The Dems gave the Rs a gift wrapped political landscape. Trump took that to mean a complete mandate, and is taking legitimate concerns like illegal immigration and drug trade and fumbling it epically. The political pendulum is going to swing back quickly.

The only thing that changed with this is that the cap on the loans for these fields went down. The numbers they lowered to supposedly cover about 95% of those applying still.

I don't think that anyone has argued against federally guaranteed loans as being as source of tuitions skyrocketing... So why now is it a bad thing to cap the limit at a point that covers almost everyone who needs them, and removes room for artificial inflation?

I wonder if the usual crowd here will expect the thread count here to be 100% about the next president, and not about Trump. Especially if wrong doing, or further incompetence is uncovered after he is out of office. It's laughable to consider Joe Biden's presidency off limits for examination. We should hold previous admins to account just as much as we do current ones. That whole learn from the past or be doomed to repeat it thing.

Any other previous President that had autopen usage numbers jump to the numbers Biden's seemingly did, especially with the concern of cognitive decline that pushed him off the ticket, would be headline news as should be. Now, because we treat politics more than ever like a team sport everyone here needs incontrovertible evidence of 100% guilt to even entertain if it should maaaayyyybe be looked into or even discussed along side the current cluster ---- administration.

The Main Stream Media is not happy with that acronym I'm sure

yes of course, the past decades of immigration and the situation we are in now is all caused by the issue you point out. Do you ever discuss a topic genuinely?

Then they'll have no problem immigrating legally, but you seem to think they shouldn't have to do it the right way, why?

I said we need them to be beneficial to the culture, not that we need them for slave labor wage jobs.

#70 Given I've stated ad nauseam they are all corrupt and need to go... exactly who am I going to shed a tear for?

Not an R, but I'll still comment on here, I'm glad to see the corruption is being investigated regardless of who it brings down.

"People have freedom in this country"

Which having standards of who we allow to immigrate exist, and why illegal immigration is not beneficial to the culture of our country.

really? for the left asking people to meld into the common culture, expanding it as they do, is too much?

I wonder if he wipes the watch with a cloth

You've still offered vagaries about what they are supposed to do... they have a ton of stores, any can have a raid at any time... theyre not going to be able to stop them accept in your fever dream

You're dreaming if you think some HD worker is going to interrupt a raid in progress and they'll just turn around and leave

Store managers...hahahahahaha... that's ------- rich

exactly, so you want HD employees, hourly workers, who are not informed about a raid to race outside and confront Federal officials and challenge them on what their probable cause is? That's what you're proposing HD is supposed to be doing?

"What have they done to support condone or allow illegal warranties arrests on their property?"

What has HD done? the parking lot is not while Private Property they are treated more like public property for warrant enforcement... so exactly what is HD, specifically the workers who'd be tasked with it, supposed to do?

"A police officer generally does not need a warrant to arrest someone in a parking lot if they have probable cause to believe a crime has been committed. Probable cause means the officer has enough trustworthy facts to believe that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime. Parking lots are considered public places where a warrant is not required for an arrest."

Now Joe hourly is supposed to go debate with ICE if they have probable cause or not? gtfoh

If these protestors went and set up shop in HD parking lots and did what they are advocating hourly workers do they'd be more effective. But they don't want to do that, it's not performative enough.

Coke and Pepsi are billion dollar companies too, what political pressure have they applied? GET THE BOYCOTT GOING!!!! McD and BK you're next!!!!

What is HD to allow or support it? Not what are they doing to oppose, what are they doing to support it?

So you don't know either.

Probably not a thing...

If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.
--Desmond Tutu.

"Home Depot officials have stated they are not involved in these operations, do not cooperate with agents, and are not given advance notice of raids. The incidents often involve day laborers in the public spaces of parking lots, which ICE can access without a warrant. Home Depot logs these incidents internally for tracking purposes, similar to shoplifting events. "

Given that they have no notice, and cannot legally prevent an arrest in the parking lot, what EXACTLY should they be doing? Remember too this will be happening unscripted in the moment, so what is some hourly Joe supposed to do? And when he's hurt or arrested are the immigrants rights groups that are calling for the boycotts going to step in and make them whole again?

Why aren't these protesters patrolling the parking lots, and engaging ICE themselves when this happens rather than standing in line buying and returning putty knifes in a futile gesture instead? The left always says well at least it 'something' even if it actively doesn't help or even hurts a situation.

Now answer the rest of that sentence... shouldnt the left be boycotting everywhere? What has Coke or Pepsi done to stop this?

#12 if you expect home depot to be taking actions or you'll protest... exactly what actions do you propose they tell their employees to do? Exactly how does Josh's from the lumber department job description fit into "stand off with armed federal agents"? No, what most of these idiots protesting think is that HD is complicit and they're not. But facts never let a liberal stop letting their feelings dictate their actions.

And if being neutral on the topic is what gets you boycotted, why aren't they boycotting just about all businesses? Why not Lowes? If anything it's been because HD was more than willing to allow a bunch of illegals to loiter on their property and shill for under the table work. What'd that get them, turned on by the left. Which is classic left behavior... pass the purity test, or be sacrificed.