Truth,

"Why is the reaction to a possible discussion about bathroom etiquette resulting in trans people losing healthcare rights?"

I don't see any connection between toilets and healthcare.

Concerning trans healthcare, I think minors are a big topic and rightfully so. Minors can't make that decision and adults shouldn't make it for them.

As for adults, this looks to me more like plastic surgery which is generally not covered unless it's life threatening.

Using the argument, "I'm going to kill myself if I don't get it" should be treated as a mental health crisis and be addressed through psychiatric care.

We could play this all night and I don't feel like it again.

Just the same old rhetoric. Nothing new.

Dan,

"Like equality"

You don't care how women feel about it?

The public had mostly not thought about transgender "rights" but they have since been illuminated to the subject.

I don't see how you can say the word "equality" with a straight face with all the problems trying to accommodate them.

Dress how you want if its appropriate for the setting, but stop trying to say you have actually become the other sex and expecting society to participate in the fantasy.

This is making democrats look like lunatics.

Dan,

"You turned against Democrats the day gay marriage became legal."

Two of the upcoming three seats in the Supreme Court coming open, the next president would be able to nominate their own selection. Two had been nominated by Reagan so they would be replaced with judges nominated by Hillary.

If the current court passed Gay Marriage, replacing those seats with judges nominated by Hillary, would make the court more liberal.

The Supreme Court could more easily pass whatever liberals wanted such as a transgender case.

You can say passing Gay Marriage had something to do with my voting for Trump, but it wasn't that I took issue with Gay Marriage.

Turning against Democrats happened more slowly and wasn't a single event but voting for Trump was more tied to wanting to see a republican fill the upcoming 3 seats.

Hugh,

"A few people are concentrating more and more wealth in their greedy hands"

I agree that concentration of wealth is a travesty and setting the stage for a serious major revolt in the future.

However....that's because of the Supreme Court?

Doc,

Before you point out the obvious, yes I know, transgenders have been around for ages too and have blended in using the restroom that more fits their appearance.

But it all changed when it became political. I never heard anyone complaining during my lifetime about this. But now it's become a major topic discussion as liberals wanted it.

When all this blew up in the media, I posted that transgenders will rue the day liberals turned their quite, private world into a media circus.

Now laws will need passed to shut up the kooks.

Doc,

"Do you mean, as you'd wished/preferred?"

No. This has nothing to do with what I wish or prefer.

It's about maintaining a basic social contract that's existed for ages in civilized societies until modern liberals decided they were smarter than everyone who came before them.

Men use men's restrooms.

Women use women's restrooms.

Private spaces are respected.

That worked just fine until kooks decided normal boundaries were "oppressive" and started demanding everyone else play along with their latest demonstration of being nuts.

When I said "evolved," I meant not blowing up a stable norm to satisfy fringe activist fantasies.

Pretending that basic separation of private space is some kind of moral failure is liberal nonsense.

E1,

"His hand-picked justices were chosen to rubber-stamp anything Trump wanted."

Spare me. Hillary Clinton would have done exactly the same thing, just in the opposite ideological direction. That's how Supreme Court nominations work, whether people admit it or not.

The difference is the downstream impact of a Hillary win. Under a Democratic presidency, cultural policy would not have evolved naturally. Instead it would have been imposed through social and corporate pressure, as had already begun.

Women would have been expected to silently accept biological males in women's bathrooms and women's sports, regardless of fairness or safety. Decades of progress for female athletes would have been sacrificed in the name of a peculiar ideological compliance.

On that issue alone, Trump served as a necessary obstacle to liberal insanity.

He doesn't seem to be aware that 90% of South America identifies as Christian.

His opinions on Christian Nationalism is overlooking that.

Is he implying Christianity is a white religion and Christians are racist?

And the cost of RAM.

Red,

"Christians are generally unaware that Muslim also read the Bible and can often quote from it.
It's mandatory for their faith."

Which hole did you pull that out of?

Laura,

A Chromebook is a real PC, but it's inflexible by design. The hardware is real, but the operating system is intentionally limited. Chrome is mandatory.

You can't switch system browsers.

Think of it as a browser first, with PC hardware built around it.

Not my first choice for a laptop.

I left off my last laptop was Lenovo. Been great.

I buy used laptops almost exclusively, but only from sellers who offer a 30"90 day warranty and accept returns. If a seller says "no returns," I walk away.

Once I get it, I use it heavily during the return window. I run Windows Memory Diagnostic (built into Windows " just type Windows Memory Diagnostic in the Start menu) to test the RAM, and CrystalDiskInfo (free download from crystalmark.info) to check the health of the SSD. Better to find problems early.

Always get an SSD, not an HDD. SSDs are dramatically faster, have no moving parts, are more reliable in laptops, and make the system feel instantly responsive instead of sluggish.

Prefer at least a 1TB drive if possible, and 16GB of RAM is the practical minimum these days.

Hiw long will it take before it becomes clear he's over his head?

Anyone taking bets?

Must have one parent who is here legally, according to Trump.

That would prevent people from exploiting the birthright law.

Snoofy,

"Immigratnts who have been vetted and thus here legally enjoy those rights."

No "thus".

They are not "thus" here legally.

Either your English is confused or your logic is.

I bet you sucked in math too.

I'm done.

Snoofy,

You said,

They get Second Amendment rights after they get vetted

No...being vetted doesn't give you 2nd Amendment rights.

I then cited a couple of cases, the latest 2025, confirming that.

You back peddled and added "after they're legal"

Nuf of this...

Snoofy,

"Name anything anyone has ever corrected you on here, that wasn't accurate."

You a couple days ago and then you back peddled.

Did you wipe your boots like I said where you stepped in it?

Not in the mood for --- for tat with you just pointless back and forth.

Db,

My posts are oftentimes a combined effort with my wife.

She's great at finding information.

Db,

My wife's Master is in History. Research is her middle name. She loves the internet and her tablet.

Db,

"Bill, you're on here all the freaking time talking about the law."

That's not possible but I don't know much about law.

I have to look stuff up and I know that's not something I do a great deal.

Alex,

I research. If I post something incorrect tell me and we'll pursue it.

I like being corrected if it's actually accurate and not liberal propaganda being spread by people don't bother to verify it (that seems to be the case a lot on this site)

Db,

"I didn't call you out for having to research something, obviously. I value research. Good for you."

You said,
Bill Johnson, constitutional scholar, although no one in his well-read household knew what stare decisis is.

In my world that is intellectual snobbery.

Thinking yourself better because you know stuff.

My wife is well-read. I never said that about myself.

We're not interested in law. I hated Business Law in college. Dry and boring.

Db,

"Buddy, I've been reading theological and university press manuscripts and books for the last 30 years."

Are you an intellectual snob?

You called me out for having to research something.

It's not very impressive using your knowledge to insult people.

Clearly the tenet of humility flew right past you.

You might be an interesting person to me if you had a less abrasive personality.

Db,

It's called research.