I have no problem with her having an exciting sex life. More power to her.

I just judge conservatives for their hypocrisy. If a liberal politician did that they would have crucified her. Carried on about "family values" and the depravity of liberals. But when it is one of their own they are suspiciously quiet. I just wish they were quiet all the time.

There are a bunch of Republicans looking for a scapegoat (or a bunch of scapegoats) after the midterms. I think they will impeach him to try to distance themselves from something that the voters have made clear they disapprove of.

But it will not be because of any values or moral fiber that Republicans have. Just cold, self serving political calculus.

Tariffs are no different than corporate taxes.
Except localized on particular products.

#3 | Posted by oneironaut

Corporate taxes are taxes on profits. Tariffs are taxes on the price of goods. Tariffs push up prices similar to a sales tax.

Tariffs are not passed on 100% to consumers because you have local producers who are not targeted by tariffs. But, as more people buy their cheaper products, they will raise their prices (law of supply and demand). And, some of their inputs will have to come from sources targeted by tariffs (or local suppliers who raise their prices due to increased demand) so most of the tariff will eventually get passed on to consumers.

Corporate tax increases are shared by shareholders, employees, and consumers.

The Emperor Has No Clothes

#10 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY

Careful... You'll get Trump excited.

This is why he always gets the WWE vote. It's not about the content; it's about the performance.

#9 | Posted by sentinel

Welcome to the Idiocracy.

Republicans, you built that. ;)

If it turns out Peltolta wins by less votes cast for the other sullivan then it's going to be quite the ---- show.
To be honest....I didn't think the democrats had it in them to pull this.

#24 | Posted by eberly

Alaska uses Ranked Choice Voting. So if people are confused they can just vote for both of them. Makes it a lot less likely to affect the outcome of the election.

Tell us parts alarm you, and why.

#36 | Posted by snoofy

Government ownership of the means of production, because he thinks only the Trump administration should be allowed to do that.

"She says she voted for Trump for religious reasons"

#5 | Posted by Zed

What religion would want you to vote for a pedophile?

Oh, never mind... she must be a Christian.

Release The voter Files!
Who are you trying to protect?!

#6 | Posted by john_savage2

The voters.

I expect this to be inherited by the next president.

#4 | Posted by sitzkrieg

Of course. Conservatives are too cowardly to actually finish a war. Instead they continue to throw money and lives at it to pay for their cowardice. Only Democrats are brave enough and have the moral fortitude to end a war. The Iraq war was ended by Obama. Afghanistan was ended by Biden. And Conservatives continue to attack them for ending them (especially Biden), attacking them for what conservatives were too cowardly to do themselves.

I would have figured MAGATS would be turning out in huge support for Vivek's giving voice to a sex abuse enabler. I mean anyone who has voted for Trump has done the same thing Ramaswamy did with this ad.

#4 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce

They probably will. He will get his 30%, the Republican base will be thrilled about this and eager to vote for him.

But 30% doesn't win an election.

I'd bet when all is said and done, less than half of those accused actually cast an illegal vote.

#12 | Posted by Danforth

I would not be surprised if none of them did. They make a huge deal out of mistakes on voter rolls, because conservatives are ignorant and don't know how voting actually works, assume that if ineligible people are on the rolls that means they could be voting and there is no way for anyone to know. (for you ignorant conservatives, every vote is tracked, you can see look back and see every election that each person has ever voted in)

When it is actually looked at properly, there turns out to be almost no cases of ineligible voters actually voting. And when it does happen it almost always is someone who is confused and thought they were eligible. Or a Republican who thinks they should do it, and that they won't get caught, because they are ignorant and think it cannot be traced, or believe the people profiting off their outrage who lie to them saying Democrats are doing it and getting away with it.

That's exactly what needs to happen.
The best available hackers working for the good guys need to be given the task of breaking into any online technology that could alter election results.
#24 | Posted by BillJohnson

So are the "good guys" the ones who are doing it in secret, and also banned from disclosing it to the manufacturer (disclosing it to the manufacturer so they can fix it is the widely accepted correct course if action for a white hat hacker)?

Because they are acting A LOT (or even exactly) how "bad guys" are expected to and generally act.

