The lesser evil is evil.

Outlaw the one lever.

Take the party name off the ballot.

Force voters to know who they vote for.

If everyone consistently voted for the less bad option, the country would rapidly become less bad.

#28 | Posted by SpeakSoftly

And that's pathetic.

The husband wastes 2 billion dollars.
The wife wastes 1 billion dollars.

The lover of both these wasteful fools wouldn't waste like either.

SCREW the correct choice! We want the lesser of two evils because our evil is not as evil as yours.

Those two ladies wanting to play in the WNBA should get a chance to tryout.

Many would pay just to watch the tryouts.

All these transphobic idiots need to let these ladies pursue the dream. How dare they ask for 'proof' of their personal choice

0% of judges believe he can run for President again.

Polls may matter to politicians, but Trump is arguably not a politician in the traditional sense.

MY daughter is 19.5 years old. In 1.5 years, she will no longer be allowed to reside in Germany."

Sounds like she has some paperwork to renew in the next eighteen months.

#56 | Posted by snoofy

Why should she get her paperwork done? It shouldn't be necessary.

Why can't she just stay if she's done nothing wrong and just wants to live where she is.

What should be the consequences if she doesn't comply.

This country will collapse because morons like you still say BOTH SIDES when one side is vastly worse on nearly every issue.

#14 | Posted by SpeakSoftly

One party cheats more than the other.
One party creates more debt than the other.
One party commits more crime than the other.
One party is worse than the other.

Both cheat, create debt, commits crime, etc.
One is better at it than the other.
Ignore the one that does all those horrible things because, well, they just don't screw you as much.

Worse on ever issue. But the one they're better at being worse is BAD.

Yup, single lever voters.

"Third party votes are wasted," say both parties.

Third party voters, "Are you one lever voters this stupid?"

See Also: Universal Declaration Of Human Rights, which Republicans wouldn't sign to save their own life.

#40 | Posted by snoofy

At the time of the Declaration's adoption by the General Assembly in 1948, Eleanor Roosevelt said, "In giving our approval to the declaration today, it is of primary importance that we keep clearly in mind the basic character of the document. It is not a treaty; it is not an international agreement. It is not and does not purport to be a statement of law or of legal obligation. It is a declaration of basic principles of human rights and freedoms, to be stamped with the approval of the General Assembly by formal vote of its members, and to serve as a common standard of achievement for all peoples of all nations."

Why the hell isn't it a treaty, a binding agreement, or law?

1948-2026.

Any administration could have made it to permanent.

Why sign off on a worthless, unenforceable document? Symbolic gestures don't prevent atrocities.

Make it a treaty and let's see how many nations sign off on it.

Most likely, it'll be just like the ICC.

Easy to play defense when the US has 80,000 to 100,000 troops in Europe.

WWII ended in 45.

Time to leave Europe.

Congress though we were in Afghanistan long enough.

"NO WONDER the Trump regime has denounced the ICC: Because they are al likely to be charged with crimes against humanity!

#12 | Posted by e1g1 at 2026-09-01 02:26 PM | Reply"

If the US recognized the ICC, every US President since the ICC creation would be subject to crimes against humanity.

There is no statute of limitations.

Are both parties prepared to send Bush, Obama, Trump, and Biden all to the court? Don't forget all the generals and members of Congress.

"In the grand jury report, which remains sealed but was obtained and published by CBS News Miami"

Sealed but yet obtained.

Guess we need another grand jury on the leaking of a sealed grand jury report.

All these administrations discovered there was a misappropriation of minors.

Other than Epstein and Maxwell, no other criminals have been found.

But, damn, you'd think with all the evidence, somebody else was involved.

Two people couldn't have committed all the crimes themselves!

It's like the pimp and hooker were found guilty but nothing else to see here.

US food goods are bad for your health?

Possibly. Banned from entering Europe.

Such as... those with allergies in the US find they can eat and drink those dame products in Europe without a reaction.

This has been goimg on a very long time.

The government stamp of approval isn't helping.

The ICC doesn't go after the UN for all the crimes they commit themselves.

