-So Concerned about "the Jews".

Most of the left can't stand you but they rarely call you the anti-Semite you are.

I guess ragging on MAGA folks gets you pass but they know you're a holocaust denying anti-Semite.

40

Did you think you had something there?

#18 | POSTED BY SYCOPHANT

-Says the bath house guy who sucks the hard on

It's hard to imagine the bath house guys tolerating that moronic fool.

Snoofy is the Cliff Clavin of the DR.

Wait ... ..no, that's not fair ... ... ..to Cliff

Cliff had a job
Cliff had some friends

We know Snoofy has neither.

"Good that John Deere is suffering. ------------- voted for Trump!!!!"

-speaksoftly and his band of merrymen.

"---- people who use religion to justify being complete pieces of ----."

I can do that without the need to use religion.

Using religion to be a POS is just plain lazy.

give an effort if you're going to be a complete POS.

Like me....

I can't read the article....what does "seem poised" mean?

House fires are a fairly frequent occurrence. No reason to leap to the conclusion it's violence until we actually know something.

I know.....it's more fun to take it down the road of where -------- wants to take it.

And maybe it will go there.....if so, then fine.

"Eberly Is MAGA"

-Effetetrumpvoter

"a return to a status quo"

says who?

Where is the leadership in the democratic party saying anything like that to farmers and these organizations?

You not making the connection. You're jumping to the part where a lot of influential people just magically come to the conclusion you think they should.

It's not done by telepathy.

It's why these organizations exist and I were a serious democrat wanting to influence these people, there is a process.

I have to go for a while.

It's apparent someone is trying to stay no more than 2 inches from my ---- on every thread and with every post.

Thank you all for ignoring that little twerp like I am.

This is a great discussion.......

-The Democratic Party is dead.

If I posted that you'd all blow a gasket.

And if you really believed that, then you wouldn't be so hard on farmers for voting for Trump.......

2

Covid killed them as well...and yet she's still there.

-Texas is not an "excuse". Saying it is an excuse implies that California would have done this anyway.

agreed.

35

all fair points and I'm not okay with what Texas is doing.

-Are you saying the independent commission was intentionally skewing our districts?

That's the job of the various organizations who are qualified to sue the State for gerrymandering and let the courts rule. See North Carolina

The absence of any kind of litigation tells us that argument is hard to make.

IOW, it's unfair.....but it's not illegal.

What California is seemingly trying to do will likely be called illegal.....and I hope Texas is sued over this.

-You keep pulling this bulls(*& line as if it's not clear that anything is better than what the GOP is currently selling.

It's not --------. You yourself said the leadership is crap and Clown agrees with you.

I sincerely wish the democratic party would sell their advantages to these groups. Not just hope they decide on their own.

Why in the hell do you think these associations exist? If your view is simply "well, they should just know not to support a demented old fool...." then you're not understanding how important these relationships are.

27

California can do what they want.

But something tells me that until now, you didn't know Californias representation in the US House was already very skewed in favor of the democratic party.

Texas is being transparent in what they are doing which certainly doesn't make it right. It's outright gerrymandering.

But the end result is a very disproportionate representation in DC.

But they all have to work hard to reach the level of this in Massachusetts....which is a 9-0 win for democrats.

But it's not considered gerrymandering in Mass because democrats are genuinely spread out throughout the state.

You can call it unfair....but it's legal.

Again, I'll believe it when I see California actually do what you want them to do.......all because "But but but....Texas" is their excuse.

I think cooler heads will prevail in the end. But maybe I'm too optimistic. I'm accused of that routinely.

21

They could start by sitting down with lobbyists and the Executive director and the board of the American Soybean association.

Shouldn't the democrats make this an issue?

Run on the bailout as being necessary only because of horrible incompetence in the first place.

Point out that even with this bailout, farmers are still suffering unnecessarily. It could have been avoided. IOW, outright point the finger at the entire republican party for this mess.

Is it futile? Meaning that even if the democrats did this....they still can't expect to get anywhere some swing states? Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, etc....can't they pick up seats in congress and turn some of those states blue in the presidential election over this issue?

-Thanks for proving my point #2.

I'm glad you view my words as "proof".

But it's really just agreement.

15

which republicans? elected officials or farmers?

-Any comment on point #2?

an embargo that's not worked...or at least not worked yet and comes with significant consequences....that any thinking person would have known would lead to this bailout.

-No it wasn't. Obama gave us the Republican plan. It didn't even have a public option for Christ sake.

Look, the republican party has contributed nothing to health care reform. They offer nothing as an alternative to Obamacare.

But.........ACA is entirely a democratic party product. Good or bad. It was the outcome of a compromise amongst democrats.....with zero republican votes.

No public option? democrats couldn't agree on it.

ACA may have been copied from a previously republican party based plan......but so what? calling republicans hypocrites is accurate.....but it's hardly relevant at this point.

And it certainly wasn't perfect. Leading democrats made that very clear at the time.

Howard Dean
Dennis Kusinich

those guys thought ACA was a giveaway to insurance companies......so no....not perfect.

Not our first embargo.

"In 1979, US President Jimmy Carter issued an embargo on the export of wheat to the Soviet Union as a response to the Soviet"Afghan War. But the embargo did not bring any positive effect to the USA. The Soviet Union eluded the embargo by increasing its domestic wheat production and importing from other countries. The Reagan administration lifted the embargo in 1981, but US farmers suffered financially, leading the US government to introduce bailout programs to the dairy industry. Bailouts helped the dairy industry to increase production however the US government had to buy all oversupply. Later the Reagan administration spent $100 million annually to store and transport all dairy oversupply worth $3 billion from the previous administration.[17][12]"

9

Oh, it's a huge screw up on Trump's part. That's what makes it different.

Not the size of the bailout.

18

just what you referenced.