Ghislaine Maxwell never saw Trump in any inappropriate setting', interview transcript shows
#3 | Posted by LampLighter

That statement is worth about as much as $3 bill.

The DoJ has also said she has engaged in a "significant pattern of dishonest conduct" and is willing to "brazenly lie under oath."

You know from my posts I would NOT defend sex trafficking or abusing minors.
1. What would be the impact on international relations if powerful people in other countries were exposed?

#124 | Posted by BillJohnson

Protecting those people who engage in sex trafficking is defending sex trafficking.

You are literally defending sex trafficking while you claim you would not do that
You regularly support Trump who we already know is a sex abuser
You may as well just fully admit you are fine with trafficking, abuse and pedo's because it's clear that you are

Trix? I believe that is what Epstein called the encounters Trump had with the underage girls at his house. He had them turning trix.

#2 - yes but to acknowledge so would require some self-reflection. Doing that gets you gets kicked out of the cult.

Interesting that MAGATS are ignoring one. I thought they opposed the weaponization of the DoJ.

"Releasing the Epstein files without redactions could pose a national security risk." - Mike Johnson
#16 | Posted by BillJohnson

Johnson says it "could pose" a threat while he ignores the very real security threat created by Trump's murder of people who Trump, a person who recently falsely claimed the US Gov has paid Obama $40M in royalties, has unilaterally decided are smuggling drugs.
The biggest security threat to the nation that MJ should be concerned about is the felonious rapist sitting in the Oval Office who already tried to overthrow the Constitution.

Loomer didn't bother to mention her special friend Donald Trump's own associations with Nazis such as his decision to defend Tucker Carlson's decision to give white supremacist Nick Fuentes a platform from which to spread his hate or when he called white nationalists in Charlottesville "very good people."

Saw this coming

"Option 3:
Support release of the files while having the DoJ open a new investigation that blocks the release of a portion of the files (anything that makes Trump or other republicans looks bad) and then spin the rest of it in an attempt to hurt democrats.
Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2025-11-17 01:50 PM "

Prosecutors cannot be allowed to continue to practice after bypassing a grand jury and lying to the court. Halligan should be disbarred and prosecuted.

Trump should step in and pardon since he established there's nothing wrong with public corruption with his commutations/pardons for George Santos, Duncan Hunter, Steve Stockman, Rick Renzi, Rod Blagojevich, Duke Cunningham to name a few.

This story was dead until Trump and idiot Bondi revived it. Then they tried to bury it. Again. I have zero sympathy for such incompetence.
#150 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-11-19 01:35 AM | Reply

This was never a dead story because people like Bongino, Patel and even Vance and Trump to a lesser extent actively kept it alive during the Biden years. Once they obtained power over the investigation they could have allowed SDNY to continue their investigation into Epstein's coconspirators but they decided to prematurely close the investigation which meant they could no longer hide behind it being an active investigation.
It should be no surprise that the public now expects them to do what they said they would do and provide answers to questions such as this one taken from 2021 tweet from JD Vance, "What possible interest would the US government have in keeping Epstein's clients secret?" Most of the people in the country expect the government to do what Patel said in 2023 and "roll out the black book" to "let us know who the pedophiles are."

Democrats are the party of law and order?
You must be hitting the bong hard tonight to be off in that fantasy.
#141 | Posted by BillJohnson

Do you support all felons or just Trump?

Dem Rep About to Be Censured for Texting with Epstein
Posted by boaz

Swing and a miss

It means that once the paperwork is sent from the House to the Senate, the bill will be sent straight to Trump, who has vowed to sign it into law.
#26 | Posted by LampLighter

Trump could save the government some time and money and just order the release. He's clearly playing a game here. He's going to do whatever he can to continue giving cover to himself and others in those files.

Rep. Clay Higgins is the one House member who voted to protect sex traffickers.

I only hire the best people - Donald Trump

Most corrupt administration in US history.

But it's the progressives hated of Trump that's pushing this, and I fear there's nothing there, which is going to piss progressives off even more.
#34 | Posted by boaz

You are telling us that the following people are progressives?

"Seriously, we need to release the Epstein list. That is an important thing." - JD Vance Oct 2024
"Everything's going to come out to the public" - Pam Bondi Mar 2025
""Been calling for ALL of it to be released so the public can have accountability- we must find out who pedo'd around with Epstein: Barr totally failed" - Kash Patel Dec 2023
""it's time for accountability ... to hide lists ... protect political friends ... we don't have time for that." - Alina Habba, Feb 2025"
"What the hell are they hiding with Jeffrey Epstein? ... What do Clinton, Obama officials, big money leftists, a former Prime Minister of Israel " why do they want to make this Jeffrey Epstein story go away so bad?" - Dan Bongino May 2023

He had two choices:
1) Take an ego hit when they vote against him, or
2) Pretend it was his wish all along.

#7 | Posted by REDIAL

Option 3:
Support release of the files while having the DoJ open a new investigation that blocks the release of a portion of the files (anything that makes Trump or other republicans looks bad) and then spin the rest of it in an attempt to hurt democrats.

Epstein taco?

It's not like there's anyone left who doesn't already know the Trump administration is inherently racist.

Remember how the GOP spent years investigating Biden's business connections and found nothing? Here we have Noem passing government to herself and we get nothing but silence and deflections from that same GOP.

The investigation was closed just a few months ago by the Bondi led DoJ. Sounds like Trump is saying he feels the investigation is not complete and is calling Bondi's competence into question.
I agree that she is incompetent. He should fire her and replace her with someone who is actually qualified for the job.

who's left to discover?
#7 | Posted by eberly

Release the files and let us find out.

IF the DOJ had the goods on Gaetz, they would have prosecuted/sentenced him.
#3 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

Were you laughing when you typed that? They have a recording of Tom Holman accepting a bribe and are doing nothing about it.