Individuals here and there, but not the nation's and government.

You never prosecute the one paying your salary.

"Why wasn't Saudi Arabia held accountable by BOTH parties considering BOTH held the House, Senate, and WH.

The Republican Party controlled both chambers of the United States Congress and the Executive Branch in 2003.

Clownshack"

AFTER BUSH. AFTER 2003.

Are you that stupid? Both parties have held the WH and Congress since Bush. Both parties have ignored Saudi Arabia and Epstein.

SA got a pass and why only Epstein and Maxwell?

Trump Trump Trump.

There's been other Presidents and Congresses that have allowed it.

But Mr Morell concedes there are parts of the US account the world may never be told. "A hundred per cent of the story that's out there is true - but not a hundred per cent of the story is out there," he admits. June 2015

I would have been fine with NW or SW States. But, you have to earn your chops to get those seats.

It would have been a great opportunity.

You are right it not a job for anyone. The hardest part I found was the screen analysis: Air speed, direction, altitude, weather symbols, and part 2: having to speak very, very clearly.

Thank God I had an insider who Gabe me access to practice samples. I thought the abstract part was hard until I hit the screens.

I always thought it was funny they played video games on breaks as relief for their eyes and mind.

"It's interesting how 9/11 was blamed on Saudis, but we blew up Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria ... and now Iran.
Coming up soon, Turkey."

Why wasn't Saudi Arabia held accountable by BOTH parties considering BOTH held the House, Senate, and WH.

"Trump is doing 9/11 stuff now, to distract from the Epstein Files."

After Epstein and Maxwell, the prosecution couldn't go after anyone once those two were charged.

Any person that knows law: you only get two apples from the tree. After that, nobody else can be charged. Seems the Executive branch, under BOTH parties belief it.

Plenty of controllers to take over the air coverage.

No one could call out sick if the staff couldn't handle the air traffic.

There's more to the story and it ain't the controllers that went home.

The air traffic control test is obviously really hard. I was offered the NE, SE, or Central years ago. I wanted NW or SW as a start. Turned them down, but my buddy in NY said it was a great job.

BS the accident involved solely the two employees going home early.

U.S. intelligence indicating that NATO sees Russia as weakened by the Ukraine war, offering the US and Europe an opportunity to escalate action against Russian interests and allies in the East, according to two people familiar with the matter.

The only reason Epstein and Maxwell had court cases is because everyone knows the court records were sealed and nobody else could be prosecuted.

Even today, the files are still sealed and nobody can be charged.

The records currently in hand were insufficient then as they are insufficient now.

Congress should just go into a sealed room, review all the unredacted Epstein Files themselves, and then release them on the House floor under the Speech and Debate Clause.

Let's see...

Every President that knew that the laws were wrong, the bills are too much, the debt keeps going up, VETOED.

Every Senate took a look at the House's bills and voted against them.

Thanks to the WH and the Senate, deficit spending is in the long ago past.

Surpluses for decades have paid down the National Debt and the People are better for it.

Or, did both parties just sign off on it.

Both parties have approved the National Debt.

Think it'll change in January when the House flips?

Let's see...

Every President that knew that the laws were wrong, the bills are too much, the debt keeps going up, VETOED.

Every Senate took a look at the House's bills and voted against them.

Thanks to the WH and the Senate, deficit spending is in the long ago past.

Surpluses for decades have paid down the National Debt and the People are better for it.

Or, did both parties just sign off on it.

Both parties have approved the National Debt.

Think it'll change in January when the House flips?

Just look up the current state of welfare in the Nordic countries.

It's been deteriorating.

Then look at the reasons it's happening.

Eventually, when a good thing grows, it takes more to give more.

Let's see...

Every President that knew that the laws were wrong, the bills are too much, the debt keeps going up, VETOED.

Every Senate took a look at the House's bills and voted against them.

Thanks to the WH and the Senate, deficit spending is in the long ago past.

Surpluses for decades have paid down the National Debt and the People are better for it.

Or, did both parties just sign off on it.

Both parties have approved the National Debt.

Think it'll change in January when the House flips?