Not to mention using our military to eradicate Mexican cartels.
#19 | POSTED BY LEE_THE_AGENT

I am not sure what the problem with that would be, so long as they don't operate within the US.

For decades the US went after all sorts of groups that didn't pose a direct threat to US citizens, Syria for instance, Iraq.

I can't think of a more moral reason for military intervention eradicating the cartels..

Trump having a mandate of heaven and the armor of God? What's delusional about that?
#20 | POSTED BY LEE_THE_AGENT

He doesn't have a mandate.

Seriously, there's no reason to prove your ignorance with every post... we get it.

Yeah, that was stunningly stupid. Gotta agree.

#35 | POSTED BY YAV

You would, in what way did Corky defend the Millions of people that have entered the country illegally and stayed?

You can't tell me all these "asylum" seekers had no affect on housing, or hotel prices?

For the full fiscal year 2024, preliminary data show that DHS completed over 700,000 removals and returns, more than any prior fiscal year since 2010. That includes more removals to countries other than Mexico than in any prior year."

To help the poor people that you pretend to care about drive a car that doesn't roast the planet as much.

#91 | POSTED BY SPEAKSOFTLY

What is your definition of poor? Its a whole years salary to purchase a Model 3. In fact the poor can't even make use of the credit as they don't pay that much in taxes at that income level.

You want to not roast the planet, enforce laws so people can take transit safely. Everyone driving a car isn't going to help the environment.

Ballsmeller is smarter on the EV market than Musk... just ax' him.
#63 | POSTED BY CORKY

Musk doesn't mind the subsidy going away, it only affects the number of cars sold. What he really likes is the Billions brought in by the carbon credits.

Because the subsidies for oil are so large that EVs need a bigger subsidy to compete.

Nothing wrong with subsidies for better battery research. America will spend $1.3 trillion in renewable subsidies over the next decade from Inflation Reduction Act tax subsidies.

The subsidies for EVs benefits a rich class of people. You're asking for tax credit for the rich. Oil subsidies help all classes. Its an important distinction, which is why people call it "regressive".

I just got banned from reddit for responding that the reason liberals dominate reddit is because conservatives dont like reading that much.

That's it.

Fascists are purging everywhere they have even the slightest bit of power.
#9 | Posted by SpeakSoftly

DrudgeRetort: Hold my beer.

It's about ------ time!

#1 | POSTED BY HORSTNGRABEN

Its not over, by any means, Russia is now updating its Nuclear policy.

This could be very very bad for the globe, its odd to me Lumpers worry about Global Climate Change.

But don't mind a couple of nukes going off.

The mandates are the real problem. But then, centrally planned economics has never worked no matter how much people like Sycophant will scream otherwise.

This is where Syncophant doesn't understand what is happening,

We are now russia.
#2 | Posted by SpeakSoftly

We are like Russia's Gangster Grandfather... or Godfather.
#3 | Posted by Corky

Is this for real? FFS

With or without the mandate the competition between EV's remains the same.
#27 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Well the competition is ICE.

Taking away the EV credit means other automakers can't break into the space and Tesla can ride it's market share.

How much time did they need? Why not buy a small company already producing one, and make it better?

Ending the subsidy is beneficial to Tesla as a whole and harms the Big 3 disproportionately because it makes breaking into the EV space far more costly and time consuming.

It costs the same, regardless of the subsidy. How would it add time?

It's ridiculous that this even has to be explained to you, but then your thinking is dominated by Trump/Elon butt kissing. Logic is wholly absent.

Thats funny right there.

In CA newsom decides these things along with a communist court, against the will of the people.

Does this mean the cars are bad or does it mean bad drivers tend to buy them?

#2 | POSTED BY REDIAL

idk, why aren't they getting sued? Seems like liability here would be paramount to fix this abuse, and tech failure.

#8 | POSTED BY TRUTHHURTS TL;DR FLAG I'M AN IDIOT

When money is speech, saying things loudly gets all the attention. The Oligarchs are yelling now.
#4 | Posted by Corky

That would explain why everyone around Harris got rich!

Money isnt speech, content matters.

Muslims regretting their vote,
- TFD

I never understood the Muslim logic here, did they imagine any Republican going against Israel?

This says more about Muslims than anyone else.

All your base are belong to us

You do understand WHY things like this exist, right, magat scum?
They exist because of capitalism
Capitalism ENCOURAGES scamming people.
Boards are established to protect the consumers from scammers.

Now you understand why people are outraged at Doctors cutting up teens for profit.

You'll get there but it will take awhile.

It's in a deep blue state and Twoothy is going after MAGA

Seems like he was going after Capitalism.

Boards are established to protect the consumers from scammers.

They may have been "established" to protect consumers, but like all government systems over time they turn into authoritarian constructs for people like TruthCantTell to defend, because he loves Authoritarianism.

Old wiseman say: If your county is still "counting" votes ... it's "creating" votes.

#1 | POSTED BY MATTM

How did the world ever play sports with out InstantReplay.

American litigation of "sporting" events is fascinating to me, it misses the whole reason for sport.

Especially at the lower levels, next we'll see parents in T ball wanting instant replay.

#18 | POSTED BY TRUTHHURTS

This is like 3 days old, catch up FFS.

I am not OK with China trying to expand territory by engorging itself upon international places such as the islands it is building in the South China Sea.

Why? I think its wonderful for the Peruvians, you don't like Peru?

The same Lumpers worried about this, yet supported dock workers strike preventing real automation to happen at their ports.

Wake up.

Lumpers are going to do to "sex allegations" that they did to the cry of "Racist"