing the seizure, ruling that the DOJ, led by Bondi, could not be trusted to police itself in light of its omissions, shifting explanations, and priorities that put hunting down leaks ahead of protecting First Amendment freedoms.

Now, instead of allowing a government "filter team" to review the materials, Porter ordered that the court itself would conduct the examination " a rare and humiliating step that deepened the DOJ's embarrassment and highlighted growing judicial skepticism of its actions.

Imagine that guy's response if a bunch of illegals had kidnapped some white 18 year old girl, dropped her off at a random place and she was found dead a while later...

I don't know about y'all, but I am shocked that lfthndcuck would come here and excuse this!

It's no not him to be a giant bigoted pile of s*&^.

Socialism usually ends up in genocide.

#27 | Posted by boaz

LOL

I was just using this as a trolling headline.

#9 | Posted by boaz

A state is making some people's lives hell, and your response is to troll someone who you think might be one of those?

Tell us again how you're not a s*&^ person...

They maybe need to address the ability to change birth gender first.

#1 | Posted by boaz

There's no such thing as "birth gender."

How can someone be so ignorant of a topic but so overly opinionated?

I also think they want an air of legitimacy.

If they "win" in November, they can claim a mandate and then the truly awful s*&^ can start happening.

I mean, even Putin still forces the narrative of legitimacy even though everyone knows it's a scam.

They won't give it back because they don't have it.

You are a walking, talking joke... you realize that, don't you?
#3 | Posted by Corky

In this case, he's not wrong.

I've read more than a few analyses that the AI firing waves are just AI as an excuse to fire people without cause.

Why else would company after company fire large swaths of workers for systems/tools that nearly every other company that has already implemented them regret implementing them?

President AOC

I'm sorry, but LOL

I'll bet not a single one of the unAmerican s^^%stains that post here will speak out against this.

President Trump is committed to ensuring that Americans have full confidence in the administration of elections

Which means they'll be destroying said confidence.

Poor shrimpd*&^. So beholden to Dear Leader he even needs to babble about duhhhhhh HoAxZ!!!! for a dips*&^ underling like Kash Patel.

No s*&^.

Prove it.

#17 | Posted by boaz

I can't wait to see the mental gymnastics from this pedo protector when it becomes clear he's a pedo protector but can't or won't admit he's a pedo protector.

Who won the election in 2016? According to Hillary?

#17 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Dumbf*&^ dodges the questions.

Then acts like there wasn't two investigations into foreign interference in the election that both found significant foreign action to influence 2016 and 2020, one of which was a GOP senate committee report signed by our current SoS.

Oh, and still has the hutzpah to post this gem

All of this is nothing more than a prelude to Democrat losses - so they can say they got cheated.

#3 | Posted by lfthndthrds

#14 | Posted by lfthndthrds

You're so desperate to not be a moron it's sad.

All of this is nothing more than a prelude to Democrat losses - so they can say they got cheated.

#3 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Are you really so lacking in awareness that you'd say this with a straight face after the last six years of election fraud chirping from you dips*&^s?

No thanks needed, but it's much appreciated.

I really mean it when I tell people my demeanor towards them is a mirror of their demeanor to myself and others.

Further, my background is in science. Infectious diseases by training but have since moved on to other pastures during the pandemic.

DoJ is investigating whether DoJ illegally withheld documents to cover for the Orange Chomo.

Yeah, that's gonna be a trustworthy "investigation."

Actually, red states is where all the blue people are running to get away from their liberal utopias..

#149 | Posted by boaz

LOL you call me an idiot only to completely ignore a well established fact by stating an irrelevant belief (not even a stat) to invoke your safety blanket narrative.

Yes I have a wife and kids.