One person's terrorist is another person's freedom fighter.
I don't believe killing innocent people is justified.

One person's innocent civilian is another person's known collaborator.
Odeh's specialty was counter intelligence. He hunted, killed and tortured Palestinians suspected of working with Israelis. He's probably responsible for more Palestinian deaths than any single member of the IDF.

For what it's worth, I suspect not much to you, the death toll of this attack varies among the different reports. It might have been as low as 3 and as much as seven, 15-20 injuries. For the sake of argument, because Im curious, let's take the lowball number. If Odeh his wife and son were the only deaths would this strike be "justified"?

The term Human Shields was created to justify their killing
The term "Human Shields" was first used in 1880. Back then so-called "Palestinians" were still living in Syria and Egypt.
Unlike the direct (and successful) targeting of military commanders, it's a war crime.

"Civilian" deaths, to the extent someone who willingly aids and cohabitats with a know terrorist is a civilian, would end the instant Hamas decides to crawl from under their rocks and meet the IDF in open battle. We both know which side is unwilling and afraid of that prospect, but only one of us is willing to admit it.

In case anyone is wondering what C0anus intentionally left out - posting a blurb from a known Hamas mouthpiece - Mohammed Odeh, the newly appointed military commander of Hamas's Al-Qassam Brigades was killed along with his wife and son in the attack.
The IDF seems to have hit exactly who it was targeting: a terrorist hiding behind his wife's naqib.

stole the fake scripture
full of plagiarists and idea stealers

Unsurprising take from two uncreative louts whose moral compass in more like a rigged game of spin the bottle - It always seems to point in the direction they wanted to go in the first place.

To steal from Oscar Wilde: plagiarism is the appreciation of the privileged man.
In art, much like science, we all build on the work that came before us.

As for Hegseth, in his attempt to turn a four-petaled tulip into a five-petaled one, notice how he edited out "in the name of charity and good will". No doubt he had to look those words up in a dictionary before deciding to strike them out.