Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News

Drudge Retort

User Info

cutiepie

Subscribe to cutiepie's blog Subscribe

Menu

Special Features

Comments

__________
#3 | Posted by censored at 2025-08-15 11:27 PM
Trump putting on a show that he's not Putin's Beach.

He's been keeping keyfabe of "successful businessman" and "strong leader" for a very long time, it's wearing off.

"Krasnov" ("Red") Trump has been trying to Make Russia Great Again since at least 1987.

Business projects of Donald Trump in Russia | Trump - Russia relations


__________

__________
#14 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-08-12 03:05 PM
No tariffs and 500 billion invested in the US

That's just another "pacifier" to baby-bully, who needs constant affirmation of his "deal-making greatness"... Apple's total annual capex for 2025 TTM was ~$12.4B including spending outside the US, which will continue.

To get to $500B will take 40 years of non-inflation-adjusted dollars, or 5 years of foregoing annual profits ($99B TTM to date). Of course, with new Trump-induced lower short-term interest rates, higher inflation and policy of weaker ruble, er, US dollar, this may come much sooner.

IOW, "Art of the Con" artist Trump is ---------- us, and Apple and those who depend/relied on NORMAL economic relations with the US are just playing along and for time, until "This, too, shall pass". Trump (and MAGA cult) didn't even understand the backhanded slap in the face when Tim "Apple" Cook presented him with the "golden calf"... er, plaque.

Same with the countries and blocks he made supposed "deals" with, e.g., Japan ($550B) and Korea ($350B) - they don't know what he was bragging about: there was only specific commitments to buy $16.5B worth of US goods, the rest was vague promises of "investment" in loans and IOUs ... and there was nothing about "90% of 'profits' going to the US" ... and nothing was formalized, of course.

Some countries make "deals" only to lower "tariff rates" (taxes on Americans), others don't, but every one is waiting and hoping for lawsuits in US courts to strike tariff authority down.

And as far as "not causing inflation" - remember that companies pay tariffs to Treasury immediately and they did inventory front-running, so we didn't see increases in the consumer pipeline yet... but core CPI moved up at fastest pace in 6mos to annualized 3.1%, and the latest PPI / wholesale core and headline numbers hit 0.9% for July - far above 0.2% expected, most of which will be passed along to consumers and some possibly absorbed by the companies while they are cutting tariff costs by layoffs and automation. So we have both weakening economy and employment, and rising prices - consistent with some forecasts of what was called "stagflation" in the '70s.

And some tariffs increased on August 7, so we haven't seen the effects of that yet.

Something that Trump doesn't [want to] understand : money from tariffs is not "flowing into the US" from other countries - they are paid/transferred to Treasury from American businesses / importers - IOW, it's an internal tax on imports, which was about 13.5% of US economy in recent years. Exports, which represent about 30+% of revenue by S&P 500 companies may also shrink as consumers of other countries "buy local" and boycott American goods if there are alternatives. Las Vegas and other tourist destinations already see some of it.

In July 2025, 71 large US companies filed for bankruptcy. Year-to-date 446 bankruptcies, already surpassing full year totals for 2021, 70 of them in the industrial sector.

IOW, Trump's tariffs may reduce meaningless metric of "US trade deficits" ("Yay, success!") but they are also shrinking world trade... and economies, including the US... which you may not see clearly due to lower USD.

Oh what a tangled web we "weave"...

And CBO projection of One Big Bloody Bu**-Ugly Bill creating additional $3.5T in debt in the next 10 years? I think we can do "better" and do it in 3-4 years, despite all of the imagined DOGE "savings" and "trillions or hundreds of billions of dollars flowing in" in tariffs.

US deficit hit $291B in July - that's an annual pace of $3.5T. July tariffs brought in $25B - Trump called it "incredible revenue" - but the government spent $630B.

"It's the spending, stupid."
__________

__________
#14 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-08-12 03:05 PM
No tariffs and 500 billion invested in the US

That's just another "pacifier" to baby-bully, who needs constant affirmation of his "deal-making greatness"... Apple's total annual capex for 2025 TTM was ~$12.4B including spending outside the US, which will continue.

To get to $500B will take 40 years of non-inflation-adjusted dollars, or 5 years of foregoing annual profits ($99B TTM to date). Of course, with new Trump-induced lower short-term interest rates, higher inflation and policy of weaker ruble, er, US dollar, this may come much sooner.

IOW, "Art of the Con" artist Trump is ---------- us, and Apple and those who depend/relied on NORMAL economic relations with the US are just playing along and for time, until "This, too, shall pass". Trump (and MAGA cult) didn't even understand the backhanded slap in the face when Tim "Apple" Cook presented him with the "golden calf"... er, plaque.

