__________
Another week, another study, used by "socialists" trying to re-establish long-debunked correlation of "average" life longevity to the [lack of] "free and universal / single-payer" and, obviously, the "socialism."
As usual, trying to pick and choose small samples of disparate facts to establish "correlation," let alone causation, fails even slightly more rigorous tests, and usually serves only people trying to convince themselves (time and again, with every new "study") that what they've been told "forever" and sincerely believe is true... or just used to influence younger audience, not well versed in statistics and fallacies.
This study itself immediately debunks the thesis of such "correlation" because there is big difference in longevity between the states, yet obviously, no difference between the "healthcare system" in Massachusetts's, Hawaii, Mississippi, Alabama and other states, since it's the same. So the differences or correlations are in many other variables; e.g., a lot closer to levels of education, wealth and income, diet, demographics and genetics (age, race, etc.), crime and suicides etc., and has nothing to do with the "healthcare system."
en.wikipedia.org - States ranked by median household/per capita income
Much better correlation to average lifespan in states?!
If "universal / single-payer healthcare system" were really cheaper, "true blue" states would jump on it... but apparently it's not the case, since Bernie Sanders' VT, CO and CA couldn't afford it, and there is no objective evidence that it's better anywhere else, e.g., in UK, just because some people in some of "new socialism" countries supposedly "like" their "no bills" system for which they "invisibly" pay in much higher income and sales / GST taxes.
TANSTAAFL!
en.wikipedia.org - Vermont health care reform
www.latimes.com - Single-payer healthcare meets its fate again in the face of California's massive budget deficit - LAT, 2024-05-16
www.vox.com - Colorado single-payer initiative failure - 2017-09-14
www.pacificresearch.org - What's Wrong With Single-Payer? Ask Vermont. - 2025-07-02
|------- Everywhere it's tried, universal health care leads to higher costs for taxpayers.
... Colorado can learn from Vermont - and from its own experience. In 2016, nearly 80% of Colorado voters rejected an amendment to establish universal health coverage through "ColoradoCare." To fund the program ... "state would have had to raise taxes, cut services, raise copayments, lower health care provider payments, or some combination of all to cover the difference." -------|
|-------... cost of [Colorado] Amendment 69 was estimated at $36 billion per year, more than the entire state budget. ... "An insurance card doesn't necessarily guarantee you access either" -------|
"Socialism" for many has bizarrely become a shorthand for fuzzy whatever is "not capitalism"... just as "America First" is a slogan / shorthand for fuzzy whatever MAGA's grand poohbah says is "not woke"... or "6-7!" ?
Or just like Trump who, once convinced of something, keeps repeating it despite the facts showing exactly the opposite.
No worries, another study will come along soon, for same people to mangle selective statistics to "prove" whatever they believe.
__________
__________
Klein: 'The White House is the Crisis'
Ezra Klein: The Trump administration is overwhelmed -- by its own violence, its own cruelty, its own lies, its own chaos. There is nothing unusual about a presidency being overwhelmed by crises. What is unusual about the Trump administration is that it has created those crises itself.
Not that unusual for administrations to inadvertently create crises, usually by saying something stupid off the cuff or trying to cover up minor things - Biden's and Obama's had plenty of own goals...
The 2015 movie Our Brand is Crisis was based on the 1993 book "The War Room" about Bill Clinton's campaign, and self-created crises permeated through his presidency.
What is really unusual now is that the crises are usually attempted to be avoided; with Trump it's the opposite - crises and chaos are organic, they're a feature, not a bug.
Doesn't hurt that "crises" justify the permanent "emergency powers" for tariffs, militarization of law enforcement, etc.
Trump is cosplaying President (again, same way he was cosplaying "successful real estate tycoon" on Apprentice just as his real estate and casinos "empire" was crashing down) and needs to constantly deliberately create crises in order to 1) "solve" them and take credit and brag about "solving" them, and 2) distract from previously self-created and real "unsolved" crises, hoping that people will forget about them and "move on" (en.wikipedia.org).
He's never been sufficiently punished or paid real price for all his scams and misdeeds, avoided accountability and was given benefit of the doubt too many times by too many people, escaping personal bankruptcies and prison, hiding behind frivolous lawsuits and NDAs - so, as his superiority complex and dementia grew, he now believes he is a genius and cranks up crisis level to 11, because he wants to be "consequential" and is trying to outdo whatever he thinks previous Presidents couldn't accomplish... obviously, caring not a wit about actual consequences or anything but himself - apre moi le deluge style.
"The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
"Genius is knowing when to stop."
__________