-Seems like a black man would be proud of the states that beat the slavers instead of the states that fought to keep you in chains til the very end.

Blacks that live below the Mason-Dixon line are prohibited from pride in their home state?

Sucksoftly gets funnier and funnier.

-It is nice seeing you quote an expert and a genius.

What else would you expect from me?

-Like the farmers, they voted with the expectation that they either wouldn't be affected or they'd get preferential bailouts.

That's a reasonable expectation

Or, like everyone else, they think they can spot where Trump is lying and where he's not.

On this issue ... maybe they didn't take him seriously

-Could you be any more disgusting?

By accusing a grieving widow of being a faker?

I can't imagine making such an accusation.

and he doesn't think she faked a damn thing. None of you do.

We can all agree there were opportunists who took advantage of the situation to push their agenda and recruit sympathetic folks away from their opposition.

But it's in very poor taste to make such an awful accusation.

Next thing will be accusing folks of staging assassination attempts.

That would be really out of bounds, though.....

-Awwww look at ---------- trying so hard to be upset.

Fake outrage is a real problem here.

I smell it everywhere.

but it's really just shock. I didn't think you were this big of an uncaring monster.

:-)

-Which makes Mavericks "the left hates law enforcement" post speculative BS.

Yeah, it's along the lines of how hate gets assigned to political parties all the time with group after group.

-Filming it and posting it on social media? Performance.

ABC News covered it live. You understand that, right?

"pawing at his hands and crying and saying I love you ..."

what else? The tears? Her voice cracking up at times?

The personal stories?

-Filming it and posting it on social media? Performance.

Gee...I guess that puts every person speaking with emotion at a funeral service that made its way to the internet up for suspicion of being "performance".

The fact it was filmed and put on youtube makes it less than genuine?

I don't know if she approved scripts like what Miller said but if she did....then yes, she's guilty of allowing it to go too far.

But you're full of it on the criticism of her speech. and you know it.

"it's unbeleivable how much the Left hates Law Inforcement"

and farmers in ed states that voted for Trump

Not farmers in blue States that voted for Trump. Just the ones in red states.

LOL

-No, I don't think she's genuine.

Which part?

Tell me which part of her "performance" isn't genuine?

12

In a manner of speaking, they will/are.

Agriculture is a pretty big industry and let's be honest....it's huge for the republicans.

And there's nothing stopping the democrats from reaching out to the farmers and promising them what they want.

For the specific moron above........If businesses truly suffer, then the CEO is likely to suffer along with it as a significant shareholder.

and "suffer" is a relative term. Meaning if the company is worth less, then the CEO is impacted.

64

Agreed

He's lying

They KNEW this was going to happen. Between the tariffs and the loss of most of their immigrant workers, they are claiming they will be bankrupt by this time next year.

And I cheer it on.

It's time these ----- got to the Find Out stage.

POSTED BY SYCOPHANT AT 2025-09-23 07:27 PM | REPLY

JPW thinks Erica was genuine.

We can question the sincerity of everyone else.

But JPW moved the goalposts from her to everyone else.

On purpose

These greedy ------ screw the employees anyway.

Nice to see some empathy for these bastards. Taking them at their word and shedding a tear.

LOL

Remember ... ..these CEOs knew what farmers knew ... ... and they supported Trump anyway.

Now we care what pain these CEOs are experiencing?

-Why should blue states bail them out again?

The reasons should be obvious.

But regardless ... ... they will.

surely it's easy to find something else to fire her for and stay away from the "policy difference alone" restriction

I'm not criticizing Slaughter for anything but let's pretend she's a complete trainwreck and needs to be fired.

What's supposed to happen? who can fire her?

there comes a point where people are just too well off to need SS on which to live--they have other assets, savings and retirement income sources. Those folks should get what they paid in, and very little more, because others in this country need financial support more."

With regard to those who pay the maximum into SS throughout their working lives....what makes you think they don't "get what they paid in, and very little more"?

The people I describe have an awfully hard time getting back more than what was paid in.

-I'm suggesting that you, as a self-proclaimed "centrist", may find the upcoming season more appealing with the change.

fair enough

but as a self proclaimed centrist, I don't care about the changes. If it's funny, it's funny. nothing else matters.

-Since you apparently know how Trumpy's mind works

what are you talking about?