That song was performed on the Lawrence Welk Show.

Hilarious.

This dude's claim to fame is being a human throw pillow on the Foxy Friends' weekend show and also going on bro-casts to whine about "woke" stuff. He isn't remotely qualified to run a nearly $900 billion federal department. Someone in here seriously mentioned that Hegseth was a high school valedictorian. LOL. Good God. He did attend an Ivy League college - and now he says an Ivy League education is garbage. I'd say this nomination is unbelievable, but with Trump it's actually predictable.

Will these briefings be held in the Mar-A-Lardo crapper?

I don't think there is any other way to say it. Donald Trump is the face of a majority of the American electorate now. His appeals to anger, fear, and resentment carried the day.

#1

Agolf Twittler
Hair Furor
Mango Mussolini
Orange Julius (Caesar)
Fatboy Dim

His facepaint has been particularly sloppy recently, too.

Did he deliberately leave a Hitler-style-moustache shaped white spot above his upper lip, yesterday?

You built that, MAGAts.

The fact that Joke Rogaine's hype man said some despicable things and MAGAts all laughed in unison is not surprising at all. The fact that it is finally getting some attention is a bit surprising. Better late than never, I suppose.

#13

Visiturd's ignorance makes us all very sad:

Reparations are Marxist and un-American! Except when they aren't.

The Civil Liberties Act of 1988 granted reparations to Japanese Americans who had been interned by the U.S. government during World War II. The Act's purpose was to discourage the occurrence of similar injustices and violations of civil liberties in the future. The majority of Democrats in Congress supported the legislation. The majority of Republicans voted against it. The Act was signed into law by 'radical left-wing extremist', President Ronald Reagan. Each surviving internee received $20,000 in compensation (approximately $45,000 in today's money). The Act stated that government actions had been based on "race prejudice, war hysteria, and a failure of political leadership" as opposed to legitimate security reasons. A total of 82,219 individuals received these reparation payments.

Trump policies for his next term:

Finish a Wall that he barely started and that Mexico will never fund.
Impose tariffs (that he doesn't understand) at some arbitrary rate that he pulled out of his butt.
Establish a completely undefined and presumably unconstitutional "Deportation Force."
Revoke ABC's license.
Jail Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff.
Pardon himself and the J6 "Choir".
Cut taxes for himself.
Funnel government contracts to Elon Musk and himself.
Fire career professionals and replace them with lackeys.
Whine incessantly.

"He's disgruntled!"

--Cult 45

#50

Dummy, when "the cops" ask her if she wants her dad to be prosecuted and she says "no" will that be enough to satisfy moronic internet edgelords such as yourself? Of course not.
You know better than she does. You hate her dad. She doesn't. Get over yourself.

Left Hand Turds,

You think Ashley Biden is a minor?

Idiot.

Left Hand Turds,

Ashley Biden doesn't want her father investigated. The fact that losers like you do is completely irrelevant.

Poor Ashley Biden can't get a single democrat to listen to her, but this clown comes out 31 years after a supposed grope and we get dancing bananas.

You do realize this stunt says more about the desperation of the DNC and Harris & Co. than anything else, right? Thankfully this is going to hurt her more than it helps.

#28 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2024-10-24 11:37 AM | Reply

This Ashley Biden? No Democrats listened to her DNC speech?

The Donald has made it very clear that "he would if he could" with his own daughter (the one he obviously thinks is hot, anyway) numerous times.
That's some Bible salesman you got there, GOPiggies. You should be very proud.

Wow, another game changer! Amazing that she suddenly only remembers this less than 2 weeks before the election. You Dems are just total morons for continuing to throw this garbage out. Maybe you should have given more thought to having a better candidate than spending all you efforts making crap up about your opponent.

#13 | Posted by fishpaw at 2024-10-24 11:01 AM | Reply | Flag:

So says the party that give us the $1,000,000 Musk Sweepstakes!

Kamala said her spirit animal is the duck billed platitude.

#11 | Posted by visitor_ at 2024-10-24 10:57 AM | Reply

Visiturd, we all know you want Daddy Trump to spank you like the "bad girl" you are. Tucker can watch.

And this will be something else for the Trumpcult to completely ignore.
Everyone else is lying. The Orange Messiah speaks only truth.

#12

You can vote for anyone you want.
Roadkill Bob is an option, as is Kremlin Jill.
Or you can write in Jesus.

I'm not under estimating her. I'm fully expecting her to continue to fail upwards and win this election.

#9 | Posted by kwrx25 at 2024-10-22 10:30 AM | Reply | Flag:

Speaking of 'failing upward':

I assume you are aware Trump is a trust fund baby who inherited $413 million from his daddy, who managed to lose it, and whose career was in the tank until a TV network created a gameshow that (somehow) convinced morons he is some sort of "Captain of Industry."

I read this article yesterday. It's at best a backhanded compliment. NR doesn't quite say they agree that KH is "stupid" but they don't say she isn't either. NR portrays her as a skilled manipulator and self-promoter who has a knack for getting powerful people on her side. They don't claim she "slept her way to the top," but I think it is implied.

I think that is all b.s. That's actually a more accurate description of Trump.

Three silicon valley billionaires (Musk, Thiel, and Sacks) who have their grubby little paws all over this election all were born in apartheid South Africa - before Nelson Mandela got out of prison and "screwed up the place" for the white minority.
They want the same kind of stratified society here - with those born to rule at the top - and the rest of us plebes down below.

She could win over a lot of voters if she would unambiguously state what, if any, restrictions she supports. But she won't. She won't clearly state her views on any policy issue, especially this one.

#107 | Posted by visitor_ at 2024-10-21 10:21 AM | Reply |

It's too late now, dummy. It's a "state's rights" issue thanks to the neo-confederate weirdos Trump and W. put on the court.