And my biggest problem with it is that you want to stand on the same stage as real, objective science as if you're equals, meanwhile you and your side always start with a conclusion and contrive evidence to support it. It's the complete opposite of real science.

Like I said, all you really have is ad hominem.

Accurate statement of fact isn't an ad hominem.

More 'smart people believe like me, so I'm smart!' level thinking. Your fav.

Fact of the matter is that ID, Creationism, whatever your pushing in parallel...none of it has actual real, objective evidence. It lives in the uncertainty and unanswered questions scientists have yet to solve, an ever smaller and smaller space to stake a claim on.

I wouldn't be surprised if Hasan visited the Drudge to get talking points, this site keeps me ahead of the BS thats coming.

#29 | Posted by oneironaut

As a "liberal" living in California, I would have thought you'd be in the know without this place.

So just more checkboxes that most of the posters here are just leftist trolls at this point.

#24 | Posted by kwrx25

So because we don't use Twitch or get info from talking heads on YouTube, we're just trolls?

You're not a serious person.

Conveniently, I'm sure they'll say the clock restarts for seeking Congressional approval.

Werks. But LOLz is comment worthy, eh?

Of course, I don't know "exactly" how it works.

Difference is some of us continue to work on it while others simply declare "God did it!"

Which is yet another common Creationist argument - the God of the Gaps.

how some interest group used it is beside the point.

Behe? He's a fellow at The Discover Institute LOL still pushing "Intelligent Design" nonsense.

It's not a whataboutism.

You're literally pushing the same idea, just under a different name.

And it's not an obscure idea as it was central to anti-evolution arguments pushed by The Discovery Institute for years when they tried to force Creationism into schools and biology textbooks.

Michael Behe is a biochemist by training and he wrote an entire book about it called Darwin's Black Box.

You're pushing a concept similar to Michael Beehee's irreducible complexity.

Which is garbage once actual science is introduced.

Putin must be getting desperate or frustrated. It must be even worse than we're being told.

- people who can't form a cogent argument

Post "LOLz!" instead.

#98 | Posted by Corky

Would it be better if I used words like LULz and prolly? Because you do regularly, which is probably why you think the number of degrees is meaningful to a discussion that went as far as "The fact that they found the big bag supports genesis because it says there was a beginning!"

Really hard hitting stuff, cork. Super insightful and persuasive.

Those 3 people have more science and math doctorates than you have toes.

#91 | POSTED BY CORKY

The only people who care are people who can't form a cogent argument but want to feel justified and "intellectual" about religion.

Aaaaaaand less than ten minutes in and they're already saying myths in genesis are "confirmed" by the Big Bang Theory.

LOL I can't believe these people are saying this with a straight face.

Unlike the average politician I do believe that Trump couldn't care less about the polls.

#5 | Posted by MSgt

Because he doesn't care about elections because he has no intentions of letting free and fair elections happen.

I'm watching Corky's youtube video.

Not even 2:30 in and I'm already getting LOLz.

Duhhhh LumPeRz@!!!

STFU idiot.

#6 | Posted by MSgt

Seriously, you are one of the biggest, most stupidest pieces of s*&^ I've ever interacted with.

Believing that...wow. Like holy s*&^ are you f*&^ing stupid.

It's about the dumbest comment I have ever seen. Just because no one in power believes in your ideology doesnt mean we are a "failed states".

That's not why, dumbf*&^. We have already begun two of the four characteristics.

Inability to provide services
Collapsed institutions

We're not far from a third - internal strife/violence

The only characteristic of the four that isn't there yet is loss of control, because this administration is trying to exert the most of any POTUS of my lifetime.

Women are dramatic. Females are dramatic. Gay, flamboyant men are dramatic. So now we know why you are so dramatic. You dont have enough testosterone in your body to calm down.

#14 | Posted by boazreborn

Of course, you're the kind of tool bag dumbf*&^ who would refer to women as females.

Also, of course, all you have is to fall back on your feeble sense of what masculinity means.

Because you're a pathetic little b*&^% who couldn't role model a man if he tried.

Heaven forbid anyone speak out against democrats and republicans colluding.
#4 | Posted by ClownShack

I'm old enough to remember a time, a much, much better time, when that wasn't such a bad thing.

Because Trump brought the prices of eggs back down where Biden had made the price rise.
#46 | Posted by boazreborn

LOL again, this is either a spot on satire account or mooch really is a childish buffoon.

So even though the cases aren't at all related to military matters and the Army has no interests in the case, military lawyers can be used to prosecute civilians in Trump's America.

Brief written by 11 former JAG officers in support of the defendant:

And while the Bible doesn't record Him singling out homosexuality the way some people do today, that doesn't mean He would have approved of the behavior either.

No, but if you're going to cling to your Bronze Age goat herder myths with any level of rigor or good faith, you'll not insert your personal beliefs when ambiguity is present and will limit your statements to what is explicitly stated in the text.

'Hey guys, how come you're not paying super close attention to this guy I just learned about through spoon fed chain email talking points like you are to the guy who is a neo-Nazi white nationalist who was a significant player in the 2020 election denial and January 6 insurrection?!?! Stupid libruls!'

-pedoringer

STFU idiot.

I saw this guy's name mentioned here a few times last week.

Looked him up and learned he's a podcaster who apparently was meh about a few stolen lemons.

And for some reason pedoringer has his panties all wadded over him.

I mean, I'm not surprised he's full of fauxrage over something he's been told to be fauxraged over, that's his MO.

More purity test nonsense.

Yes.

It's not 100% (nothing in science is), but the evidence and biology do not align with that conclusion.