Standing, also known as locus standi, is the right of a party to bring a lawsuit in court. It's a condition that a party must meet before the court will consider the merits of their case.

To have standing, a party must:

Have a sufficient connection to the law or action being challenged

Have suffered or be threatened with harm from the law or action

Show that the harm is redressable, meaning a favorable court decision will likely make it better

MOHELA (the missiouri agency that was managing the student loan program) was the party in the student load forgiveness case.

MOHELA did not agree to be party to the lawsuit

MOHELA would have MADE money from the loan forgiveness.

Funny how not one of the 'insurrectionists' were ever charged with insurrection., but go ahead ane perpetrate the lie, as that is what dems are good for, and guess what: The American electorate no longer 'buys' libbies' lies or harris would be the president elect right now.

#11 | Posted by MSgt

I honestly can't wait for you to get everything you voted for. Aren't you as eager?

Oh and the "major questions doctrine" is made up BS that runs counter to the constitution plain and simple.

the courts do not have a role in policing Congress' delegation authority unless someone is injured by said delegation.

christ this is all first day of law school ----.

2. No congressional approval exists for Biden to buy votes buy transferring student loan debt to the taxpayers.

Apples and oranges? More like apples and pumpkins?

#159 | Posted by BellRinger

This is a lie pure and simple.

There are laws passed by Congress

the President INTERPRETS the laws so he can implement them.

If the president incorrectly interprets the law, there are 2 constitutional actions to address the incorrect interpretation

Congress can pass a law clarifying the law

A party injured by the president's action can sue for compensation for their injury.

Again, if the president takes an action that does not injure someone that is not against the law. no injury no role for the court.

Republican AGs used MOHELA as the claimant. MOHELA did not agree to be part of the lawsuit. And in fact MOHELA was going to MAKE MONEY on student loan forgiveness.

Thus the AGs did not show the most basic requirement for a lawsuit-standing.

They did not have standing to sue, because there was no injury. There was nothing for the courts to comment on.

When the courts comment on something that is NOT AN INJURY they are legislating-by definition. They are taking it upon themselves to say this is what the president is required to do or not do. That is Congress' role full stop.

I will say it is tiring, frustrating and annoying to have to repeat the same basic facts to people too dishonest to debate the facts

It's too late jeff to pretend you honestly answered the question when I gave you the answer.

Did you not cheer congressional bypass for Biden to try and buy votes via transferring student loan debt to the taxpayers?

This is a lie. Biden had the authority and at a MINIMUM had the authority to interpret the laws as he saw fit=that is his role as president.

The SC exceeded it's authority by taking the case-no injury means no standing means NO ROLE FOR THE COURTS. Let me repeat, MOHELA was not injured (They would MAKE money on loan forgiveness). NO INJURY NO STANDING. NO STANDING NO ROLE FOR THE COURT. The SC acted as a legislature-this is irrefutable. IF CONGRESS didnt agree with Biden, they could have passed a law to stop him.

This is simple, basic civics which you constantly fail to recognize.

pushed to add statehood, to Puerto Rico and DC.(I support this-the whole taxation without representation thing) Pack SCOTUS with 4 new justices ALL chosen by Biden (I am fine with that given the stolen justice seat and the out of control and CORRUPT SC and it makes logical sense given the size of the country and the number of Federal court districts) and confirmed with a VP tie-breaker. Nationalize voting laws (I support protecting elections and am open to reasonable compromise=including IDs, as long as the federal government ASSURES everyone has an ID at no cost-pubes won't go for that though) and outlawing certain popular safe-guards at the state level like showing ID.

You know what jeff, I would have a scintilla of respect for you if you even said, shoot that does look like senate republicans giving up a core power to -------..

But you won't

Cause you are a ----.

That quote is from John Thune the Senate Majority leader if you weren't aware.

Are you going to man up and admit you are wrong about the senate ceding power to -------?

Third time I ask the question

Nothing sociopathic about that question. You brag about admitting mistakes.

"We must act quickly and decisively to get the president's nominees in place as soon as possible, & all options are on the table to make that happen, including recess appointments. We cannot let Schumer and Senate Dems block the will of the American people."

You said republican senators are not ceding power to -------.

Won't answer the question too.

Point and laugh at the magat -----

That is all.

You're flailing around filled with impotence and rage and are asking questions' along the lines of, "Are you still beating your wife."

FFS. Grow the eff up. Cope. Channel your hyper-emoti9ns toward something positive.

#143 | Posted by BellRinger

I find it quite positive to point out that magat scum are defending a------------

I am honestly curious why you DON'T condemn a------------.

Odd I think.

BTW are you still raping children?

Point and laugh at the magat -----

That is all.

before you go, are you going to man up and admit you are wrong about the senate ceding power to -------?

You always admit when you are wrong, right magat scum?

And now I am being critized for wishing magat scum get what they voted for

There is simply NO PLEASING some magat scum.

Should a low-income person who voted for ------- not WANT to be a "net loser" under -------'s economic policies?

Should any many who voted for ------- not WANT to be wandering around a hospital begging for someone, anyone to help their loved one?

This is what they voted for, after all.

You magat scum are confusing.

Should a latino who voted for ------- not WANT his family and friends deported?

Should a woman who voted for ------- not WANT to be denied basic reproductive care?

Seriously, you magat scum are very difficult to read

Twoothy,

Since Harris has lost you have wished absolutely horrible things to happen to the loved ones of the people who didn't vote the way you demand they vote.

You are NOT the good guy'.

#136 | Posted by BellRinger a

Jeff, my dear turd/

I have only wished those people to get exactly what they voted for.

Why do YOU think that is "absolutely horrible things"?

I see my simple question cause the DR's resident trash person to run away.

------- magat scum are SOOOOOOOOOO predictable

Republicans-the party of rape and----------.

I nailed you didn't I magat scum?

How was she? Or was it a he? or a they? I'm not judging.

Well, I am, but not over gender.

Funny thing, I do sense a certain sensitivity to the topic in you, magat scum. I hit close to the mark didn't I. Did you pick up a teen hooker not too long ago?

I'm saying that accusations are projections. You likely did some ---- like that if you're accusing others of it. you can keep accusing others but you own that ----, lewzer..

#130 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Wrong

You defended a------------.

I did not defend a------------.

You defended a------------, I suspect, because you have done something similar.

I condemn child rapists, cause that is what a normal person does-kind of a low bar too, which you couldnt get over, magat scum

You know, I look back on my life and I can take great pride in the knowledge that I have NEVER defended a------------.

Did you use it to do that to your child?

#126 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Are y ou using the "I know you are but what am I defense?" You------------ defender magat scum?

Of ---- off you lying piece of ----.

HEY, wait, before you go, are you going to man up and admit you are wrong about the senate ceding power to ----ler?