Texas banned photographic evidence of traffic infractions several years ago.

... when I drive I take the necessary steps to be aware of my surroundings at all time ...

I received my first drivers license in 1969 to operate a 5 h.p. or less motor cycle. I quickly learned the roads were not friendly to me. I became a defensive driver out of necessity, live or die. A learned behavior I practice to this date. I'm ever watchful of the complete and total idiots around me.

#12 Try 9. 11 is a glitch.

The other stupid is ... the Third Amendment. An issue not raised in a very long time.
www.courthousenews.com

Just reinforced the Bill of Rights.

Yeah but the problem is the need. Why? It's too fundamental.

Biden FBI Spied on Eight Republican Senators as Part of Arctic Frost Investigation, Grassley Oversight Reveals
www.judiciary.senate.gov
...
#173 | Posted by oneironaut

You seem as ignorant as the Senator's rhetoric which you willfully swallowed. Hook. Line. Sinker.

The investigation collected metadata, a.k.a. "dialed digits" and the information it provides. Information you, or Senators, voluntarily give to third parties is not and has never been confidential or private. I'm not aware of any instance of a Senator's substantive content being accessed, please correct me if I'm wrong.

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin
#172 | Posted by SpeakSoftly

Mayall et al. Excellent.

I think this is just another case of the Buffoon's alligator mouth overloading his hummingbird ass. I'm having trouble imagining a legal basis for this and of course the Buffoon offers none, why am I not surprised? Same with the defense stock crap but there there may be some contractual hook.

A f*****g talking head. Useless. I quit watching TV news years ago because I can't stand idiots talking at me.

BTW, its 8 not 3.

Sending ALL registered voters a mail in ballot (18 states do this) is a recipe for fraud.

Reality told 'em it ain't just you.

So, reality slapped 'em up sideda head.

#79 | Posted by BillJohnson

So, instead of reading and learning you just make s**t up.

None of those links are about opinions. They are all about "empirical studies," you know, data not opinion.

And another thing, in what nucking universe are ballots transported on planes or any other bulk transportation method?

Ballots are moved from precincts to central counting locations within a county. Bulk transportation would be inefficient.

Some are afraid to admit to themselves they are just wrong. They might understand very well what I'm saying and they don't like it because it makes sense.

After all these years Bill states a truth.

There are professionals who study voter fraud and anomalies, down to the granular level. Those professionals can't find what Bill opines yet he soldiers on. Oblivious to the meekest of scholarship.

"There's no problem with money in politics."

--Politicians Republicans everywhere.

FTFY

Both Democrats and Republicans benefited from hundreds of millions of dollars in dark money in 2024. More spending backed Democrats, as has been the case since the 2018 midterm elections (before which more dark money typically favored Republicans). The presidential race was the source of much of this disparity in last year's cycle.

Overall, dark money groups boosting Democrats put up about $1.2 billion to influence 2024 elections, while groups boosting Republicans accounted for about $664 million.

For God's sakes give it up. The 2020 election has been examined under a microscope inside out, upside down, forward and backwards for five years. A few anomalies have turned up as is typical with all national elections but nothing amounting to 300K votes.

Not even close.

Not even in the parking lot much less the ballpark.

So, an opinion piece. WTF should I give a s**t what this person I've never heard of has to say?

You need to read the ruling...

I did. As I do with most court rulings. Your interpretation of this case is off base. The Court said the Buffoon ain't showed legal authority to do this. Yet. The Buffoon fights another day. So sayeth the SC.

I'm guessing you're not familiar with court procedure but dissents don't mean s**t.

Seemed like a typical "60 Minutes" piece, factual and through.

Unless Weiss has some undisclosed insider info, I don't see the problem other than it's critical of the Buffoon.

#17

Don't know. However, the change to Kennedy was a specific amendment of the Act establishing the "National Cultural Center" signed by President Eisenhower.

Sorry, -- the formatting.