Same with the countries and blocks he made supposed "deals" with, e.g., Japan ($550B) and Korea ($350B) - they don't know what he was bragging about: there was only specific commitments to buy $16.5B worth of US goods, the rest was vague promises of "investment" in loans and IOUs ... and there was nothing about "90% of 'profits' going to the US" ... and nothing was formalized, of course.

Some countries make "deals" only to lower "tariff rates" (taxes on Americans), others don't, but every one is waiting and hoping for lawsuits in US courts to strike tariff authority down.

And as far as "not causing inflation" - remember that companies pay tariffs to Treasury immediately and they did inventory front-running, so we didn't see increases in the consumer pipeline yet... but core CPI moved up at fastest pace in 6mos to annualized 3.1%, and the latest PPI / wholesale core and headline numbers hit 0.9% for July - far above 0.2% expected, most of which will be passed along to consumers and some possibly absorbed by the companies while they are cutting tariff costs by layoffs and automation. So we have both weakening economy and employment, and rising prices - consistent with some forecasts of what was called "stagflation" in the '70s.

And some tariffs increased on August 7, so we haven't seen the effects of that yet.

Something that Trump doesn't [want to] understand : money from tariffs is not "flowing into the US" from other countries - they are paid/transferred to Treasury from American businesses / importers - IOW, it's an internal tax on imports, which was about 13.5% of US economy in recent years. Exports, which represent about 30+% of revenue by S&P 500 companies may also shrink as consumers of other countries "buy local" and boycott American goods if there are alternatives. Las Vegas and other tourist destinations already see some of it.

In July 2025, 71 large US companies filed for bankruptcy. Year-to-date 446 bankruptcies, already surpassing full year totals for 2021, 70 of them in the industrial sector.

IOW, Trump's tariffs may reduce meaningless metric of "US trade deficits" ("Yay, success!") but they are also shrinking world trade... and economies, including the US... which you may not see clearly due to lower USD.

Oh what a tangled web we "weave"...

And CBO projection of One Big Bloody Bu**-Ugly Bill creating additional $3.5T in debt in the next 10 years? I think we can do "better" and do it in 3-4 years, despite all of the imagined DOGE "savings" and "trillions or hundreds of billions of dollars flowing in" in tariffs.

US deficit hit $291B in July - that's an annual pace of $3.5T. July tariffs brought in $25B - Trump called it "incredible revenue" - but the government spent $630B.

"It's the spending, stupid."
__________

__________
#14 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-08-12 03:05 PM
No tariffs and 500 billion invested in the US

That's just another "pacifier" to baby-bully, who needs constant affirmation of his "deal-making greatness"... Apple's total annual capex for 2025 TTM was ~$12.4B including spending outside the US, which will continue.

To get to $500B will take 40 years of non-inflation-adjusted dollars, or 5 years of foregoing annual profits ($99B TTM to date). Of course, with new Trump-induced lower short-term interest rates, higher inflation and policy of weaker ruble, er, US dollar, this may come much sooner.

IOW, "Art of the Con" artist Trump is ---------- us, and Apple and those who depend/relied on NORMAL economic relations with the US are just playing along and for time, until "This, too, shall pass". Trump (and MAGA cult) didn't even understand the backhanded slap in the face when Tim "Apple" Cook presented him with the "golden calf"... er, plaque.

Same with the countries and blocks he made supposed "deals" with, e.g., Japan ($550B) and Korea ($350B) - they don't know what he was bragging about: there was only specific commitments to buy $16.5B worth of US goods, the rest was vague promises of "investment" in loans and IOUs ... and there was nothing about "90% of 'profits' going to the US" ... and nothing was formalized, of course.

Some countries make "deals" only to lower "tariff rates" (taxes on Americans), others don't, but every one is waiting and hoping for lawsuits in US courts to strike tariff authority down.

And as far as "not causing inflation" - remember that companies pay tariffs to Treasury immediately and they did inventory front-running, so we didn't see increases in the consumer pipeline yet... but core CPI moved up at fastest pace in 6mos to annualized 3.1%, and the latest PPI / wholesale core and headline numbers hit 0.9% for July - far above 0.2% expected, most of which will be passed along to consumers and some possibly absorbed by the companies while they are cutting tariff costs by layoffs and automation. So we have both weakening economy and employment, and rising prices - consistent with some forecasts of what was called "stagflation" in the '70s.

And some tariffs increased on August 7, so we haven't seen the effects of that yet.

