Marin Scotten: Democratic Representative John Larson erupted during a Department of Government Efficiency House Oversight Committee hearing Wednesday, verbalizing the immense frustration felt by much of the country. read more
"DOGE Has 10 Staffers at Social Security in Hunt for Dead People," the headlines read this past week. I found a dead person on Social Security. Right here in Seattle, on Capitol Hill. Of course the circumstances of Ned Johnson's death were completely the opposite of what Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency had claimed was rampant. "You wake up one day and discover you're dead," Johnson told me. "It's been truly surreal."
Hundreds of researchers at Columbia University Irving Medical Center are starting to get notice of canceled grants as President Donald Trump's administration slashes $400 million in federal funding to the university. read more
Radley Balko: We're in dire times. The opposition party should start acting like it. read more
Clinical trials have been delayed, contracts canceled and support staff fired. With deeper cuts coming, some are warning of potential harms to veterans. read more
Oklahoma man says Social Security benefits terminated without warning or explanationwww.wkrn.com
An Oklahoma City retiree said his Social Security benefits were suspended without warning " and with no explanation given when he reached out. He worries it may have to do with the place he was born, and ongoing Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) cutbacks.
The man, James McCaffrey, who was born to an active-duty U.S. soldier at an overseas Army base, said because of recent comments from DOGE leader Elon Musk, he's worried his benefits were cut because of his foreign birthplace.
McCaffrey said he started to think something was often when he received an unexpected Medicare bill.
"It said that I needed to pay $740 before the 25th of this month or I was going to lose my Medicare," McCaffrey said.
That seemed odd, since his Medicare payment is normally deducted from his Social Security check.
"So I called Medicare," he said. "They returned my call after a wait and told me that they were unable to process it through my Social Security payment, that there was some problem with it. We talked for a bit. He kind of let it out that he thinks it's a possibility that my Social Security was suspended."
And yet another inexplicable deportation:
Brown Medicine doctor deported despite federal court order. What we know.www.providencejournal.com
A federal court order that would have halted the immediate deportation of a Rhode Island doctor was issued Friday evening while the doctor's departing plane sat on the tarmac at Boston Logan International Airport, said a family friend and colleague.
But the plane ultimately took off, carrying Dr. Rasha Alawieh out of the country for reasons still unclear to her family, her lawyer and Brown Medicine colleagues such as Dr. Basma Merhi.
"They did not do anything to stop the plane," said Merhi, who was learning details of the event through information relayed by Alawieh family members. "So, clearly, they wanted to deport her regardless of if there was a judge's order or not. She didn't do anything wrong."
Alawieh had been studying and working in the U.S. for the last six years and had been in Rhode Island, working for Brown Medicine in the Division of Kidney Disease & Hypertension, since last July.
She worked at Rhode Island Hospital evaluating potential transplant recipients and followed the progress of those patients after their procedures, Dr. George Bayliss, the transplant division's medical director, said Saturday.
A 37 year old architect from India, who was enrolled in a PHD program at Columbia and due to graduate in May, fled to Canada after the US recently revoked her Visa and sent ICE agents to her apartment:
Laura Seay
@texasinafrica.bsky.social
Before Mahmoud Khalil's detention last week, ICE came for a Columbia PhD student. She had nothing to do with the Gaza protests, but was arrested last spring during a roundup while trying to walk home. Charges were dismissed. The State Department still revoked her visa.
Archive link to avoid paywall:
archive.ph
Just as with the DOGE layoffs and cuts, the Trump administration is not taking any kind of due dilligence or care as they carry out these actions. What makes anyone think they will behave any differently when they come after some program that you or someone you loves depend upon? They aren't, and they won't.
#13 | Posted by Bluewaffles
Hey, you're back. Is this like if someone says your name 3 times or like if you build it, he will come?
drudge.com
LOL
Gotta keep in mind that, unlike pretty much every other prez in hisotry, Trump wants the economy to fail. It assists him in manipulating the stock market and profiting from shorting it.
