I'm not going to defend slavery...
#5 | Posted by BillJohnson
You wrote that as the follow up sentence to one you wrote defending a slaver who raped his slaves, broke apart their families and subjected them to involuntary medical experimentation.
"From what I've read he took much better care of them than many others." Also Billjohnson
Records from the time are incomplete but Jefferson was perhaps the most prolific slaver alive at the founding of the US. The Declaration of Independence was a complete contradiction to how he lived his own life. It's not like the thought never occurred to Jefferson that slavery was abhorrent. His original draft of the Declaration called slavery the "cruel war against human nature."
Ben Franklin freed his slaves before the revolutionary war ended. Not Jefferson though. The reason slavery is mentioned so often at Monticello is because Monticello could not have existed without slavery. It was built and maintained by slaves. Slaves did the cooking, maintenance and agricultural work. Slaves played a bigger role in the existence of Monticello than Jefferson ever did. It may still exist today only because, unlike Washington who freed his slaves upon his death, Jefferson's slaves were sold to cover his debts.
"we now know microcoagulation and embolism is a significant injury that's associated with the mRNA vaccines"
That is a lie.
"Large population studies and reviews by health agencies find no causal link between mRNA vaccines (such as Pfizer and Moderna) and venous thromboembolism or pulmonary embolism."
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
It is the vector based, not mrna, AstraZeneca that was found to be associated with increased risk of thrombosis
www.science.org