Fastest growing cities...you mean cities with lots of open land and that aren't overcrowded?

I wonder why Blue Cities are overcroweded if no one wants to live there?

And Trump ended it already.

TACO

It was the Texas Sands PAC, not Miriam Adleson.
She is a donor to the PAC.
#61 | Posted by Sycophant at 2026-05-05 01:42 PM | Reply | Flag:
I think he's just playing stupid here, but it looks good on him.

#73 | Posted by lfthndthrds

I think you got fact checked and don't know how to respond.

Especially since you ignore the most important parts.

Miriam Adleson is Talrico's largest donor, and pretending that she won't have his allegiance when the time comes is retarded.
bUh gEnOcIdE!!!

#60 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Hey Pedo,

That was in August ahead of the primaries.

It was the Texas Sands PAC, not Miriam Adleson.

She is a donor to the PAC.

And they donated because they really thought Talarico would be an easier opponent than Crockett.

As of now, it's not even in the top 5 for his highest donors.

Trust in corporate news media is at a historic all time low, Zed.
It's why I stand by my last post.

#77 | Posted by BellRinger

Well it is all owned by Republican Billionaires these days.

And it did totally normalize Trump.

So go figure.

Sooooo...it's not only not going to be privately funded as promised, but it will now cost 2.5x the original price if (big IF) there are no cost overruns?
And I'm betting much of this will go to contracts awarded without bids to shell companies that are mere days old that are associated with companies one Trump spawn or another has a stake in?
$1 billion will buy a ton of tacky decorations and gold spray paint from Home Depot.

#4 | Posted by jpw

It was originally $200 million.

So it's 5X the original price tag now.

And yet...the Sacklers aren't in jail.

Why? Because this is America.

China would have executed them.

Wait a second...

That's not a fully armored, highly secure White House ballroom!

Guess we don't need it after all.

Go ahead and defend Piker, Sycophant. I know his messaging because he's been mainstreamed on the left.

#5 | Posted by BellRinger

He's mainstreamed? Where?

The guy is on Twitch. And that's about it.

And frankly I agree with most of what he says.

Tell us, Pedo, what do you disagree with Piker on? And do make sure to quote him.

Jeff has no idea who Hasan Piker is, what he says, or what he stands for.

MAGA = Pedos

No surprises here

What worries me is this. For decades, America has been making short term decisions and then acting surprised when long term consequences show up.

#62 | Posted by BillJohnson

Like:
Billionaire Tax Cuts
Tariffs and Trade Wars
Cutting Education
Cutting Healthcare
Cutting Infrastructure Spending
Foreign Wars
Turning Allies into Enemies
Deporting our Workforce
Gutting our science and health teams
Tax Incentives to Offshore
Allowing Mergers to stifle competition
Poisoning our Water Supply
Stopping anything but coal and oil energy production
Driving green energy companies to China

Short term decisions screwing us in the long term....AKA Trump's Agenda you voted for 3 times.

Shut up, Bill.

Whataboutism....the only play liberals have anymore.

#52 | Posted by BillJohnson

You can't even defend Trump anymore, Pedo.

Facts don't care about your Pedo feelings.

It's ONLY okay for Republicans to post "46" a President.

Not Democrats.

Just like it's ONLY okay for Republicans to talk about "2nd Amenmdment Solutions" and "Watering the Tree of Liberty".

Not Democrats.

Segregating people by race is so on point for Democrats.

#1 | Posted by BellRinger

Irony.

It's LITERALLY what the Supreme Court is allowing Republicans to do:

Draw districts to separate black voters into minority positions so they have no power.

A sim0le look at Louisiana's district map tells anyone with an ounce of sense that SCOTUS got this right.

#10 | Posted by BellRinger

I guess if you are racist, you must make a lot of sense.

#15 | Posted by Danforth

Literally EVERYTHING OneIronPedo says is the opposite of the facts.

It's god damn amazing.

It's like he looks it up and then says THE OPPOSITE.

#6 | Posted by oneironaut

How is it everything you say is literally the OPPOSITE of the facts?

OPEC was designed for economies built almost entirely around oil production.

Over the last decade, the UAE has heavily diversified its economy.

Staying just doesn't benefit them anymore.

Saudi Arabia is also diversifying but will likely stay a lot longer. Their size allows them to really steer OPEC.

I'm sorry but I can't support someone as scary as that.

She has an Attack Cat. She wants to replace the military with cats!

lfthndthrds,

Clinton gets NAFTA passed
Clinton sees a gain 300,000 new manufacturing jobs
Bush passes tax policy that incentives off shoring
Bush sees a loss of 2.5 million manufacturing jobs

Facts don't care about your feelings.

Poor Whiny Pedo

Apparently this -------- hasn't done any math on the economic disaster caused by NAFTA. You know you've lost the gig when your only response is "bUh iTs nOt aS bAd"

#59 | Posted by lfthndthrds

...like manufacturing jobs INCREASED after NAFTA?

And this has NOTHING TO DO with the Tax and Spend Republicans.

Get Help, Pedo.

" If you're against spending, but silent on tax giveaways"
If you support tax increases but are silent on spending you don't deserve a seat at the adult table.

#51 | Posted by BellRinger

Obama and Biden BOTH cut discretionary spending.

Your turn.