" it was that close after the FBI director came out and said she was still part of an active investigation."

While not mentioning the Republican nominee was ALSO under investigation.

Can anyone say thumb on the scale?!?

Sounds like the only fix is more tax cuts for the world's wealthiest.

"with the Clinton foundation."

What a riot.

Foundations are, by their nature, very transparent.

When HRC was about to run for President, she'd been investigated for decades, especially via the Foundation.

And after going through the CF with a fine-toothed comb, Republicans decided to attack her on Benghazi, for not sending in troops to save Americans...despite the fact as Secretary of State, she's nowhere in the military chain of command.

" you have no issues with Trans men using woman's locker rooms."

Trans women use stalls, like all the other women in a women's rest room.

Anyone using "trans" as a smokescreen to prey on women didn't need the "trans" part to begin with.

"'efficiency' shakeup"

That should join the Hall of Shame alongside "alternative facts".

What they really mean, though, is "sabotage".

"Iran Purchased Advanced MANPAD"

Oh, now you went and did it.

Now Trump is going to demand his own MANPAD.

He'll schittt himself, when he hears he can schitttt himself.

One of my longtime friends grew up speaking Ukrainian. She would chuckle every time someone suggested the Berlin Wall came down via political success. She said it was washing machines, and color TVs. The populace had been consistently told they had it better than the West.

In that vein, her Ukrainian grandmother came to visit (in the 80s), and cried the first time she saw abundant out-of-season vegetables at the grocery store. Through her tears, she turned to her granddaughter and said "They have lied to us."

"Was the USSR not a true republic?"

In the 1970s, my HS Russian teacher brought in two native Ukrainians to speak to the class. When we referred to them as Russians, we were quickly upbraided: They were NOT Russians, they were Soviets.

I'm guessing National Fascist Party didn't poll well....

"he's the one who likes to repeat the propaganda-laden name of the German Nazi party whenever possible."

Yet he can never point to a single act they did while in power which qualifies as Socialism.

Never.

Not a single instance.

"First lie < 4 min in"

That's an easy wager.

I'm betting < 4 sentences in.

"They just blanket everybody."

No they don't. They specifically avoid the criminals and gang members. You know...the ones they told us they'd go after.

Instead, they're remanding janitors, day laborers, and abuelas who've been here 40 years.

"she does not deserve this. She is the sweetest person, and she prayed for you."

What a fool, to believe any of those things matter in Trumplandia.

Her skin is darker, and she probably speaks with an accent.

Trump rests his case.

"That is not a point"

Of course it is. You've long held those who died on J7 or J8, in large part from occurrences on J6 (according to the attending physician), means no one died ON J6.

It's akin to spitting on the graves of those who survived until 9/12.

"This incident happened 6 months ago"

The point is, if you die on 9/12 from injuries sustained on 9/11, that's NOT a 9/11 death...right?

J6 rules, amirite?

"I don't think an injured knee is normally considered as a cause of death."

He could have internal bleeding yet to be discovered. But that's okay: it doesn't matter anymore, because if he dies tomorrow, that doesn't count. J6 rules, right? .

"An injured knee. He ended up on the hood of the car."

But if he dies tomorrow, that doesn't count, right?

We're still living by "J6 Rules"...right?!?

"Bottom line..."

...is you would have a 180 degree different reaction if the letters after the name were different, and we all know it.

That's the textbook definition of a partisan hack: your morals change with the parties.

"She didn't have any actionable information to investigate."

That's like saying no Covid testing means no Covid.

Your logic is so circular you should serve mustard with the pretzels.

"How does that happen?"

Maybe an investigation would've answered that question.

Meanwhile, if the letters were reversed, the lack of FBI investigation would be unacceptable to you.

And you'd be right.

"She didn't know the year."

I couldn't remember the year of my heart attack.

You're pretending that's a barometer of IT NOT HAPPENING.

"The allegations were complete BS"

You have no proof of that claim. ZERO.

Meanwhile, my claim is clearly true: the FBI NEVER INTERROGATED the named witness. Not a single time.

Only partisan hacks believe that's acceptable. And you're too much of a coward to admit, if the letters were reversed, you'd be having a conniption fit.

"It's ok with me because it was a bogus allegation."

You can't prove that. All that can be proved is the FBI didn't interrogate the sole named witness, either under oath, or otherwise.

It's only a bogus allegation because of your (R)easons. If there was a (D) after the name, you'd be screeching about FBI corruption.

And you'd be right.

"This is how an interview would have gone"

If it was that innocent, it would've happened. And the FBI CHOSE NOT to follow-up on other allegations. The same folks advocating for Kavanaugh's confirmation were the ones "running" the investigation.

In related news, Comey and McCabe both got audited, a statistical near-impossibility, especially in an era with so few audits.

"It's ok with me"

The only honest phrase you've posted.

" She named 4 people, none of whom had any recollection of the incident."

How many of those people did the FBI question under oath? Oh that's right, zero.

You still haven't answered my question: why is that OK with you?

" Track down 4500 bogus "leads"."

No, just the credible ones. Of course they couldn't even start with the first lead.

"How stupid do you think the FBI is?"

Not stupid, corrupt. And definitely corrupt if they won't even question the named witness.

You still haven't directly addressed my direct questions. I won't respond to anything else from you until you do.

Stop deflecting. Start with explain explaining why you think it's OK the FBI didn't interview the named witness.