" It's Berenstain"

Yes, but they had a son, so there is a Berenson connection.

Bernstein is even further off the mark than Berenstein.

" They're calling her black because most white folks would cross the street if they saw her approaching from a distance."

What are you basing that on? It seems like you're reimagining her as a stereotypical poor black person, rather than the way she actually looks and dresses.

" Black isn't her nationality. It's her skin color."

Asian isn't a nationality either, smartass. She presents with more Asian-American and European-American traits then African-American ones. By any metric, she's less black than Obama.

" This is America.

Don't overthink it"

I bet you probably think that's a nationality too.

I'm not overthinking it. You're being anti-intellectual.

" That would be Bernstein Bears."

Nope. That's the Mandela Effect playing tricks on you.

I thought Berenson was a family of bears.

"It was hardly a resounding loss."

She received even fewer electoral votes than Clinton did eight years earlier. So yeah, it was a pretty clear, unmistakable defeat.

People who voted for Trump in 2020 or 2024 have to rationalize why they voted for an F-grade candidate over a C or D grade candidate.

"And a black woman"

It's funny how Asians don't even exist on many Americans' radars, at least consciously. Kamala's more Asian than Black. Her first name is literally of Asian origin, while her last name is European.

I had to dig deep down into the article to even figure out what it was on about. A lot of wonkish and procedurial stuff - that probably was a bigger factor in it not being widely covered by the "mainstream media" than some implied conspiracy to try to suppress it.

Is this really a huge win for free speech? Do you think it will actually stop the government or corporations from overreaching and abusing their powers against individuals and smaller businesses?

Ha.