@#129 ... The burden is ultimately on women to not make themselves accessible. ...

For 10s of thousands of years theists have been using this "theory" to blame women for all the troubles in the world.

Bill clearly doesn't understand how biology works if he thinks there would be a 3rd kid in his solution.

That alone says a lot.

Truth,
"Destroy women's lives and soon gay people's lives."
The real issue is how little respect liberals actually have for women and how little respect some women have for themselves.
They dress abortion up as "empowerment", but there's nothing empowering about ending a life that depends on you.
That isn't compassion. It's convenience.
If women truly respected themselves, they'd respect the power that comes with creating life and not treat abortion as an easy fix for bad choices.

#126 | Posted by BillJohnson

wow

the unalloyed arrogance of this post is something to behold

Do you know women? a woman? Have you ever bothered to actually get to know a woman?

The hate you hold for women is quite breathtaking. There is no other way to interpret that post.

FWIW bill, abortion is a matter of life and death for women.

At some point you should try getting your mind around the fact that it is none of your business.

You're a theist so that will be hard for you

Point and laugh at the magat scum

Gay marriage threatened-approximately 20 million gay people in America

If Christians really started using the Bible to create law, it would be a mess.

#103 | Posted by BillJohnson

LOLOLOLOLOL

I just can't

If Christians really started using the Bible to live by, it would be a mess.

HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
------- theists

Snoofy,
"So is opposition to gay marriage and abortion."
I support gay marriage. I would have preferred something without the word marriage in it. But, it's here and so I support it.
Also, I disagreed outright with overturning Rowe v Wade...I guess they didn't ask for my opinion.

#104 | Posted by BillJohnson a

So, let's consider the score card so far

RvW gone-there are 196 million women in America
Gay marriage threatened-approximately million gay people in America

Trans people-approximately 2.8 million trans people in America
Trans women-approximately 700,000

So, for a very very very small fraction of incidents (trans women in women's lockerrooms(?) cause bathrooms have stalls, so that is not an issue) to destroy women's lives and soon gay people's lives

Penis/no penis.
Doesn't matter what you believe you are. Stay out of women's areas if you have one.
Problem solved.

#112 | Posted by BillJohnson a

Why?

Seriously. that is the nub of the matter, why?

You can choose to just ignore that, but your stated reason is not sufficient.

I fully intended on wanting to prevent transgender "rights" in women's private space where they undress.
That's where things were headed politically and socially.
It's still being fought, but it's a lost cause for liberals now, thankfully.

#106 | Posted by BillJohnson a

Setting aside the destruction caused to enable this niche issue, what exactly is your concern about transgender people in women's spaces?

Democrats don't care about the suffering, they are on a quest to provide free health insurance for illegals.

#9 | Posted by visitor

Republican's healthcare plan is to piss on starving sick children.

Shut the government down until Trump is impeached and removed from office

Rsty,
Anytime I feel like being insulted and read personal attacks on my value and worth as a human being, just post on this site.
Always someone to oblige.

#86 | Posted by BillJohnson

Something happening so regularly may also say something about you.

truth hurts

Spending 300 million on a ballroom after demolishing the east wing"
Is Trump spending tax-payer money?
Are you trying to dictate how the wealthy should use their money?
Personally, I think it's appalling that some people are multi-billionaires in the first place but I'm not about to put any emotional energy into worrying about how they spend it.
#130 | Posted by BillJohnson a

You are too stupid, immoral and unethical to understand the magnitude of the problem of "private funding" for WH construction.

I don't have the energy to deal with mega stupid

Can someone explain to bill that is not how democracy works?

I'm a borderline Hall of Fame troll, Alexandrite. I easily elicit multiple responses with a single post. And it doesn't take any effort.
#27 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-04-06 05:42 PM

Reminder that the right wing propagandists didn't sign on due to some sort of patriotism or mutual support of other press but to avoid being the subject of lawsuits moving forward if they happen to print something that pisses off the regime.

".. Donald Trump won the 2024 election because of inflation. The issue was the most important to voters' choices in 2024, according to a Gallup poll. ..."

See, this is where you are wrong.

Trump won because the American electorate morally bankrupt.

Further evidence of this is that the American electorate no longer holds it's politicians accountable for prices.

When are the talking heads going to get that fact into their thick skulls?

I want to point out something I missed the first time around

CNN report from 2010: $376 million White House renovation during the Obama Administration. Where was the Democrat outrage then? Also that was paid for by the taxpayers.

#72 | Posted by MSgt at 2

AND

"...was funded by a congressional appropriation approved in 2008 under the George W. Bush administration."

Typical magat scum reaction whatabout that Obama did something when it was actually his predecessor

MSGT serious question can you read at a 5th grade level?

First

The 2010 White House renovation was a four-year, multi-million dollar infrastructure project to replace outdated and failing systems, primarily in the East and West Wings. The project, which was named the "White House Big Dig" by the press, involved excavating underground to upgrade electrical wiring, plumbing, and HVAC systems, and was funded by a congressional appropriation approved in 2008 under the George W. Bush administration.

How is that in any way comparable to what Trump is doing?

I ask without hope of getting a reply.

Second

Your observation about the Rose Garden is that Trump previously desecrated that space.

Again, the Rose Garden was the brain child of a beloved First Lady who was the wife of an assassinated president.

As such the Rose Garden holds special meaning to Americans or at least those who cherish their nation's history.

NO ONE is saying Trump and Melania cannot have an impact, even a permanent impact on the house. That is absolutely appropriate EVEN IF ------- IS A DICTATOR

We are saying that what ------- does should be respectful of the history of the White House. There are MANY ways he could have changed the White House and it's surroundings WITHOUT DESTROYING a third of it and then tripling the size of the building with a tacky pointless ballroom.

But, then again, you are too stupid to understand.

Ok, so the next dem president can just demolish the trump ballroom easy peasy

They also thought Congress would guard its power vociferously

They were bigly wrong there too

And giving Air Force 1

This is insane

This is not how a government should function.

Paying the military
Constructing public buildings

We are deep in banana territory

Adding tacky ------- gold painted ornaments to the oval office is disgusting but you won't hear me commenting on it as it is well within norms.

Paving over the garden planted by a beloved First Lady of an assassinated president is pissing on our history.

Some people ------- care about that ----. IT IS WHO WE ------- ARE. The White House is known as the People's House. Every president until this one has respected the relationship between his occupancy and the structure. Yes, changes can happen, but they should ONLY happen after careful consideration over the history and traditions that define us. A president is a temporary occupant of a building that belongs to ALL OF US. Trump is the first one to act like it is his house

Tearing down a wing of the WH to build a pointless ballroom is a breathtaking display of disrespect for our country

All because one single person wanted it.

He doesn't care about the countless Americans who hold that building precious as a secular symbol of the greatness of the promise of America.

He simply does not care about our history, ANYTHING that came before him means nothing to him.

It represents in a real tangible way how little he cares about what America is all about.

Bill uses artificial intelligence to express his natural stupidity

Anyone who argues past changes to the white house are in any way comparable to tripling the size of the white house is a disgusting vile, despicable liar.

Full ------- stop.

The White House is one the primary symbols of America and it's heritage.

No single person should just ------- change that, full ------- stop.

Anyone who argues differently is beneath contempt.

Trump is building a tacky, unnecessary eyesore that will serve zero purpose other than inflating his ------- ego. how many ------- balls does the white house have?

it is disgusting

it is pissing on our shared heritage

It is like smearing ---- on the walls of congress

Oh yeah, magat scum did that too