You are wound WAY too tight.

Hey s*&^bag, the guy you voted for is burning the whole world down and you think people want to joke about politics with you?

Get some f*&^ing self-awareness.

Harris was and remains an abysmal candidate, JPW. Just deal with it.

Deal with what? A position I held and expressed here many times?

Here's the key, though, she wasn't as bad as Trump. And that's not a hindsight 20/20 statement. It was known Trump would be awful and dips*&^s like you voted for him anyway.

You only seeing one war at a time, one dimension, this why you're called Gaslighter.

#6 | Posted by oneironaut

Onelumpofs*&^ thinks he's got it all figured out.

He then boasted that the U.S. is well-stocked with "vast amounts of ammunition" and that defense companies such as Lockheed Martin and Raytheon are "building at a level they've never seen before."

Pure unadulterated bulls*&^.

We're being "lead" by someone who isn't told the truth because his ego has to live in a contrived fantasy.

And he's surrounded by incompetent tool bags more than happy to keep the delusion alive for their own benefits.

There is no winning this.

Even if we "win," it will spart years of terrorism and asymmetrical reprisals both at home and on any American found abroad.

Only ballwasher would make the argument he's making.

Gotta keep up the delusion that Trump isn't an unmitigated disaster that he helped usher in because he though Harris would be "worse."

(BTW only an abysmally stupid pile of s*&^ could say that with a straight face before the election, even less so now)

You're not seriously expecting shrimpd*&^ to understand basic numbers and math, are you?

Until we stop their attacks on their neighbors, we need to stop their export of oil. ALL of it. They're slowly disintegrating as it is.

#5 | Posted by rf4b

That will escalate from regional to global conflict as China steps in to preserve their oil supply and Russia joins them as an opportunity to further push the implosion of US power.

The trucker thing is never a "pretty good zinger." It never was and never will be, sport.

That one was doubly stupid because shorthand would mean it was a full message but with...wait for it...shorter sentences using abbreviations.

Was it that?

The entire government apparatus has been converted into a money-making scheme.

Stupid sack of s*&^ chimes in with gay fantasies even when nobody has addressed him.

I love it how these s*&^bags think this shtick fools anyone.

May?

It is.

We're seeing it before our very eyes in real time.

We're already capitulating, it's just not acknowledged as such.

It wasn't even close. Cope.

You're such a stupid f*&^.

A historically illiterate, math challenged, brainless piece of s*&^ who only survived until adulthood because society allowed you to.

BTW that's how reality works for people able to look at data and draw solid conclusions. Not everyone needs to be spoon fed obvious conclusions like you do.

Does anyone here speak gibberish? I'd like a translation.

#24 | Posted by BellRinger

Proving that you are, in fact, stupid.

criminal neglect

#21 | Posted by truthhurts

No, I think it's just becoming clear that we've been more akin to Putin's Russia for far longer than we want to admit. DoD budget has been little more than a conduit from the treasury to insider pockets.

We are looking at multiple trillions at a minimum

#20 | Posted by truthhurts

No, we're looking at the collapse of the dollar.

Congrats Trumper dumbf*&^s, you're killing the goose that laid the golden eggs.

That must be truck stop shorthand he's posting.

#25 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Duhhhhh TrUkCsTopSZ!!

Another useless, stupid f*&^ chimes in.

And of course, s*&^bag ballwasher has nothing to say other than deflecting.

GFY you piece of s*&^. Maybe you should acknowledge that stupid dumbf*&^s like you are why we're in this situation to begin with and then kindly STFU because what you "think" is not needed nor relevant.

The total cost of Afghanistan was $2.3 trillion.

They need 10% of a 20 year war for one year?

Even some of abortions biggest supporters on the left who are legal scholars have admitted that roe was poorly adjudicated. You using " mysoginistic" is just playing the victim card.

#25 | Posted by BellRinger

You used a logical fallacy to avoid addressing the point, dips*&^.

"Even some of" means nothing.

#65 | Posted by Danforth

Could you imagine the response if Biden had purged military brass to install cronies? Then invaded a neighbor and kidnapped their President and months later began another ME war that even the crony brass suggested was a bad idea and resulted in the head of counterterrorism to resign with a letter specifically calling out the new ME war as the reason? The mildest caterwauling would be for impeachment and the most extreme and loud would be for violence to "take our country back" with quotations from The Declaration of Independence as a rationale.

Or better yet, imagine Biden or Obama were named thousands of times in the papers surrounding multiple federal and state level investigations into a pedophile/drug dealing organization only to have them disappear the investigations when getting into office and placing multiple people named in said investigations into positions of power to squelch any further advancement or mention of them?

Or Obama/Biden launching a meme coin or crypto ventures the day before their inauguration that has then gone through multiple pump and dump cycles making Obama/Biden billions of dollars?

Or Obama/Biden wearing campaign merch to a Dignified Transfer ceremony? Checking the time was an indication of Biden clearly hating the military, but hocking merch is what, pure patriotism?

Or Obama/Biden enacting a fake assassination scheme complete with proper flag placement, photographer placement (by staff, not happenstance) and multiple bystander deaths?

Or Obama/Biden starting a war from an empty room of a gaudy resort with multiple security breaches/risks then spending the entire weekend golfing and only flippantly addressing servicemember deaths while making light of more to come?

I feel like we need to make a permanent thread on the back page with these things added in real time as I'm sure there are dozens of instances, I've missed that have already happened and there are certain to be dozens, if not hundreds, more instances to come.

The voters clearly saw it differently.

#66 | Posted by BellRinger

His vote count went up by something like 3 million votes. Otherwise, it was the usual group of idiots who support Trump no matter what.

3 million is hardly "the voters." If anything, "the voters" abstained from voting for either candidate, indicating the statement "there is no metric by which trump was a better option than harris" to be correct.

They rejected both.

Looking at Trump, vapid is clearly not a disqualifier. What's your (R)eal (R)eason?

There's probably several dozen attributes that could be on that list where they're pearl clutching, hyperventilation worthy no gos for a Dem but a mere "meh" for Trump.