this happened as described in the Post report, it was, at best, a war crime under federal law. I say "at best" because, as regular readers know, I believe the attacks on these suspected drug boats " without congressional authorization, under circumstances in which the boat operators pose no military threat to the United States, and given that narcotics trafficking is defined in federal law as a crime rather than as terrorist activity, much less an act or war " are lawless and therefore that the killings are not legitimate under the law or armed conflict. (See my Saturday column, with links to prior posts on this subject.) read more
A federal judge on Tuesday ordered several Texas public school districts to take down posters displaying the Ten Commandments ... read more
would alter that to say property "occupant" who can refuse entry to anyone.
And I would agree. Based on whatever the owner requires. Probably in a contract or memorandum of agreement of some sort.