So, are you willing to go ahead and say that he has, and probably will continue to, pressured the FDA to push the vaccine out quicker, and declare that "[you] won't take the vaccine". Or are you going to jump through some convoluted mental gymnastics to say that this isn't ACTUALLY pressure, and really he was just trolling liberals, and that ultimately everything Trump does that is immoral or unethical is Obama's fault so you still think that Trump is the reborn messiah and will believe every word that comes out of his mouth (including words that claim that the vaccine is safe and that it was not rushed)?
#22 | POSTED BY GTBRITISHSKULL AT 2020-09-08 01:59 PM
There's a big difference between pressure to accelerate a process that's inherently long and accelerating a process for political reasons that could be unsafe.
#24 | POSTED BY ROCKY_B
Lol... looks like you decided firmly on Option B. Just don't throw your back out doing all those gymnastics.
For example, how do you justify claiming he is just trying to "accelerate a process" when HIS WORDS are "The deep state, or whoever, over at the FDA is ... Obviously, they are hoping to delay the answer until after November 3rd."
HE has stated that the timing matters to him for political reasons AND has already claimed that his opponents are DELAYING the vaccine for said political reasons (you notice... NOT because it is "a process that's inherently long").
YOU Sir, are a sycophant. Because instead of addressing the words that CAME OUT OF TRUMP'S MOUTH, you vomit out a word salad of obfuscation and FUD. And by arguing "Trump is not doing that because I think it would be stupid". Despite the fact that YOU are apparently the stupid one because your reasons for thinking it is stupid are wrong, but also that just because doing something would be stupid DOES NOT MEAN THAT A PERSON DID NOT OR WILL NOT DO IT.
You know another thing that would be theoretically make Trump "toast" if he did it and that "wouldn't help him"? Downplaying a pandemic even though there were TONS of people telling him that it was going to be bad, and thereby letting hundreds of thousands of Americans die. But, somehow, people like YOU don't, after the fact, think that something so OBVIOUSLY stupid for him to do should now make him "toast". I don't see you calling for his impeachment. So, it makes your whole argument moot. Because you are living proof that as long as Trump has his sycophants, it doesn't matter what bad thing he does, he will never be "toast" because he can rely on the weak will of the conservatives to protect him.