At this point I couldn't care less as let the loser of society kill themselves off.

Tuens out the new Pope is a conservative so the libs can go back to hating the Catholic Church again.

THEY all signed a fiscal contract and by law are required to pay. It is not for we taxpayers to pay for their debts.

Let's see... Oh, departed RVN in 71, PCS to NSA, Ft Meade MD.

Illegal labor, the one class of people the dems care not that they do not even get minimum wage.

Hopefully a nonsocialist.

I see no problem as they are no taking about selling off national parks.

The U.S. federal government owns and manages roughly 640 million acres of land, which represents about 28% of the total land area in the country. Approximately 95% of this land is managed by four major federal agencies: the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the Forest Service (FS), the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), and the National Park Service (NPS).

Why does the federal government need 28% of our landmass?

FYI: "Over four years, the Biden administration protected more lands and waters"674 million acres"than any other president in history".

Only dems would be for a larger IRS, but the Again I suspect many of those seems have a low income where they do not have to pay federal income taxes, so no skin in the game.

Guess laws against murder didn't work....

$2.39/.49 here in LA.

Really.
Which organization of 500 people did you cut 50 workers from, with no impact on productivity?
It's so amazingly obvious when you lie.

#10 | POSTED BY SNOOFY AT 2025-05-06 10:30 AM | FLAG: Actually Musk cut about 80%o Twitter staff [now 'X'] and the site is functioning well. Too many private companies, like govt over time end up with a bloated bureaucracy and if you follow business news you see when a company is 'on the ropes' fiscally, the structure down, eliminating positions and letting employees go to get lean and mean to be able to compete.

Just another reminder when the dem party's polls are in hte toilet:

#43 | POSTED BY C0RI0LANUS AT 2025-05-02 04:11 PM | FLAG: Well, one can demand that NASA go back to doing their initial job -- just understand that it will cost the American taxpayer [are you one?] more...

More Winning!

How does it benefit us that the United States is surrendering our leadership role in the global high-tech economy?

How is that good?

#22 | POSTED BY SNOOFY AT 2025-05-02 03:01 PM | FLAG: As long os our private economy hi tech companies continue to innovate, as well as new ones being formed that is not a problem except in your mind.

Hum, as I am sure that many of those actual women in competition are most likely applaudingTrump...as they realize the dems were against them., Dems - their own worst enemy.

Within Trump's first 100 days, leftist liberal judges [working in conjunction with dems politicians] have filed over 220 lawsuits against the administration - political lawyer.

Our tax dollars should not go to them unless they stop leaning left and go politically neutral.

COVID shots - do not stop one from getting it, nor does it stop being passed on once have it. Next you fools till tell us that masks [which only stop bacteria, as virus molecules are small enough to pass through them], or that six foot spacing will help - LOL

Harvard will continue on very well without our tax dollars so am glad this is tasking place. If you hae a problem with that you should Google how large endowment fund they have.

Major change in government takes time - does not happen overnight, with rare exception, like the closure of the Southern boarder which happened in record time : )

"Harvard University's endowment is currently valued at $53.2 billion. This makes it the largest endowment among U.S. universities. The endowment's value has seen fluctuations, with increases in recent years due to strong investment returns"

With such a large endowment fund Harvard can structure for enough dividends off it to more than replace any of our tax dollars. Harvard dodoes not need our money - they just want it...