#4 | Posted by censored
Trump also wants the government to fail. Hello? That way he can justify all the cuts and executive orders he has already written as well as the ones he has ready to go the moment he is able to declare even more emergency orders that will give him unlimited and unfettered power over just about everything and in such a way that not even the courts will be able to stop him.
President Trump is testing the limits of emergency powers--againwww.npr.org
Goitein, of the Brennan Center, says determining those limits is crucial. "There are powers that are available in a national emergency that are far more potent, including powers to shut down communications facilities, to control domestic transportation, to freeze Americans' assets without any due process or any judicial [approval]," she says. "So this question of 'What are the limits on a president's ability to abuse emergency powers?' is an absolutely crucial one for not just our individual liberties but for our democracy."
The question is how emergency powers are used--and for how long and with what limits.
Scheppele has studied how democracies, like Hungary, can turn toward autocracy. For her, the key question about the use of emergency powers is not whether they are legal--because lawful powers can be abused, she notes.
"The question is, does it move the president toward using powers that make it very difficult for powers ever to be taken out of his hands?" she says. "Autocracy is really about the executive capturing power and not letting it go."
With that in mind, she's watching to see whether declaring emergencies becomes a routine way for the Trump administration to push through policies over the objections of Congress or the public, sidelining the debates, compromises and checks and balances baked into democracy.
I called Gillibrand and Schumer on Wed. and asked them to vote no on the Republican budget. I had one qualm, however: how would the shutdown affect the court cases being brought against Trump, Musk and OMP, some of which are starting to bear fruit? Two of my favorite online pundits have been weighing in on the topic: Josh Marshall and Marcy Wheeler.
Here are their latest takes, both of which are worth considering, IMO:
Looking Squarely at a Shutdowntalkingpointsmemo.com
It's hard to write clearly when you're being flooded with new information. But here goes. I've heard people arguing the "yes' on cloture" argument, essentially saying, "don't assume you can shut DOGE down, undo the damage. It's not a silver bullet." I can only speak for myself, but if anyone is thinking, based on the arguments I've made, that this is a silver bullet and if Democrats just do this we can shut this whole thing down, I haven't been clear. I will further say that while the things I've written over the last week or so make it pretty clear where I stand on this, I have several times over the last week had a hard think with myself: are you sure you're right about this? I'm not sure I'd say this is a close call. But it's a hard call, for me at least. Both options hold out possibilities of calamity and destruction I've never seriously contemplated before. That is simply where we are. I wish we weren't here. But we are here.
And:
Democrats Have to Stop Making Political Decisions with an Eye Towards 2026
I'm agnostic about whether a shutdown brings more advantage than risks.
One thing I am absolutely certain of, however, is that Democrats on both sides of this debate are framing it in terms of 2026. . . .This mindset has plagued both sides of Democratic debates for two months, with disastrous consequences.
Democracy will be preserved or lost in the next three months. And democracy will be won or lost via a nonpartisan political fight over whether enough Americans want to preserve their way of life to fight back, in a coalition that includes far more than Democrats. You win this fight by treating Trump and Elon as the villain, not by making any one Democrat a hero (or worse still, squandering week after week targeting Democratic leaders while letting Elon go ignored). . . .
I get the anger with Schumer--though I do think his concerns about the courts need to be taken very seriously.
But until Democrats stop thinking in terms of their own leadership in Congress but instead think exclusively about winning the political fight with people being hurt, not as Democrats, but as people opposed to fascism, they're going to be looking for power in the wrong places.
www.emptywheel.net
Pres Trump has divided this great Country to the point that he has his followers ascribing "enemy" to those who disagree with him.
Oh, it's about to get a lot worse. Deportations and arrests lie ahead for those who are bold enough to disagree with him publicly:
Aaron Rupar
@atrupar.com
Pam Bondi: "If you're gonna touch a Tesla, go to a dealership, do anything, you better watch out, because we're coming after you."
bsky.app
I agree protesters shouldn't damage Teslas, but if it's okay to protest outside of a Planned Parenthoods, I think you should be able to protest outside a Tesla dealership, but we know that's not what's going to happen:
theconversation.com