Something that Trump doesn't [want to] understand : money from tariffs is not "flowing into the US" from other countries - they are paid/transferred to Treasury from American businesses / importers - IOW, it's an internal tax on imports, which was about 13.5% of US economy in recent years. Exports, which represent about 30+% of revenue by S&P 500 companies may also shrink as consumers of other countries "buy local" and boycott American goods if there are alternatives. Las Vegas and other tourist destinations already see some of it.

In July 2025, 71 large US companies filed for bankruptcy. Year-to-date 446 bankruptcies, already surpassing full year totals for 2021, 70 of them in the industrial sector.

IOW, Trump's tariffs may reduce meaningless metric of "US trade deficits" ("Yay, success!") but they are also shrinking world trade... and economies, including the US... which you may not see clearly due to lower USD.

Oh what a tangled web we "weave"...

And CBO projection of One Big Bloody Bu**-Ugly Bill creating additional $3.5T in debt in the next 10 years? I think we can do "better" and do it in 3-4 years, despite all of the imagined DOGE "savings" and "trillions or hundreds of billions of dollars flowing in" in tariffs.

US deficit hit $291B in July - that's an annual pace of $3.5T. July tariffs brought in $25B - Trump called it "incredible revenue" - but the government spent $630B.

"It's the spending, stupid."
__________

__________
#4 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-08-07 06:04 PM
Are corporations using their new tax cuts to buy back their stock, raising the stock price?

There were no significant "new" corporate tax rate cuts or increases in One Big Bloody Budget-Busting Bill - it mostly stopped the tax rate set in 2017's TCJA from expiring at the end of 2025, making it "permanent"... unless and until Congress changes them. It was the same 2017 rate throughout the "great economy" and deficits of both Trump and Dark Brandon. There are some accelerated deductions and amortizations for R&D and other expenses but these are not "new tax cuts" that would materially affect corporations decisions to "buy back their stock."

Also, I don't know why "stock buybacks" would be considered "evil" or such a sore issue for anyone.

They aren't necessarily "raising the stock price" - many public/listed corporations routinely buy back stock to account for dilution, i.e., issuance of new stock as compensation to its employees, including directors, executives, pension and 401(k) plans, stock mergers/buyouts, outside contractors etc.

It's also a tax-preferred way of returning some value to the stock owners, as opposed to direct dividends, which usually drop the price of stock ex-dividend and are taxable, unless in tax-deferred or tax-free accounts.

For example, "Oracle of Omaha" Warren Buffett's Berkshire-Hathaway ($1T market cap) doesn't pay dividends and has often used buybacks, especially during NZIRP times, when he didn't see a better opportunity to invest somewhere else and excess cash from profits didn't yield much in safe deposit accounts.

Buyback is a responsible way for the boards, CEOs and CFOs to manage corporate cash. Large buybacks are often presented to stockholders for a vote.

www.investopedia.com - Buyback

Here's Buffett dropping some wisdom:

www.fool.com -- Warren Buffett Just Issued a Stark Warning to President Trump About the Impact of Tariffs. Buffett calls tariffs "an act of war..." - 2025-03-08

www.fool.com - Warren Buffett's Warning to Wall Street on President Donald Trump's Tariffs Is Deafening - 2025-08-09
__________

__________
Redneck Recession Hits Working-class the Hardest

Recessions usually do; and felt first by the lower quintiles.

Wall Street and Silicon Valley are booming ...

Not quite accurate. It only looks like it because "rising tide lifts all/most boats" and the way the market indexes and passive investment funds work.

Mag Seven now account for 35.4% of S&P 500. That's almost 3x in 2015, when they were 12.3% of SPX - near concentration in financial sector in 2006-7, before 2008 GFC.

62% own stocks. Top 10% own 93% of the value. Top 1% own 50% of the value.

blogs.cfainstitute.org - Myth-Busting: The Economy Drives the Stock Market

.

"Manufacturing is in recession. Construction is in a deep recession. Transportation and distribution is in recession. Wholesaling is in recession. Retail is holding on by its thumbs..."

