hey support stinky's war. They just do not want to go on the record of supporting stinky's war.
They're cowards.
#27 | Posted by Nixon

They support the idea of it but I don't believe they support it at this time being carried out by this president and this secdef after they've seen how they've been flailing about since the start. If we had clear goals and were actually achieving them then I have no doubt they would have passed an AUMF already.

Is 'pausing' now going to be a new word for 'capitulation'...
OCU
#22 | Posted by OCUser

Newsmax seems to think so. You know Trump is in trouble when they are even calling him out on his bs.

The Trump administration is using ICE to murder Americans on our own streets and is carrying out murders in international waters and expects the world to take the word of this lying White House that they are running drugs (as if that is justification for murder).

I'm not saying I support political violence. I'm just saying MAGATS look like the disingenuous --------- that they are when they fake surprise after people push back against murderous fascists.

"Don't take your guns to town" - Johnny Cash

"Members of the 316th Security Forces Squadron were responding to a domestic incident when they went into the wrong unit of a duplex on base while armed"

We hear about cops doing this nearly every day and rarely do they ever face punishment. I'm glad the Air Force is taking it seriously but it's time for the entire nation to stand up to incompetent law enforcement.

I've never cared for Cornyn but Paxton is truly vile.
#18 | Posted by BellRinger

Has that ever stopped you from supporting a Republican candidate before? Are you telling us you'd vote for Talarico?

Trump has not had a plan or goals for attacking Iran since Day 1. He is not "pausing" because of some deal with Iran that isn't going to happen. He's pausing because at this point continuing offensives strikes against Iran requires congressional approval under the War Powers Resolution. The fact that republicans in Congress continue to block holding an AUMF vote is a clear message that they do not support Trump's big Epstein distraction but don't have the balls to actually put their opposition on record. They'd rather just have Democrats force enforcement of the 60 day limit. Even those like Graham who have strongly supported the war in their public statements appear to recognize that Trump and Hegseth are not fit to prosecute this war. Allowing it to continue through the summer will lead to an even bigger electoral disaster for Republicans come November than the one they are already facing.

Everything he does is corrupt.

Nothing less than full legalization of child sex abuse will satisfy the MAGA crowd.

Maul has been fantastic.

He does this to prove that he's not cheating.
#1 | Posted by Zed

Or perhaps his wife is into it. Both Jennifer and Pete have a well documented history of extra-marital relations. This type of behavior seems to be pervasive with Trump's circle. He has a history of sleeping around and Melania doesn't seem to care. Then there was whatever has been going on with Noem, her husband, Lewindowski and her "blanket" . Chavez-DeRemer is said to have been sleeping with a member of her security detail. Female staffers at Dept of Labor were told to "pay attention" to her husband and father who both ended banned from Labor Dept facilities due to sexual harassment of staffers. I could go on. There's Kennedy, Musk, let's not forget he wanted Matt Gaetz as AG. I'm sure there are plenty of others.
Has anyone checked the front door of the White House to see if it has an upside-down pineapple?

Her testimony would be useless. Any defense attorney would point to the DoJ's own characterization of Maxwell that she is a "pervasive" and "brazen" liar should she ever offer testimony in any future cases.
Congressional GOP members know this. Any of them suggesting trading her release for cooperation is only doing so in order to protect those involved with Epstein/Maxwell/Trump's trafficking ring.

The lone star tick has been engineered to produce an enhanced protein to create a red meat food allergy.
#30 | Posted by visitor

Alpha Gal isn't a protein and it's not produced by ticks. If you are going to make up conspiracies at least get the basics correct, idiot.

Those people are called Vegans. Nobody serious takes them seriously.

#26 | Posted by morris

I've been a vegan for about 25 years. Can confirm.

#23 I don't expect a serious response. All that account does is lie

Remember when MAGATS where all up in arms about the price of eggs heading into the 2024 elections? Why are they not applying that same line of thinking to beef now? Is it because they are part of a cult that will kick them out?

I thought some n the left want to ban beef.

#8 | Posted by BellRinger

Why don't you post the names of some of the left wing leaders who have stated they want to ban beef? Or is that just another one of your lies?

It doesn't matter. Is not like the GOP in Congress will actually do anything about it

The Republicans in the Senate will still rubber-stamp whatever unqualified cult member Trump taps for AG just like they did when Mullin replaced Noem.

Another round of tax cuts for the 1% would surely eliminate the debt. I mean, it can't possibly fail every single time they try it, right?

wouldn't i meant...obviously.

I would trust a US government agency if I were anthropic either.

Trump should give him a preemptive pardon as a thanks for distracting from his disastrous Iran policy and Epstein.

Should be facing a murder charge but the federal government is hiding evidence from investigators.

It is now facing federal charges of fraud, accused of funneling millions into some of those very same hate groups.
Posted by BellRinger

LOL. Are these charges being brought by the same organization that failed to indict Letitia James multiple times? If you read the indictment you find the government never accuses SLPC of encouraging their informants to "manufacture racism" as Todd Blanche claimed. Makes me wonder if Blanche "even looked at the indictments." What the indictment does say is that one informant provided SPLC with documents taken from the Neo-Nazi National Alliance that the SPLC used to expose the group's violent activities.

The Trump admin is just mad because SPLC has exposed Trump and many of his associates and cabinet members close associations with white nationalist groups.

This case will quickly fall apart just like so many of the other politically motivated prosecutions that have been carried out by the Trump DOJ. When that happens the MAGATS on this site will ignore that it ever happened while they move on to cheerleading for whatever future retribution cases the administration attempts.