"Awww, run out of butt-paste? Can't handle folks reverting to the truth? Or do you actually believe calling Dems Soyboys adds to the conversation?"

I'm going to be kind and ignore you for the rest of this thread. You can go ahead and claim victory, pretending I ran away for your imagined reasons, if it makes you feel better. The truth is, you've embarrassed yourself here and in the other thread where you went Full Snoofy with your strawmen, and then doubled and tripled down on it. Adios.

"directly"
*directed

"Gawd you're remarkably dense and politically tone deaf sometimes."

You're both taking extreme positions here. The way you talk about the committee suggests you think it's flawless and your knee-jerk reactions to SS's comments indicate you think it's beyond criticism. This article was a bit sappy and over the top in its praise and was clearly directly at people who don't have very analytical minds.

"It's as if you're completely oblivious of just how effective this committee has been"
"It would be sad if it weren't tragic just how ignorant you are of reality"

^^ A perfect of the tone deafness that helped get Trump and the ming-mongs riding on his coattails elected.

"Your viewpoint is YOURS and not shared by a majority of Americans regardless of what you deludedly think."

Sounds like you've deluded yourself into thinking just because a majority of Americans rejected Trump in the last election it means they agree with your own viewpoint. Americans are fickle. A lot the same people who previously voted for Obama voted for Trump in 2016, and then four years later Trump lost by practically the same electoral and state count margins that his opponent did to him in the previous election.

"Who gives AF?"

And here's another example of the trolling tactic Sally4th has been regularly engaging in. He doesn't give AF if someone was talking about something different than what he's monomaniacally focused on. He doesn't want to listen what other people are actually saying.

"Is there a difference between these two things?"

Let's see... if you had to choose between one of those two things happening to you, would you prefer one over the other?

"Keep digging, eventually you'll find a swastika."

Aww, Snoof, you were doing so well in this thread. In fact, I was just about to point out that the others need to check themselves because you've been coming across as more reasonable than them in your responses. But now you've given up and ceded the argument by invoking Snoofwin's Law.

"Forced birth = filling out a form ... said no one with a brain, ever."

You're the only one here who's said that. So...

"I didn't refer to it as so-called; the guy who did is a brainless ------- moron."
#17 | POSTED BY JOE AT 2022-06-28 09:18 PM
"SENTINAL is a willfully ignorant gob stopper."
#19 | POSTED BY RSTYBEACH11 AT 2022-06-29 12:52 AM

This is how you guys talk about someone who says Trump deserves to be held legally accountable for his role in the 1/6 riots. And then you wonder why you can't keep independents on your side.

You guys deserved Trump.

Sentor Dantorum has shown himself to be as big of a sore loser as Trump, with the public tantrum and meltdown he's been having in this thread. This all started when he got triggered by my calling out of partisan stupidity, regardless of party affiliation, in #2.

"Congress was actively evaluating removing the male-only requirement of the draft through the 2016 Commission"

And...? I was asked to provide an example of a currently standing law that met a certain criterion, and I provided it. Maybe someone should ask Senator Dantorum why Congress hasn't acted on it yet.

If/when we actually go to war again, the onus will be on those seeking exemptions to show that they met the criteria for them long before they were called up for the draft. It says this right in the Sss web site. They can deny the exemption, or even if they approve it they can still put your body in "non-combatant" service for at least 2 years.

"Dumbfuqq, thy name is SSentinel."

All you can do is barf ad homs and make weak straw man arguments, because you can't argue in good faith.

" Btw did you know the selective service law was found unconstitutional by a federal judge?"

Did you know that decision was reversed on appeal and Supreme Court declined to review that reversal?

I suspect you do, but just in case you didn't, now you know ...

"You think filling out a form is control over a man's body."

So you're saying you didn't use your body to fill out the form? What are you, a Tomorrow Person?

Of course, you're blatantly trolling here because you know I explained in the earlier post about what filling out that form entails, not just the act of filling out the form itself.

Give me your best Cobra Commander impressions. That makes you all sound so much seriouser than me.

OK, Snoofies.

By continuing to claim I can't name a single law that only applies men's bodies, after I explicitly pointed one out to THREE TIMES, you've shown that you are the one who can't debate based on truth. Idiot.

By saying abortion laws only affect women, you are implicitly saying trans men are women. Idiot.

Okay, this is actually news that could help build a legal case for criminal liability on the part of Trump, if the testimony continues to stand up. Unlike the so-called "fake electors" scheme that people were huffing and puffing about earlier.

"If you aren't a Natuve Amerivan, which Mexicans can lrgitimately claim to be, then whywere you granted citizenship automatically?"

Can anyone make sense of this and translate it into plain English?

"Trans men are women." - Danfroth

"Selective Service is an obvious one..."
#12 | POSTED BY SENTINEL

"So, your answer is still no, you can't name a single law that only applies to men's bodies."

YASG.

"Selective Service is an obvious one."
#12 | POSTED BY SENTINEL AT 2022-06-28 11:17 AM

"IOW, you can't think of a single law"

LOL. Idiot.

"that only controls men's bodies."

And a transphobic idiot at that.

"They're also full of ----"
#11 | POSTED BY TRUTHHURTS

This is why you never succeeded at your dream job.

Selective Service is an obvious one. Even though there isn't a draft right now (there probably will be if WW3 actually happens), every male is required to pledge their body to a potential meatgrinder when they turn 18.