This is not a new information. This has been true - and I've been pointing it out here all through the election season - since Biden's $1.3T "Inflation Reduction Act" and "Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act" passed. Remember elections, when most people said that economy was #1 issue... in addition to "culture war" issues unfavorable to Dems?

news.gallup.com - 2024 October Gallup poll

Reduced to single "compound average" numbers, the 'GDP growth,' 'unemployment' and 'inflation' have been misleading and sending false signals for a long time, because stocks went up on AI investment spigot and top quintiles kept spending, putting money back into economy. Some people here (who no longer post) were sure about Dems' win because "US economy is the envy of the world" and good official NUMBERS 'under Biden'... apparently ignoring or not seeing the distribution and "personal economy" of majority of voters.

www.bloomberg.com - The Mighty American Consumer Is Powered by Higher Earners - Oct 15, 2024

www.vice.com - Rich People Are Powering the Economy - No One Else Has Money - 2025-02-25
|------- The top 10% of earners are responsible for 49.7% of all spending in the United States. ... in 1995, the top 10% of earners made up 36% of all spending. -------|

What is true is that Trump's stupid antics (aka "negotiation style") and mish-mash of economic goals (can't call any of this "policies" when they contradict each other and can be turned on a dime) has rapidly accelerated deceleration or "real" economy, when even top quintile and largest businesses are now being negatively affected, e.g. see Amazon's latest Q report; shares of delivery companies like UPS are down from 2021 peaks.

"Bring manufacturing home!" is a slogan, not a policy; it make no sense when the US manufacturing sector accounts for the same economic share of GDP but with the fraction of people employed at the peak in 70s, and that manufacturing sector is already in need of some 400,000 jobs "with appropriate skills" that employers can't fill. Is it parties' bright idea to mandate a shift from high value-add to low value-add "manufacturing" jobs?

.

He believes that as much as a third of the US economy is already effectively in recession.

That's why government's view of "economy" has been so different from most people's for years.

Hard economic data has been sus since at least April, soft data shows overall economy is now decelerating faster.
__________

__________
#9 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-08-09 12:01 AM
This deal ends 35 years of fighting.

upload.wikimedia.org - map

If you knew anything at all about more than 35 years of Nagorno-Karabakh ('Artsakh Republic') conflicts and Lachin corridor (en.wikipedia.org - whatever replaces it to be named "Trump road"?), you would know that the "deal" which kind of "ended" conflict was the 1-day offensive of Azerbaijan forces in September of 2023 after they choked off the only road to Armenian enclave ("protected" by 2020 Russia-brokered ceasefire) and almost all Armenians who were able, fled to Armenia.

"On September 28 2023, the president of Artsakh signed a decree to dissolve all state institutions and existence of the Artsakh Republic to an end by January 1 2024."

'Artsakh Republic' no longer exists... neither does the conflict. Nothing to fight over since Sept 2023. In 2024 both countries had peace treaty talks; in April 2024 outline of peace agreement, with 1991 post-Soviet borders and land handover was approved by Blinken.

No "peace" was "brokered" by Trump.

Armenia (former member of Russia's 'mini-NATO' lookalike CSTO) is pissed at Putin who promised protection, but removed his "peacekeeping" troops. It since looked for security (from Azerbaijan and Turkey threats) to the US and EU.

www.newsweek.com - Putin Caught Off Guard as His 'Mini-NATO' Falls Apart - NW, 2024-02-23

.

#14 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-08-09 10:43 AM
The leaders of both countries have said that Trump was instrumental in getting the peace deal done.

What did you expect? It's part of the same sad script in the spectacle and charade that "Man of Peace" Trump is running, chasing Nobel Peace Prize.

Did you know that he tasked "Little" Marco Rubio to find whoever wherever want to sign the already negotiated peace agreements and bring them to White House for signing ceremony, even when (as he himself admitted) Trump has no idea of the origins and why there were hostilities in the first place?

The scenario of grift: Trump commits US taxpayers money/support for some project the parties want (and name it "TRUMP something"), claims credit and is publicly praised for "brokering peace" and one/both of them nominate him for Nobel Peace Prize... hoping that either the number of nominations will do it or at least he can boast and complain that he didn't get it despite all the "nominations"... as he already did during Congo-Rwanda signing.

You remember "celebrating" Congo-Rwanda sham-wow "peace accord" Trump claimed credit for and promised "US support" just a month ago?
drudge.com and drudge.com - "Congo and Rwanda Sign a US Mediated Peace Deal" - June 29, 2025

Ready to send in the Marines?: news.un.org - UN: Armed militia kill hundreds in eastern DRC - 2025-08-06
|------- Hopes for peace in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) have been shaken by a surge in brutal attacks on civilians by armed groups, including the Rwandan-backed M23 militia. ... "despite the ceasefire that was recently signed in Doha..." -------|

.

#19 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-08-09 11:04 AM
It's insane that you view EVERYTHING through a Trump lens.

It's insane that you have not a bit of curiosity or critical thinking when it comes to anything Trump - for Trump, EVERYTHING is really ALL about TRUMP!

Congratulations, "You've been Apprenticed!"(TM)
__________

Drudge Retort
 

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy