"Is the problem Congress not "fixing" SCOTUS decisions? Can Congress actually do that? imo, that's another discussion thread." Lamplighter.

Yes, it is.

We don't need another court case to fix bad SCOTUS decisions.

Congress is at fault, too. Some of the laws SCOTUS has had to deal with is just badly written law.

No one wants legislation from the bench, yet when it happens, the Legislature should be fixing the law, not another court case to work its way through the Coutts.

Congress or the States can propose Amendments to fix the Constitution or make something Constitutional or not.

SCOTUS makes its own problems with bias. The court should not be obviously ruling based on political leaning. Pick any decade with a 6-3 ruling and the decision was probably bent based on belief and politics.

When the ruling is good or bad based on R and D, ideology not law.

The problem with SCOTUS?

When anyone can guess the results of a supreme court case based on party affiliation of the judges.

When people determine that a 5-4 decision of any case establishes precedence and can't be wrong.

Congress won't fix SCOTUS decisions through legislation or amendments.

Close the 900+ US foreign military bases.

Odds the Federal Court states the Supremacy Clause?

Would the thirteen colonies agree unanimously outlawing slavery in the new country, the United States?

Would the thirteen agree unanimously to no Electoral College?

Would the thirteen agree unanimously to a straight democracy winner-take-all?

Donnerboy, explain how the US does those without the use of force?

The idea that the US shouldn't be an empire?

The War of Independence brought freedom from England. The new country was very expansion minded and didn't like countries not wanting to be isolated. (Japan and the Iron ships)

Freedom of the Press Foundation:
"The United States can't lead the world in defending press freedom on World Press Freedom Day when it's actively dismantling it at home."

Why should the US defend press freedom overseas? It's not the US responsibility.

Isolationism and nationalism and any -ism that keeps the US out of other nations is thoroughly rejected by the media and politicians.

The average joe wants us to leave the world alone.

Trade? Sure, but not alliances. Alliances share enemies.

"The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connection as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements, let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop. Our detached and distant situation invites and enables us to pursue a different course ... "

George Washington's statement is rejected as if the US must be the defender of the world and any nation under rule.

Such as, NDAA

The Fiscal Year 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), signed in December 2025, mandates a minimum of 76,000 U.S. troops in Europe. This provision prevents the administration from reducing troop levels below this threshold for more than 45 days without congressional certification and NATO consultation.

WHY?

Monthly pass for public transportation. Since the city hasn't raised prices, it's the cheapest way to travel.

Of course, my fare paid for all the special class of people to ride free: they ride free and have for decades.

Its already unconstitutional because only men have to register.

The courts have given opinion, but refuse to declare anything. They think Congress should fix unconstitional law first.

The Court should strike it down.

You really are stupid?

IMR doesn't include abortions as the cause of death.
If you don't abort a healthy baby,the IMR is affected. Another healthy baby is born. Are you really unable to understand that infant mortality is affected every time a healthy baby is born.

Infertility would make abortion unnecessary, or are you too stupid to understand that too? Fertility rates are false numbers considering millions of fertile moms killed their offspring

You must be stupid. Killing healthy babies affecting the birth rate of healthy babies.

Based on available data, an estimated 95% or more of abortions in the U.S. are for reasons other than major fetal anomalies or risks to the mother's life. The vast majority of abortions, over 93%, occur within the first 13 weeks of pregnancy.

Mortality rates would go down if people would stop aborting healthy babies.

It's not fertility. It's birth rate.

When millions are aborted yearly, fertility is not the issue.

The Republicans are pushing for the draft because every trans-woman will be sent to the front.

Corporations aren't people. They should not be allowed.

Same with Foundations, Clubs, Guilds, Unions, and any other 'title' acting as 'citizens'

The House of Representatives voted to keep their Slush/Silence Fund of accusers paid off from being released because...

Wait for it...

To protect the victims.

Over 60 people on and connected to the J6 Committee were pardoned.

Accepting a pardon means admission of guilt.

Not one person refused the Biden pardon.

Biden claimed accepting the pardon is not
indicative of committing any crimes yet Biden's DOJ claimed in court filings its admission of guilt if anyone accepted Trump's pardons.

Expect Trump to pardon a lot of people and Vance will pardon Trump if he resigns or us removed.

Alcee Hastings impeached and removed by the Senate.

Elected to the House.

The first President was guilty of high treason,along with many other forefathers.

MMIWG2SLGBTQQIA+ is a Canadian acronym standing for Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women, Girls, Two-Spirit, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Questioning, Intersex, and Asexual+.

Didn't Disney once use, "one and all" to avoid leaving someone out?

Executive Grant of Clemency

President of the United States of America
TO ALL TO WHOM THESE PRESENTS SHALL COME, GREETING:
BE IT KNOWN, THAT THIS DAY, I, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED
STATES, PURSUANT TO MY POWERS UNDER ARTICLE II, SECTION 2, CLAUSE 1, OF THE
CONSTITUTION,

Anyone I damned well please,

For those offenses against the United States which the have committed or may have been committed or taken part in during the period from January 1, 2014 through December 1, 2026, including but not limited to all offenses previously charged or prosecuted

A FULL AND UNCONDITIONAL PARDON
FOR ANY OFFENSES against the United States which they may have committed or taken part in arising from or in any manner related to the activities or subject matter

I have hereunto signed my name and caused the seal of the Department of Justice to be affixed.

Precedent has already been established.

The trial I was on has multiple shots fired. The ones in the body couldn't be identified. The ones that missed were in better condition and ballistics matched up.

It was weird looking at multiple bullets and knowing that the experts agreed, not every bullet could be determined. It was up to the jury to decide if the evidence could be accepted and assumptions made.

And Garland did nothing.

Either the evidence is there and Garland was complicit in a cover up or there isn't enough evidence.

Is Garland guilty of a coverup?
If not, then this isn't new, it's not enough.

If it's plenty, then both parties and involved in the scandal.

So, when is the DC Madam's files being released?

When is the House going to release redacted records of their payoffs and will the House give the DOJ access to unredacted copies?

Third parties would win if people stopped voting for the 200+ year old two-party stranglehold on the people.

The wasted votes are on the two parties. It won't be fixed until these two parties are out of the way.