Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News

Drudge Retort

User Info

gal_tuesday

Subscribe to gal_tuesday's blog Subscribe

Menu

Special Features

Friday, February 28, 2025

Tom Nichols: The president of the United States ambushed a loyal ally, presumably so that he can soon make a deal with the dictator of Russia to sell out a European nation fighting for its very existence.


Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth last week ordered U.S. Cyber Command to stand down from all planning against Russia, including offensive digital actions, according to three people familiar with the matter. read more


David Frum: Trump and Vance have revealed to Americans and to America's allies their alignment with Russia, and their animosity toward Ukraine in general and its president in particular. The truth is ugly, but it's necessary to face it.


Media suppression, voter suppression, and military control are the dials that the Trump administration will begin turning up as their popularity declines. Expect all to get much, much worse before the midterms.


Thursday, February 27, 2025

There are some useful resources online that seek to track which Project 2025 goals have already been achieved, but for all that Trump has done so far, some of Project 2025's most radical ideas for transforming the power of the president have yet to unfold. What is still in store? An ambitious plan to expand the power of the presidency is just getting started.


Comments

"There is a much more accurate way to describe who Donald Trump is: He is a gangster. He governs like a gangster. And if you think of him not as any variety of politician but rather as a gangster"who sits atop not a political party, but a gang"his actions make perfect sense."
www.hamiltonnolan.com

Keep in mind Trump is not the top gangster in the world; the guy he bows down to is:

Hamilton Nolan
@hamiltonnolan.bsky.social
It is clear that there is an answer to "What does Russia have on Trump?" that has not been uncovered yet and whoever lands that story is getting a mega Pulitzer

Are these cuts necessary? Considering the way it's being done and communicated, I'd say no.
Meaning the cuts won't be strategic....just cutting to cut.
And that will lead to more problems....and a media devoted to hammering it step by step.
#40 | Posted by eberly

Yes, they are just cutting to cut. This has never been about cost cutting and saving money. That's how it's being marketed, but the truth is this has always been about P2025 & the GOP's desire to drastically reduce the size of the federal govt and to corral what is left of the federal work force under auspices of "the unitary executive" i.e. the president:

Mapping the DOGE Game Plan: New Details on Which Contracts Get Axed

Let's start with my story from last night about the abrupt and reckless cancelation of upwards of a thousand VA contracts totaling roughly $2 billion and covering a huge variety of work VA does, everything from funeral care to doctor recruitment. As I reported last night, VA contract officers were sent an Excel spreadsheet of almost a thousand contracts in the early morning of February 21st, told that all of these contracts should be canceled and that if anyone wanted to make a case to spare individual contracts they had until the end of business that day (February 21st) to make their case. My sources noted that the contract code on all of these contracts was NAICS " 541611, which is "Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services." It's very clear the DOGE people pulled up everything under that label and slated it to be cut. My sources' impressions are that the DOGErs making these decisions read that label as basically, McKinsey/MBA consulting type --------, easy stuff to cut. At VA, most of it wasn't that at all. But they didn't seem to make any attempt to look under the hood at what those contracts were.


talkingpointsmemo.com

Drudge Retort
 

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy