His only interest in the question is the belief that if enough voters find Harris' ignoring of the media off-putting it will harm her electoral chances.
Why wouldn't everyone find Harris ignoring the media as off-putting?
Why would you think this behavior would end once the campaign is over?
It's absurd.
That is why Harris should ignore them and make her case directly with the electorate.
But she's not, so now we are a you?
And the beauty of that is she has the money to do so.
TV ads are to be despised by true liberals.
Only some one beholden to the big media outlets would claim that this is "taking her case directly with the electorate".
Why do you care? You have no intention of even considering voting for her anyway.
#8 | POSTED BY REDIAL
Do you have that intention? I don't see why it's relevant whether someone is going to vote or not, they can still have an opinion, and in America we can express it. Unlike Canada, where you hail from.
American politics are strange to me.
Before the debate Trump offered two of dates and networks agree, and organized things for more debates, Kamala says "No"
After the debate Kamala is offering to debate again, Trump says "No".
Both sides win. Americans lose.
Didn't' there use to be a debate commission? What happened to that?