Can any of you raetards use the attached article to prove Trump had a conspiracy, between multiple people, to use this voting machine to cheat in the upcoming election?
Anyone? Or is it the usual hair-on-fire, retarded -------- we see daily?

#12 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Why would he need to acquire it in secret? It is not like they can do over the air updates to patch any holes before they are found. Why not have a big event... "We got a voting machine and we are going to have a team check for any security flaws." Good publicity.

The only reason I could see why they would want to keep it secret was if they were not trying to find the flaws to fix them and SECURE the election, but instead wanted to USE them to try to steal the election.

But I am happy to entertain your explanation of any reasons why they would feel the need to do this in secret that are not to try to use any exploits they find for their own personal gain.

I want say there's no way the world lets Iran overturn the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea... but I don't really believe it anymore.

#23 | Posted by sitzkrieg

Before Trump they would not have. But they do not want to get forced into Trump's war of choice.

They could either let Trump manipulate them into getting sucked into the quagmire in Iran, letting him force the rest of the world to do his dirty work, or they could let go of the Law of the Sea.

So the Law of the Sea is now no more.

Good job Republicans. You built that.

The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of... elementary school children.

It is really hard not to say "I told you so" when we literally told them so.

Trump might pull a Nixon and resign before he gets impeached. Then we'll be stuck with Peter Thiel's boy toy, J.D. Vance. Not good but at least manageable with a Democrat controlled Congress.

#12 | Posted by Twinpac

Trump won't resign. If Trump resigns he would get called before Congress to testify about the Epstein files within a week. Republicans made it clear that former presidents are fair game (Bill Clinton was called to testify about Epstein in front of Congress).

Trump will stay in office as long as he possibly can, because him being a sitting President is the only thing keeping him from being compelled to testify about his relationship with Epstein.

Remember when MAGA loved to insult people by calling them pedophiles?
Now they elevate them to public office.
#5 | Posted by Zed

They accuse others of pedophilia because they can relate to it. They would do it if they could (or are already and haven't gotten caught), so they assume other people must be as well.

Just like voter fraud.

If you want to know what terrible things Conservatives are doing, just look at what they accuse others of. They are telling you what they are doing themselves.

The Libertarian party was taken over by MAGA Republicans (they called themselves the Mises caucus). And they have basically destroyed it.

Last election cycle they had Trump speak at their national convention, if that gives you an idea of how complete it was.

So this is basically a MAGA Republican puppet calling for assassinating Democrats. Actual Libertarians calling for the assassination of public officials would surprise me. I don't think MAGA Republicans calling for the assassination of Democrats would surprise anyone.

It is much more terrifying that pedophiles and rapists run our executive branch.

Since the biggest indicator a government is Marxist/communist is the government owning the means of production, does this mean that Trump is going to reverse his policy of the US government taking ownership stakes in US companies (Intel, US Steel, IBM, Lithium Americas, etc)?

Also, why do you assume that all illegal votes end up being discovered especially on states where those in power don't want illegal votes to be discovered?
#10 | Posted by BellRinger

Where do you think the votes are coming from? Voter history rolls are public record. They have a history of every vote that was cast in the election.

Every ballot cast has to have a corresponding person on the voter rolls that now shows as having voted. Otherwise the number of cast ballots would be more than the number of people shown as having voted. If that were the case, it would be pretty easy for you to show evidence of it. So show me the evidence.

There are other possibilities as well. Ineligible voters being on the rolls... and THEN CASTING A VOTE. But that is also easy to prove. Find a person on the rolls who was ineligible, and then show that they voted from their history.

The last I can think of is an ineligible person impersonating someone who did not vote. But you should be able to find people on the rolls who show as having voted, but did not actually vote. Again, that should be pretty easy to find. And you would likely have a bunch of people who got flagged for trying to vote twice, because how would the fraudsters know who to impersonate?

So please share your evidence of fraud or your theories (based upon how voting, voter rolls, and public information work) of how the fraud could be committed without it being pretty easily uncovered by citizen journalists, much less the political party that has a vested interest in uncovering fraud.

Like accidentally bombing civilians instead of military facilities.

#13 | Posted by horstngraben

Does bombing an elementary school count?

Does that make the US responsible to the Iran war in MAGA world, or do they just pretend it did not happen?

Play stupid games... win stupid prizes.