This guy might get less sympathy but it's still murder.

#33 | POSTED BY EBERLY

The only people who will care about this are those looking for reasons to engage in character assassination or smears as a means to discredit him and justify the shooting.

We voted to remove 100% of illegals.

#9 | Posted by visitor_

You have no idea what you voted for.

Mostly because you're stupid.

But also because Trump and his inner circle weren't honest about their intentions and plans.

Sentinel is an emotional bitch...

#18 | Posted by lfthndthrds

No, you're just unAmerican s*&^.

They aren't going to accept any invitation from you to the "normals clubhouse". They'd rather spit in your face.
They might regret their Trump vote but it doesn't go any further than that.

Which is why this is never going away.

Those folks will continue to vote for whatever candidate is most spiteful to the rest of us. That's really their only goal at this point.

When is MAGA going to final acknowledge that everything they believed is a lie?

They're spending spending spending while gutting services and agencies that conduct critical jobs.

We're getting the worst possible outcome of increased spending but little to nothing for it. Do we even know where the tariff money is?

Oh look, our favorite "liberal" strikes again with a s*&^storm so intense it's a farking turd blizzard.

FTA:

Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O'Hara stated publicly that, in 2025, the Minneapolis Police Department recovered roughly 900 guns from the street and arrested hundreds of violent offenders " and did not kill a single person.

Let that sit with you.

If the Minneapolis Police Department didn't kill anyone in a year of active policing, and my combat unit didn't kill anyone in over a year of war, Minnesotans are right to ask why ICE and the Border Patrol have killed two people here in two weeks.

The answer is uncomfortable but unavoidable. Either this is their mission " or they are operating outside accountability.

Answer is both.

This is their mission and they're being allowed to execute it without fear of repercussions or consequences from DoJ or other law enforcement.

From the Times' comments section: "The best line I've heard so far: 'If they showed it on an airplane, viewers would still walk out.'"

What do these people expect? Did they really expect a documentary on a nude model/sex worker gold digger turned First Lady with zero accomplishments other than a few plagiarism scandals to be of interest to people struggling to put food on the table and keep the roof over their heads?

She's a wholly unremarkable person given the massive opportunities she's been afforded to be something special.

Remember kids, this is about Law and Order!

The not fascist fascists have to utterly and completely violate the Constitution in order to save it!

Wait until the FBI raids more state election offices to steal election materials and records it has no business being in possession of.

How can it be too late, when Nunn is the first time the Second Amendment was tested?

#45 | Posted by snoofy

The answer is in the post you quoted.

Oneirondumbf*&^ is just a lying s*&^ stirring piece of foreign agitating s*&^.

Why?

Please explain.

thx..

#17 | Posted by LampLighter

Because Truthhurts gets under his and ballwasher's skin so they try to pick on him together thinking it'll change the facts of the situation.

Define execution?

#4 | Posted by oneironaut

Shot in the back while blind and on your hands and knees.

#1 | Posted by oneironaut

Too bad ICE doesn't drag you out of your house in your underwear and a blanket before shipping your worthless sack of s*&^ a&& back to China.

Hey dumbf*&^, how is it those agents managed not to shoot him?

F*&^ off you stupid piece of s*&^.

Still not an argument... not even a denial. More like a bending over.

#226 | Posted by Corky

Says the guy who compulsively defends his Bronze Age sky daddy with a bunch of circular reasoned preconceived conclusions supported by back filled "evidence."

What's the "other option"?

There's some technical/engineering aspects to it, just not as much for me. Building guns can be an expensive hobby and given the pressures/forces involved, a potentially dangerous one.

Curious how the Bruen standard feels about that. Because it's not legal for any state to outright deny concealed carry in 2026.

#41 | Posted by snoofy

Because Nunn is too late historically for the Bruen test.

Its requirements are for regulations contemporaneous with the drafting of the Constitution or earlier, ie English Common Law.

Weirder than the current reality of maga maroon Republicans throwing the 2nd amendment under the bus?
I hesitate to say that it can't get any weirder than that.

I figured this is how it would play out. IMO it would have been weirder if they had broken from Trump.

In any case, there's tons of memes and cartoons going around now highlighting the plethora of armed protests from right wingers in years past as they clutch their pearls and get the vapors over one dude carrying legally.

You just don't like the Retorts you get to your conceited, supposedly superior worldview, where everyone else's worldview is a, 'myth'.
Perhaps you should do a study on other people's worldviews... naw. Never mind.
#221 | Posted by Corky

Still shadowboxing in that pompous little mind...

It works. I don't have to understand it.

#205 | Posted by Corky

Yawn. I don't think I've ever seen someone so insecure in their faith yet trying so desperately hard to convince others and themselves it's true...

Having said that, it was less vi9lent then slamming a subway sandwich into the face of an ICE agent.

Of course, this limp wrist couldn't help himself. He had to downplay and uplay the narrative he doesn't even realize he's programmed to chirp.

Only suppressors and IR lasers would be common in "gun nut crowd" only.

I don't disagree with the rest. Militarization of police is a huge problem and has been for decades.

No doubt, they'll find "something" that they'll blow out of proportion and act like warrants federal control over state and local elections while election law experts cry foul and begin explaining is not warranted and is a massive constitutional overreach/violation for the federal government.

Then expect this to happen in other large blue areas of swing states that tend to be the tipping point of who wins or loses the states.

Sounds like you think your opinions are facts, and other people's opinions are, 'myths'. And I didn't derail anything.

#181 | Posted by Corky

Sounds like you're operating on at least a few assumptions.

If that was me ... Sorry for derailing the thread.
Sometimes I just can't help myself when it comes to absurdity of some religions and especially when a Fake Plastic Christian attempts to use it to justify stupid and immoral behaviors.

#182 | Posted by donnerboy

Nah. I think the combo of Bill who just draws the comments and Corky who has to defend Christianity at all costs was inevitably going to be shoveling sand against a King tide.